Payments concentrated with one vendor
79% of vendor payments went to ATANU PATRA.
Allocated limit
₹17.19 Cr
Median ₹14.70 Cr
Fund utilisation
41%
₹7.08 Cr recommended · 105 works
Below median (76%)
Paid to vendors
₹2.10 Cr
12% of allocation
Below median (37%)
Works completed
40
38% of recommended
Above median (28%)
From recommendation to completion
Every work this MP recommended, by stage
- Recommended by the MP105 works
₹7.08 Cr · 41% of the ₹17.19 Cr allocated
- Sanctioned by the district91 works
87% sanctioned · took 2.7 months on average (due within 45 days)
- Completed40 works
₹1.50 Cr final cost · 8.2 months from recommendation on average
14 works are still awaiting sanction, 14 of them for more than 45 days.
In plain words
What the numbers say
- Recommended 105 works worth ₹7.08 Cr, a fund utilisation of 41%, higher than 7.9% of 18th Lok Sabha MPs.
- The district has sanctioned 91 of them, taking 2.7 months on average.
- ₹2.10 Cr has been paid to vendors, 12% of the allocation.
- 40 works are complete, typically 8.2 months after recommendation. 40 works have geo-tagged photos on eSAKSHI.
- The largest share of funds went to Electricity & lighting.
- Payments went to 2 vendors. The largest received 79%.
- No citizen ratings have been reported for completed works.
How the score is made
MP score 51/100: finishing works counts most
- Works completed 30%38Completed ÷ recommended works.
- Spending efficiency 20%71Value of completed works ÷ money paid out. Money paid without works finished scores low.
- Fund utilisation 15%41Value of works recommended ÷ allocated limit (MoSPI’s measure).
- Proof of work 15%100Share of completed works with photos or documents uploaded on eSAKSHI.
- Funds spent 10%12Paid to vendors ÷ allocated limit.
- Vendor diversity 10%26How spread out payments are: full marks when no vendor gets over 20% of the money, none when one vendor gets everything.
i
Members of Parliament (MPs) do not have direct, operational control over the specific vendors selected for government public works. However, they exert significant indirect influence by shaping procurement frameworks, passing supplier diversity laws, and conducting oversight.
Largest vendor: ATANU PATRA, 79% of payments across 2 vendors.
District sanction speed
87/100 · sanction is the district authority’s job, so this doesn’t change the MP’s rank
- Sanction speed 100%87Average days to sanction (full marks within the 45-day guideline, none at a year), and the share of works not overdue.
Activity over time
Recommendations, payments and completions by month
Sectors
Value of works by category
Who got paid
Top vendors by payments received
Implementing district authorities
The districts that sanction and execute this MP’s works
Works
105 works · the 60 most recent are listed here, all of them in the explorer · tap “Photos” to see geo-tagged photos from eSAKSHI
COMMUNITY HALL
Community buildings & public spacesConstruction of community centers and community halls· Purulia· #229704
₹10.0 L Sanctioned · 9 Oct 2026Rec. 23 Dec 2025buring ghat and reat room
Community buildings & public spacesCrematoriums / Energy efficient crematoriums or structures on burial / cremation ground· Purulia· #243834
₹7.0 L Sanctioned · 9 Oct 2026Rec. 23 Dec 2025BURING GHAT AND REST ROOM
Community buildings & public spacesCrematoriums / Energy efficient crematoriums or structures on burial / cremation ground· Purulia· #243835
₹7.0 L Sanctioned · 9 Oct 2026Rec. 23 Dec 2025GYM MATERIALS & EQUIPMENTS
Sports & fitnessPurchase of training equipment· Purulia· #298119
₹12.0 L Sanctioned · 9 Oct 2026Rec. 22 Jul 2026GOAT FARMING
Agriculture & animal careConstruction of shelters for animals· Purulia· #305686
₹25.0 L Sanctioned · 9 Oct 2026Rec. 20 Aug 2026Community Hall
Community buildings & public spacesConstruction of community centers and community halls· Purulia· #211431
₹25.0 L Sanctioned · 7 Oct 2026Rec. 26 Jun 2025DEEP BORING FOR MAINTAINING ADEQUATE WATER SUPPLY
Drinking waterProviding supply pipelines for drinking water· Purulia· #305679
₹12.1 L Sanctioned · 7 Oct 2026Rec. 20 Aug 2026COMMUNITY HALL
Community buildings & public spacesConstruction of community centers and community halls· Purulia· #305680
₹12.6 L Sanctioned · 7 Oct 2026Rec. 20 Aug 2026CREMATION FURANCE AT BURING GHAT
Community buildings & public spacesCrematoriums / Energy efficient crematoriums or structures on burial / cremation ground· Purulia· #305681
₹7.0 L Sanctioned · 7 Oct 2026Rec. 20 Aug 2026ST COMMUNITY HALL
Community buildings & public spacesConstruction of community centers and community halls· Purulia· #305682
₹20.0 L Sanctioned · 7 Oct 2026Rec. 20 Aug 2026SOLAR LIGHT
Electricity & lightingLighting of public spaces· Purulia· #204503
₹3.7 L Completed 6 Oct 2026Rec. 26 Jun 2025Paid ₹3.7 LSOLAR LIGHT
Electricity & lightingLighting of public spaces· Purulia· #204504
₹3.7 L Completed 6 Oct 2026Rec. 26 Jun 2025Paid ₹3.7 LSolar Light
Electricity & lightingLighting of public spaces· Purulia· #211438
₹3.7 L Completed 6 Oct 2026Rec. 26 Jun 2025Paid ₹3.7 LSolar light
Electricity & lightingLighting of public spaces· Purulia· #211442
₹3.7 L Completed 6 Oct 2026Rec. 26 Jun 2025Paid ₹3.7 Lsolar light
Electricity & lightingLighting of public spaces· Purulia· #211444
₹3.7 L Completed 6 Oct 2026Rec. 26 Jun 2025Paid ₹3.7 L
18th Lok Sabha MPs from West Bengal
Ranked by MP score
| # | MP | Utilisation | Spent | Completed | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Asit Kumar Mal · Bolpur | 89% | 60% | 146 | 83 |
| 2 | Pratima Mondal · Joynagar | 66% | 50% | 180 | 82 |
| 3 | Kalyan Banerjee · Sreerampur | 63% | 52% | 97 | 82 |
| 4 | Shri Deepak (Dev) Adhikari · Ghatal | 95% | 56% | 166 | 81 |
| 5 | Shri Abhishek Banerjee · Diamond Harbour | 64% | 49% | 254 | 79 |
| 6 | Kalipada Saren · Jhargram | 78% | 49% | 40 | 76 |
| 7 | Prasun Banerjee · Howrah | 74% | 50% | 140 | 74 |
| 8 | Kakoli Ghosh Dastidar · Barasat | 87% | 43% | 82 | 71 |
| 9 | Smt Sajda Ahmed · Uluberia | 72% | 34% | 96 | 71 |
| 10 | Saumitra khan · Bishnupur | 98% | 44% | 48 | 71 |
| 11 | Bag Mitali · Arambag | 96% | 41% | 95 | 71 |
| 12 | Smt Satabdi Roy (Banerjee) · Birbhum | 48% | 32% | 62 | 71 |
Source: MoSPI eSAKSHI (eSAKSHI API (mplads.mospi.gov.in)). Fund utilisation = works recommended ÷ allocated limit (MoSPI’s definition); spent = vendor payments ÷ allocated limit; completion = completed ÷ recommended works. The MP score weighs completion, spending efficiency, utilisation, proof of work, spending and vendor diversity. How it’s calculated.