38th of 40 from Bihar
Most funds not yet used
Works recommended for only 0.7% of the allocated limit.
Allocated limit
₹14.70 Cr
Median ₹14.70 Cr
Fund utilisation
0.7%
₹10.0 L recommended · 1 works
Below median (76%)
Paid to vendors
₹0
0% of allocation
Below median (37%)
Works completed
0
0% of recommended
Below median (28%)
From recommendation to completion
Every work this MP recommended, by stage
- Recommended by the MP1 works
₹10.0 L · 0.7% of the ₹14.70 Cr allocated
- Sanctioned by the district0 works
0% sanctioned
- Completed0 works
₹0 final cost
1 works are still awaiting sanction, 1 of them for more than 45 days.
In plain words
What the numbers say
- Recommended 1 works worth ₹10.0 L, a fund utilisation of 0.7%, higher than 0.7% of 18th Lok Sabha MPs.
- The district has sanctioned 0 of them.
- ₹0 has been paid to vendors, 0% of the allocation.
- 0 works are complete.
- The largest share of funds went to Education & libraries.
- No citizen ratings have been reported for completed works.
How the score is made
MP score 0/100: finishing works counts most
- Works completed 30%0Completed ÷ recommended works.
- Spending efficiency 20%Not enough dataValue of completed works ÷ money paid out. Money paid without works finished scores low.
- Fund utilisation 15%1Value of works recommended ÷ allocated limit (MoSPI’s measure).
- Proof of work 15%Not enough dataShare of completed works with photos or documents uploaded on eSAKSHI.
- Funds spent 10%0Paid to vendors ÷ allocated limit.
- Vendor diversity 10%Not enough dataHow spread out payments are: full marks when no vendor gets over 20% of the money, none when one vendor gets everything.
i
Members of Parliament (MPs) do not have direct, operational control over the specific vendors selected for government public works. However, they exert significant indirect influence by shaping procurement frameworks, passing supplier diversity laws, and conducting oversight.
District sanction speed
Not enough data yet · sanction is the district authority’s job, so this doesn’t change the MP’s rank
- Sanction speed 100%Not enough dataAverage days to sanction (full marks within the 45-day guideline, none at a year), and the share of works not overdue.
Activity over time
Recommendations, payments and completions by month
Sectors
Value of works by category
Who got paid
Top vendors by payments received
No vendor payments recorded yet.
Implementing district authorities
The districts that sanction and execute this MP’s works
Works
1 works · tap “Photos” to see geo-tagged photos from eSAKSHI
CONSTRUCTION OF HALL BUILDINGH IN SADAI BIGHA HIGH SCHOOL IN GIRDHARPUR PANCHAYAT UNDER BARAHIYA BLOCK
Education & librariesConstruction of buildings for crèches and anganwadies· Lakhisarai· #259368
₹10.0 L Awaiting sanction · 289 daysRec. 16 Jan 2026
18th Lok Sabha MPs from Bihar
Ranked by MP score
| # | MP | Utilisation | Spent | Completed | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Raj Bhushan Choudhary · Muzaffarpur | 97% | 81% | 80 | 81 |
| 2 | Giridhari Yadav · Banka | 98% | 79% | 94 | 81 |
| 3 | Rajesh Verma · Khagaria | 56% | 52% | 67 | 79 |
| 4 | Jitan Ram Manjhi · Gaya | 77% | 46% | 194 | 78 |
| 5 | Arun Bharti · Jamui | 92% | 74% | 270 | 77 |
| 6 | Kaushalendra Kumar · Nalanda | 57% | 37% | 118 | 76 |
| 7 | Smt Veena Devi · Vaishali | 100% | 89% | 30 | 76 |
| 8 | Radha Mohan Singh · Purvi Champaran | 89% | 47% | 68 | 74 |
| 9 | Vijaylakshmi Devi · Siwan | 97% | 95% | 95 | 74 |
| 10 | Ravi Shankar Prasad · Patna Sahib | 48% | 40% | 60 | 72 |
| 11 | Dr Mohammad Jawed · Kishanganj | 89% | 65% | 130 | 72 |
| 12 | Ajay Kumar Mandal · Bhagalpur | 58% | 54% | 59 | 71 |
Source: MoSPI eSAKSHI (eSAKSHI API (mplads.mospi.gov.in)). Fund utilisation = works recommended ÷ allocated limit (MoSPI’s definition); spent = vendor payments ÷ allocated limit; completion = completed ÷ recommended works. The MP score weighs completion, spending efficiency, utilisation, proof of work, spending and vendor diversity. How it’s calculated.