62nd of 80 from Uttar Pradesh
Works waiting for sanction
278 recommended works are still awaiting sanction more than 45 days later. Sanction is the district authority’s responsibility.
Payments concentrated with one vendor
72% of vendor payments went to ARVIND KUMAR PANDEY.
Allocated limit
₹18.04 Cr
Median ₹14.70 Cr
Fund utilisation
97%
₹17.56 Cr recommended · 686 works
Above median (76%)
Paid to vendors
₹9.83 Cr
54% of allocation
Above median (37%)
Works completed
115
17% of recommended
Below median (28%)
From recommendation to completion
Every work this MP recommended, by stage
- Recommended by the MP686 works
₹17.56 Cr · 97% of the ₹18.04 Cr allocated
- Sanctioned by the district350 works
51% sanctioned · took 6.3 months on average (due within 45 days)
- Completed115 works
₹5.73 Cr final cost · 17.3 months from recommendation on average
336 works are still awaiting sanction, 278 of them for more than 45 days.
In plain words
What the numbers say
- Recommended 686 works worth ₹17.56 Cr, a fund utilisation of 97%, higher than 88% of 18th Lok Sabha MPs.
- The district has sanctioned 350 of them, taking 6.3 months on average.
- ₹9.83 Cr has been paid to vendors, 54% of the allocation.
- 115 works are complete, typically 17.3 months after recommendation. 74 works have geo-tagged photos on eSAKSHI.
- The largest share of funds went to Electricity & lighting.
- Payments went to 9 vendors. The largest received 72%.
- No citizen ratings have been reported for completed works.
How the score is made
MP score 50/100: finishing works counts most
- Works completed 30%17Completed ÷ recommended works.
- Spending efficiency 20%58Value of completed works ÷ money paid out. Money paid without works finished scores low.
- Fund utilisation 15%97Value of works recommended ÷ allocated limit (MoSPI’s measure).
- Proof of work 15%64Share of completed works with photos or documents uploaded on eSAKSHI.
- Funds spent 10%54Paid to vendors ÷ allocated limit.
- Vendor diversity 10%35How spread out payments are: full marks when no vendor gets over 20% of the money, none when one vendor gets everything.
i
Members of Parliament (MPs) do not have direct, operational control over the specific vendors selected for government public works. However, they exert significant indirect influence by shaping procurement frameworks, passing supplier diversity laws, and conducting oversight.
Largest vendor: ARVIND KUMAR PANDEY, 72% of payments across 9 vendors.
District sanction speed
57/100 · sanction is the district authority’s job, so this doesn’t change the MP’s rank
- Sanction speed 100%57Average days to sanction (full marks within the 45-day guideline, none at a year), and the share of works not overdue.
Activity over time
Recommendations, payments and completions by month
Sectors
Value of works by category
Who got paid
Top vendors by payments received
Implementing district authorities
The districts that sanction and execute this MP’s works
Works
686 works · the 60 most recent are listed here, all of them in the explorer · tap “Photos” to see geo-tagged photos from eSAKSHI
Installation of Semi High Mast Lights at different places as per attached recommendation letter
Electricity & lightingStreet lights· Ballia· #148345
₹2.2 L Completed 15 Oct 2026Rec. 21 Oct 2024Paid ₹2.2 LInstallation of Semi High Mast Lights at different places as per attached recommendation letter
Electricity & lightingStreet lights· Ballia· #148351
₹2.2 L Completed 15 Oct 2026Rec. 21 Oct 2024Paid ₹2.2 LInstallation of Semi High Mast Lights at different places as per attached recommendation letter
Electricity & lightingStreet lights· Ballia· #148356
₹2.2 L Completed 15 Oct 2026Rec. 21 Oct 2024Paid ₹2.2 LInstallation of Semi High Mast Lights at different places as per attached recommendation letter
Electricity & lightingStreet lights· Ballia· #148368
₹2.2 L Completed 15 Oct 2026Rec. 21 Oct 2024Paid ₹2.2 LConstruction of Interlocking Road In Gram Panchayat Panditpura, From Salempur Lakhmi Canal to Achyutanand Chaturvedi House – 140 mtr Revised Letter Attached
Roads & bridgesConstruction of roads, link roads, pathways or any other road with or without drainage system· Ghazipur· #148474
₹6.9 L Completed 15 Oct 2026Rec. 21 Oct 2024Paid ₹6.9 LInstallation of Semi High Mast Lights at different places as per attached recommendation letter.
Electricity & lightingStreet lights· Ballia· #148713
₹2.2 L Completed 15 Oct 2026Rec. 21 Oct 2024Paid ₹2.2 LInstallation of Semi High Mast Lights at different places as per attached recommendation letter.
Electricity & lightingStreet lights· Ballia· #148715
₹2.2 L Completed 15 Oct 2026Rec. 21 Oct 2024Paid ₹2.2 LInstallation of Semi High Mast Lights at different places as per attached recommendation letter
Electricity & lightingStreet lights· Ballia· #148338
₹2.2 L Completed 13 Oct 2026Rec. 21 Oct 2024Paid ₹2.2 LInstallation of Semi High Mast Lights at different places as per attached recommendation letter
Electricity & lightingStreet lights· Ballia· #148339
₹2.2 L Completed 13 Oct 2026Rec. 21 Oct 2024Paid ₹2.2 LInstallation of Semi High Mast Lights at different places as per attached recommendation letter
Electricity & lightingStreet lights· Ballia· #148340
₹2.2 L Completed 13 Oct 2026Rec. 21 Oct 2024Paid ₹2.2 LInstallation of Semi High Mast Lights at different places as per attached recommendation letter
Electricity & lightingStreet lights· Ballia· #148341
₹2.2 L Completed 13 Oct 2026Rec. 21 Oct 2024Paid ₹2.2 LInstallation of Semi High Mast Lights at different places as per attached recommendation letter
Electricity & lightingStreet lights· Ballia· #148342
₹2.2 L Completed 13 Oct 2026Rec. 21 Oct 2024Paid ₹2.2 LInstallation of Semi High Mast Lights at different places as per attached recommendation letter
Electricity & lightingStreet lights· Ballia· #148343
₹2.2 L Completed 13 Oct 2026Rec. 21 Oct 2024Paid ₹2.2 LInstallation of Semi High Mast Lights at different places as per attached recommendation letter
Electricity & lightingStreet lights· Ballia· #148344
₹2.2 L Completed 13 Oct 2026Rec. 21 Oct 2024Paid ₹2.2 LInstallation of Semi High Mast Lights at different places as per attached recommendation letter
Electricity & lightingStreet lights· Ballia· #148346
₹2.2 L Completed 13 Oct 2026Rec. 21 Oct 2024Paid ₹2.2 L
18th Lok Sabha MPs from Uttar Pradesh
Ranked by MP score
| # | MP | Utilisation | Spent | Completed | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Shri Narendra Modi · Varanasi | 62% | 60% | 207 | 89 |
| 2 | Rajkumar Chahar · Fatehpur Sikri | 90% | 71% | 45 | 84 |
| 3 | Awadhesh Prasad · Faizabad | 98% | 65% | 143 | 84 |
| 4 | Utkarsh Verma Madhur · Kheri | 85% | 53% | 349 | 83 |
| 5 | Shri Arun Kumar Sagar · Shahjahanpur | 100% | 94% | 5 | 83 |
| 6 | Vinod Kumar Bind · Bhadohi | 81% | 58% | 525 | 82 |
| 7 | Ramesh Awasthi · Kanpur | 84% | 57% | 104 | 79 |
| 8 | Babu Singh Kushwaha · Jaunpur | 79% | 39% | 622 | 78 |
| 9 | Daroga Prasad Saroj · Lalganj | 65% | 56% | 212 | 76 |
| 10 | Mohibbullah · Rampur | 75% | 51% | 318 | 76 |
| 11 | Neeraj Maurya · Aonla | 100% | 91% | 17 | 75 |
| 12 | Mukesh Rajput · Farrukhabad | 99% | 91% | 246 | 74 |
Source: MoSPI eSAKSHI (eSAKSHI API (mplads.mospi.gov.in)). Fund utilisation = works recommended ÷ allocated limit (MoSPI’s definition); spent = vendor payments ÷ allocated limit; completion = completed ÷ recommended works. The MP score weighs completion, spending efficiency, utilisation, proof of work, spending and vendor diversity. How it’s calculated.