Skip to content
MPLADSTracker

MPLADS report card · 18th Lok Sabha

Shri Arun Kumar Sagar

Lok SabhaBJPSC seatShahjahanpur · Uttar Pradesh

MP score83/1008th of 542 in the 18th Lok Sabha
5th of 80 from Uttar Pradesh
Also an MP in the 17th Lok Sabha Then: 100% utilisation, 416 works completed, score 78.

Allocated limit

₹14.70 Cr

Median ₹14.70 Cr

Fund utilisation

100%

₹14.64 Cr recommended · 8 works
Above median (76%)

Paid to vendors

₹13.87 Cr

94% of allocation
Above median (37%)

Works completed

5

63% of recommended
Above median (28%)

From recommendation to completion

Every work this MP recommended, by stage

  1. Recommended by the MP8 works

    ₹14.64 Cr · 100% of the ₹14.70 Cr allocated

  2. Sanctioned by the district7 works

    88% sanctioned · took 31 days on average (due within 45 days)

  3. Completed5 works

    ₹12.83 Cr final cost · 3.5 months from recommendation on average

1 works are still awaiting sanction, 1 of them for more than 45 days.

In plain words

What the numbers say

  • Recommended 8 works worth ₹14.64 Cr, a fund utilisation of 100%, higher than 96% of 18th Lok Sabha MPs.
  • The district has sanctioned 7 of them, taking 31 days on average.
  • ₹13.87 Cr has been paid to vendors, 94% of the allocation.
  • 5 works are complete, typically 3.5 months after recommendation. 4 works have geo-tagged photos on eSAKSHI.
  • The largest share of funds went to Electricity & lighting.
  • Payments went to 6 vendors. The largest received 27%.
  • No citizen ratings have been reported for completed works.

How the score is made

MP score 83/100: finishing works counts most

  1. Works completed 30%63Completed ÷ recommended works.
  2. Spending efficiency 20%93Value of completed works ÷ money paid out. Money paid without works finished scores low.
  3. Fund utilisation 15%100Value of works recommended ÷ allocated limit (MoSPI’s measure).
  4. Proof of work 15%80Share of completed works with photos or documents uploaded on eSAKSHI.
  5. Funds spent 10%94Paid to vendors ÷ allocated limit.
  6. Vendor diversity 10%
    i

    Members of Parliament (MPs) do not have direct, operational control over the specific vendors selected for government public works. However, they exert significant indirect influence by shaping procurement frameworks, passing supplier diversity laws, and conducting oversight.

    91
    How spread out payments are: full marks when no vendor gets over 20% of the money, none when one vendor gets everything.

Largest vendor: RMK ENTERPRISES, 27% of payments across 6 vendors.

District sanction speed

94/100 · sanction is the district authority’s job, so this doesn’t change the MP’s rank

  1. Sanction speed 100%94Average days to sanction (full marks within the 45-day guideline, none at a year), and the share of works not overdue.

Activity over time

Recommendations, payments and completions by month

Value of works MPs recommended each month

Who got paid

Top vendors by payments received

Implementing district authorities

The districts that sanction and execute this MP’s works

Works

8 works · tap “Photos” to see geo-tagged photos from eSAKSHI

Open in explorer
  • Installation of 125 LED Semi Highmast Lights for rural and urban areas as per enclosed list

    Electricity & lightingLighting of public spaces· Shahjahanpur· #282269

    ₹3.12 Cr Completed 12 Sept 2026Rec. 20 May 2026Paid ₹3.12 Cr
  • Setting up a functional Computer Lab

    Education & librariesSetting up of laboratories· Shahjahanpur· #314162

    ₹5.0 L Awaiting sanction · 52 daysRec. 10 Sep 2026
  • 22 Yatri Tin Bus shades List for rural and Urban Areas as per enclosed List

    Community buildings & public spacesConstruction of bus-sheds or bus-stops· Shahjahanpur· #294027

    ₹1.45 Cr Work partially Completed · 14 Aug 2026Rec. 10 Jul 2026Paid ₹85.8 L
  • for the Construction of Rooms at College Hostel, Powayan

    Community buildings & public spacesConstruction of community centers and community halls· Shahjahanpur· #282327

    ₹30.0 L Vendor Identification · 27 Jul 2026Rec. 20 May 2026Paid ₹18.0 L
  • 14 Yatri Tin Bus shades List for rural and Urban Areas as per enclosed List

    Community buildings & public spacesConstruction of bus-sheds or bus-stops· Shahjahanpur· #189846

    ₹92.4 L Completed 26 Jul 2025Rec. 7 Apr 2025Paid ₹92.4 L
  • Installation of 165 LED Highmast Lights for rural and urban areas as per enclosed list

    Electricity & lightingLighting of public spaces· Shahjahanpur· #194809

    ₹4.01 Cr Completed 26 Jul 2025Rec. 27 Apr 2025Paid ₹4.01 Cr
  • 15 Yatri Tin/Bus shades List for rural and Urban Areas as per enclosed List

    Community buildings & public spacesConstruction of bus-sheds or bus-stops· Shahjahanpur· #134981

    ₹99.0 L Completed 25 Nov 2024Rec. 7 Aug 2024Paid ₹99.0 L
  • Installation of 156 LED Highmast Lights for Rural and Urban areas as per enclosed List

    Electricity & lightingLighting of public spaces· Shahjahanpur· #134984

    ₹3.79 Cr Completed 25 Nov 2024Rec. 7 Aug 2024Paid ₹3.79 Cr

18th Lok Sabha MPs from Uttar Pradesh

Ranked by MP score

Compare
#MPUtilisationSpentCompletedScore
1Shri Narendra Modi · Varanasi62%60%20789
2Rajkumar Chahar · Fatehpur Sikri90%71%4584
3Awadhesh Prasad · Faizabad98%65%14384
4Utkarsh Verma Madhur · Kheri85%53%34983
5Shri Arun Kumar Sagar · Shahjahanpur100%94%583
6Vinod Kumar Bind · Bhadohi81%58%52582
7Ramesh Awasthi · Kanpur84%57%10479
8Babu Singh Kushwaha · Jaunpur79%39%62278
9Daroga Prasad Saroj · Lalganj65%56%21276
10Mohibbullah · Rampur75%51%31876
11Neeraj Maurya · Aonla100%91%1775
12Mukesh Rajput · Farrukhabad99%91%24674

Source: MoSPI eSAKSHI (eSAKSHI API (mplads.mospi.gov.in)). Fund utilisation = works recommended ÷ allocated limit (MoSPI’s definition); spent = vendor payments ÷ allocated limit; completion = completed ÷ recommended works. The MP score weighs completion, spending efficiency, utilisation, proof of work, spending and vendor diversity. How it’s calculated.