15th of 80 from Uttar Pradesh
Allocated limit
₹14.70 Cr
Median ₹14.70 Cr
Fund utilisation
93%
₹13.71 Cr recommended · 5 works
Above median (76%)
Paid to vendors
₹12.17 Cr
83% of allocation
Above median (37%)
Works completed
3
60% of recommended
Above median (28%)
From recommendation to completion
Every work this MP recommended, by stage
- Recommended by the MP5 works
₹13.71 Cr · 93% of the ₹14.70 Cr allocated
- Sanctioned by the district4 works
80% sanctioned · took 39 days on average (due within 45 days)
- Completed3 works
₹8.64 Cr final cost · 12.5 months from recommendation on average
1 works are still awaiting sanction, 1 of them for more than 45 days.
In plain words
What the numbers say
- Recommended 5 works worth ₹13.71 Cr, a fund utilisation of 93%, higher than 79% of 18th Lok Sabha MPs.
- The district has sanctioned 4 of them, taking 39 days on average.
- ₹12.17 Cr has been paid to vendors, 83% of the allocation.
- 3 works are complete, typically 12.5 months after recommendation. 3 works have geo-tagged photos on eSAKSHI.
- The largest share of funds went to Electricity & lighting.
- Payments went to 6 vendors. The largest received 31%.
- No citizen ratings have been reported for completed works.
How the score is made
MP score 72/100: finishing works counts most
- Works completed 30%60Completed ÷ recommended works.
- Spending efficiency 20%71Value of completed works ÷ money paid out. Money paid without works finished scores low.
- Fund utilisation 15%93Value of works recommended ÷ allocated limit (MoSPI’s measure).
- Proof of work 15%60Share of completed works with photos or documents uploaded on eSAKSHI.
- Funds spent 10%83Paid to vendors ÷ allocated limit.
- Vendor diversity 10%86How spread out payments are: full marks when no vendor gets over 20% of the money, none when one vendor gets everything.
i
Members of Parliament (MPs) do not have direct, operational control over the specific vendors selected for government public works. However, they exert significant indirect influence by shaping procurement frameworks, passing supplier diversity laws, and conducting oversight.
Largest vendor: SHRI GURU KRIPA NARSINGH ASSOSIATES, 31% of payments across 6 vendors.
District sanction speed
80/100 · sanction is the district authority’s job, so this doesn’t change the MP’s rank
- Sanction speed 100%80Average days to sanction (full marks within the 45-day guideline, none at a year), and the share of works not overdue.
Activity over time
Recommendations, payments and completions by month
Sectors
Value of works by category
Who got paid
Top vendors by payments received
Implementing district authorities
The districts that sanction and execute this MP’s works
Works
5 works · tap “Photos” to see geo-tagged photos from eSAKSHI
SUPPLY AND INSTALLATION OF LED SEMI HIGH MAST LIGHT AT 1 to 158 DIFFERENT PLACES
Electricity & lightingLighting of public spaces· Kanpur Nagar· #196288
₹3.78 Cr Completed 29 Sept 2026Rec. 3 May 2025Paid ₹3.78 Crsupply and installation of led semihigh mast light 200 places
Electricity & lightingLighting of public spaces· Sitapur· #290535
₹4.97 Cr Work partially Completed · 19 Aug 2026Rec. 30 Jun 2026Paid ₹3.53 CrSupply and installation of led semi high mast light at different place in district sitapur
Electricity & lightingLighting of public spaces· Sitapur· #170558
₹2.83 Cr Completed 30 Dec 2025Rec. 30 Jan 2025Paid ₹2.83 CrSupply and installation of led semi high mast light at 79 diffrent places in district sitapur.
Electricity & lightingLighting of public spaces· Sitapur· #180315
₹2.03 Cr Completed 30 Dec 2025Rec. 8 Mar 2025Paid ₹2.03 CrCONSTRUCTION OF HALL
Education & librariesConstruction of rooms and halls in school and colleges· Hardoi· #197859
₹9.5 L Awaiting sanction · 542 daysRec. 8 May 2025
18th Lok Sabha MPs from Uttar Pradesh
Ranked by MP score
| # | MP | Utilisation | Spent | Completed | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Shri Narendra Modi · Varanasi | 62% | 60% | 207 | 89 |
| 2 | Rajkumar Chahar · Fatehpur Sikri | 90% | 71% | 45 | 84 |
| 3 | Awadhesh Prasad · Faizabad | 98% | 65% | 143 | 84 |
| 4 | Utkarsh Verma Madhur · Kheri | 85% | 53% | 349 | 83 |
| 5 | Shri Arun Kumar Sagar · Shahjahanpur | 100% | 94% | 5 | 83 |
| 6 | Vinod Kumar Bind · Bhadohi | 81% | 58% | 525 | 82 |
| 7 | Ramesh Awasthi · Kanpur | 84% | 57% | 104 | 79 |
| 8 | Babu Singh Kushwaha · Jaunpur | 79% | 39% | 622 | 78 |
| 9 | Daroga Prasad Saroj · Lalganj | 65% | 56% | 212 | 76 |
| 10 | Mohibbullah · Rampur | 75% | 51% | 318 | 76 |
| 11 | Neeraj Maurya · Aonla | 100% | 91% | 17 | 75 |
| 12 | Mukesh Rajput · Farrukhabad | 99% | 91% | 246 | 74 |
Source: MoSPI eSAKSHI (eSAKSHI API (mplads.mospi.gov.in)). Fund utilisation = works recommended ÷ allocated limit (MoSPI’s definition); spent = vendor payments ÷ allocated limit; completion = completed ÷ recommended works. The MP score weighs completion, spending efficiency, utilisation, proof of work, spending and vendor diversity. How it’s calculated.