80th of 80 from Uttar Pradesh
Works waiting for sanction
708 recommended works are still awaiting sanction more than 45 days later. Sanction is the district authority’s responsibility.
No completed works reported
1357 works recommended, none reported complete yet.
Payments concentrated with one vendor
84% of vendor payments went to NAVEEN ENTERPRISES.
Allocated limit
₹15.17 Cr
Median ₹14.70 Cr
Fund utilisation
59%
₹9.01 Cr recommended · 1,357 works
Below median (76%)
Paid to vendors
₹2.42 Cr
16% of allocation
Below median (37%)
Works completed
0
0% of recommended
Below median (28%)
From recommendation to completion
Every work this MP recommended, by stage
- Recommended by the MP1,357 works
₹9.01 Cr · 59% of the ₹15.17 Cr allocated
- Sanctioned by the district649 works
48% sanctioned · took 5.8 months on average (due within 45 days)
- Completed0 works
₹0 final cost
708 works are still awaiting sanction, 708 of them for more than 45 days.
In plain words
What the numbers say
- Recommended 1,357 works worth ₹9.01 Cr, a fund utilisation of 59%, higher than 22% of 18th Lok Sabha MPs.
- The district has sanctioned 649 of them, taking 5.8 months on average.
- ₹2.42 Cr has been paid to vendors, 16% of the allocation.
- 0 works are complete.
- The largest share of funds went to Electricity & lighting.
- Payments went to 4 vendors. The largest received 84%.
- No citizen ratings have been reported for completed works.
How the score is made
MP score 12/100: finishing works counts most
- Works completed 30%0Completed ÷ recommended works.
- Spending efficiency 20%0Value of completed works ÷ money paid out. Money paid without works finished scores low.
- Fund utilisation 15%59Value of works recommended ÷ allocated limit (MoSPI’s measure).
- Proof of work 15%0Share of completed works with photos or documents uploaded on eSAKSHI.
- Funds spent 10%16Paid to vendors ÷ allocated limit.
- Vendor diversity 10%19How spread out payments are: full marks when no vendor gets over 20% of the money, none when one vendor gets everything.
i
Members of Parliament (MPs) do not have direct, operational control over the specific vendors selected for government public works. However, they exert significant indirect influence by shaping procurement frameworks, passing supplier diversity laws, and conducting oversight.
Largest vendor: NAVEEN ENTERPRISES, 84% of payments across 4 vendors.
District sanction speed
54/100 · sanction is the district authority’s job, so this doesn’t change the MP’s rank
- Sanction speed 100%54Average days to sanction (full marks within the 45-day guideline, none at a year), and the share of works not overdue.
Activity over time
Recommendations, payments and completions by month
Sectors
Value of works by category
Who got paid
Top vendors by payments received
Implementing district authorities
The districts that sanction and execute this MP’s works
Works
1,357 works · the 60 most recent are listed here, all of them in the explorer · tap “Photos” to see geo-tagged photos from eSAKSHI
Installation of a high-mast light (9 meters in height, including 6 lights) near the temple close to Prabhakar Verma house
Electricity & lightingLighting of public spaces· Shrawasti· #309085
₹2.2 L Awaiting sanction · 62 daysRec. 31 Aug 202640-Installation of a solar street light near Rajesh Valmiki house at Valmiki Water Tank Ramna
Electricity & lightingStreet lights· Shrawasti· #264256
₹26,150 Sanctioned · 21 Aug 2026Rec. 4 Feb 202642-Installation of a solar street light near the water tank in Kyapurwa
Electricity & lightingStreet lights· Shrawasti· #264258
₹26,150 Sanctioned · 21 Aug 2026Rec. 4 Feb 202643-Installation of a solar street light near Shankar Ji temple
Electricity & lightingStreet lights· Shrawasti· #264259
₹26,150 Sanctioned · 21 Aug 2026Rec. 4 Feb 202644-Installation of a solar street light near Shankar Ji big Shiva temple
Electricity & lightingStreet lights· Shrawasti· #264260
₹26,150 Sanctioned · 21 Aug 2026Rec. 4 Feb 202645-Installation of a solar street light near Shankar Ji temple in Jarkushaha
Electricity & lightingStreet lights· Shrawasti· #264261
₹26,150 Sanctioned · 21 Aug 2026Rec. 4 Feb 202646-Installation of a solar street light near the Shiva temple in Kursahw
Electricity & lightingStreet lights· Shrawasti· #264262
₹26,150 Sanctioned · 21 Aug 2026Rec. 4 Feb 202647-Installation of a solar street light near Shankar Ji temple
Electricity & lightingStreet lights· Shrawasti· #264263
₹26,150 Sanctioned · 21 Aug 2026Rec. 4 Feb 202649-Installation of a solar street light near the intersection in Masaha Kala Installation
Electricity & lightingStreet lights· Shrawasti· #264265
₹26,150 Sanctioned · 21 Aug 2026Rec. 4 Feb 202650-Installation of a solar street light near the house of Mangaleshwar Prasad Yadav in Kurshaha.
Electricity & lightingStreet lights· Shrawasti· #264266
₹26,150 Sanctioned · 21 Aug 2026Rec. 4 Feb 20261-Installation of a solar street light near Firoz Ahmed house in Kurshaha
Electricity & lightingStreet lights· Shrawasti· #264303
₹26,150 Sanctioned · 21 Aug 2026Rec. 4 Feb 20263-Installation of a solar street light near the intersection of Ramnagar village
Electricity & lightingStreet lights· Shrawasti· #264305
₹26,150 Sanctioned · 21 Aug 2026Rec. 4 Feb 20264-Installation of a solar street light near Gaya Prasad Dom house in Khargaura
Electricity & lightingStreet lights· Shrawasti· #264306
₹26,150 Sanctioned · 21 Aug 2026Rec. 4 Feb 20265-Installation of a solar street light near the intersection in Gujarpurwa
Electricity & lightingStreet lights· Shrawasti· #264307
₹26,150 Sanctioned · 21 Aug 2026Rec. 4 Feb 20266-Installation of a solar street light near Vipaldas Kuttipurwa
Electricity & lightingStreet lights· Shrawasti· #264308
₹26,150 Sanctioned · 21 Aug 2026Rec. 4 Feb 2026
18th Lok Sabha MPs from Uttar Pradesh
Ranked by MP score
| # | MP | Utilisation | Spent | Completed | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Shri Narendra Modi · Varanasi | 62% | 60% | 207 | 89 |
| 2 | Rajkumar Chahar · Fatehpur Sikri | 90% | 71% | 45 | 84 |
| 3 | Awadhesh Prasad · Faizabad | 98% | 65% | 143 | 84 |
| 4 | Utkarsh Verma Madhur · Kheri | 85% | 53% | 349 | 83 |
| 5 | Shri Arun Kumar Sagar · Shahjahanpur | 100% | 94% | 5 | 83 |
| 6 | Vinod Kumar Bind · Bhadohi | 81% | 58% | 525 | 82 |
| 7 | Ramesh Awasthi · Kanpur | 84% | 57% | 104 | 79 |
| 8 | Babu Singh Kushwaha · Jaunpur | 79% | 39% | 622 | 78 |
| 9 | Daroga Prasad Saroj · Lalganj | 65% | 56% | 212 | 76 |
| 10 | Mohibbullah · Rampur | 75% | 51% | 318 | 76 |
| 11 | Neeraj Maurya · Aonla | 100% | 91% | 17 | 75 |
| 12 | Mukesh Rajput · Farrukhabad | 99% | 91% | 246 | 74 |
Source: MoSPI eSAKSHI (eSAKSHI API (mplads.mospi.gov.in)). Fund utilisation = works recommended ÷ allocated limit (MoSPI’s definition); spent = vendor payments ÷ allocated limit; completion = completed ÷ recommended works. The MP score weighs completion, spending efficiency, utilisation, proof of work, spending and vendor diversity. How it’s calculated.