9th of 40 from Bihar
Payments concentrated with one vendor
81% of vendor payments went to Alam Brothers.
Allocated limit
₹14.70 Cr
Median ₹14.70 Cr
Fund utilisation
97%
₹14.33 Cr recommended · 148 works
Above median (76%)
Paid to vendors
₹13.93 Cr
95% of allocation
Above median (37%)
Works completed
95
64% of recommended
Above median (28%)
From recommendation to completion
Every work this MP recommended, by stage
- Recommended by the MP148 works
₹14.33 Cr · 97% of the ₹14.70 Cr allocated
- Sanctioned by the district144 works
97% sanctioned · took 2.7 months on average (due within 45 days)
- Completed95 works
₹9.05 Cr final cost · 5.7 months from recommendation on average
4 works are still awaiting sanction, 4 of them for more than 45 days.
In plain words
What the numbers say
- Recommended 148 works worth ₹14.33 Cr, a fund utilisation of 97%, higher than 88% of 18th Lok Sabha MPs.
- The district has sanctioned 144 of them, taking 2.7 months on average.
- ₹13.93 Cr has been paid to vendors, 95% of the allocation.
- 95 works are complete, typically 5.7 months after recommendation. 95 works have geo-tagged photos on eSAKSHI.
- The largest share of funds went to Electricity & lighting.
- Payments went to 11 vendors. The largest received 81%.
- No citizen ratings have been reported for completed works.
How the score is made
MP score 74/100: finishing works counts most
- Works completed 30%64Completed ÷ recommended works.
- Spending efficiency 20%65Value of completed works ÷ money paid out. Money paid without works finished scores low.
- Fund utilisation 15%97Value of works recommended ÷ allocated limit (MoSPI’s measure).
- Proof of work 15%100Share of completed works with photos or documents uploaded on eSAKSHI.
- Funds spent 10%95Paid to vendors ÷ allocated limit.
- Vendor diversity 10%23How spread out payments are: full marks when no vendor gets over 20% of the money, none when one vendor gets everything.
i
Members of Parliament (MPs) do not have direct, operational control over the specific vendors selected for government public works. However, they exert significant indirect influence by shaping procurement frameworks, passing supplier diversity laws, and conducting oversight.
Largest vendor: Alam Brothers, 81% of payments across 11 vendors.
District sanction speed
93/100 · sanction is the district authority’s job, so this doesn’t change the MP’s rank
- Sanction speed 100%93Average days to sanction (full marks within the 45-day guideline, none at a year), and the share of works not overdue.
Activity over time
Recommendations, payments and completions by month
Sectors
Value of works by category
Who got paid
Top vendors by payments received
Implementing district authorities
The districts that sanction and execute this MP’s works
Works
148 works · the 60 most recent are listed here, all of them in the explorer · tap “Photos” to see geo-tagged photos from eSAKSHI
70 Book Self in Siwan Sadar School.
Education & librariesPurchase of furniture and fixtures for educational purposes· Siwan· #317110
₹25.6 L Physical Inspection · 22 Sept 2026Rec. 22 Sep 2026Paid ₹25.6 LOPEN GYM
Sports & fitnessInstallation of fixed garden gym equipment· Siwan· #287685
₹10.0 L Physical Inspection · 10 Sept 2026Rec. 20 Jun 2026Paid ₹10.0 LOPEN GYM
Sports & fitnessInstallation of fixed garden gym equipment· Siwan· #287686
₹10.0 L Physical Inspection · 10 Sept 2026Rec. 20 Jun 2026Paid ₹10.0 LHIGH MASK LIGHT
Electricity & lightingLighting of public spaces· Siwan· #301879
₹9.7 L Awaiting sanction · 86 daysRec. 7 Aug 2026HIGH MASK LIGHT
Electricity & lightingLighting of public spaces· Siwan· #301880
₹9.7 L Awaiting sanction · 86 daysRec. 7 Aug 2026HIGH MASK LIGHT
Electricity & lightingLighting of public spaces· Siwan· #301881
₹9.7 L Awaiting sanction · 86 daysRec. 7 Aug 2026HIGH MASK LIGHT
Electricity & lightingLighting of public spaces· Siwan· #301882
₹9.7 L Awaiting sanction · 86 daysRec. 7 Aug 2026HIGH MASK LIGHT
Electricity & lightingLighting of public spaces· Siwan· #283350
₹9.6 L Physical Inspection · 19 Jun 2026Rec. 23 May 2026Paid ₹9.6 LHIGH MASK LIGHT
Electricity & lightingLighting of public spaces· Siwan· #283351
₹9.6 L Physical Inspection · 19 Jun 2026Rec. 23 May 2026Paid ₹9.6 LHIGH MASK LIGHT
Electricity & lightingLighting of public spaces· Siwan· #283352
₹9.6 L Physical Inspection · 19 Jun 2026Rec. 23 May 2026Paid ₹9.6 LHIGH MASK LIGHT
Electricity & lightingLighting of public spaces· Siwan· #283353
₹9.6 L Physical Inspection · 19 Jun 2026Rec. 23 May 2026Paid ₹9.6 LHIGH MASK LIGHT
Electricity & lightingLighting of public spaces· Siwan· #283354
₹9.6 L Physical Inspection · 19 Jun 2026Rec. 23 May 2026Paid ₹9.6 LHIGH MASK LIGHT
Electricity & lightingLighting of public spaces· Siwan· #283355
₹9.6 L Physical Inspection · 19 Jun 2026Rec. 23 May 2026Paid ₹9.6 LHIGH MASK LIGHT
Electricity & lightingLighting of public spaces· Siwan· #283356
₹9.6 L Physical Inspection · 19 Jun 2026Rec. 23 May 2026Paid ₹9.6 LHIGH MASK LIGHT
Electricity & lightingLighting of public spaces· Siwan· #283357
₹9.6 L Physical Inspection · 19 Jun 2026Rec. 23 May 2026Paid ₹9.6 L
18th Lok Sabha MPs from Bihar
Ranked by MP score
| # | MP | Utilisation | Spent | Completed | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Raj Bhushan Choudhary · Muzaffarpur | 97% | 81% | 80 | 81 |
| 2 | Giridhari Yadav · Banka | 98% | 79% | 94 | 81 |
| 3 | Rajesh Verma · Khagaria | 56% | 52% | 67 | 79 |
| 4 | Jitan Ram Manjhi · Gaya | 77% | 46% | 194 | 78 |
| 5 | Arun Bharti · Jamui | 92% | 74% | 270 | 77 |
| 6 | Kaushalendra Kumar · Nalanda | 57% | 37% | 118 | 76 |
| 7 | Smt Veena Devi · Vaishali | 100% | 89% | 30 | 76 |
| 8 | Radha Mohan Singh · Purvi Champaran | 89% | 47% | 68 | 74 |
| 9 | Vijaylakshmi Devi · Siwan | 97% | 95% | 95 | 74 |
| 10 | Ravi Shankar Prasad · Patna Sahib | 48% | 40% | 60 | 72 |
| 11 | Dr Mohammad Jawed · Kishanganj | 89% | 65% | 130 | 72 |
| 12 | Ajay Kumar Mandal · Bhagalpur | 58% | 54% | 59 | 71 |
Source: MoSPI eSAKSHI (eSAKSHI API (mplads.mospi.gov.in)). Fund utilisation = works recommended ÷ allocated limit (MoSPI’s definition); spent = vendor payments ÷ allocated limit; completion = completed ÷ recommended works. The MP score weighs completion, spending efficiency, utilisation, proof of work, spending and vendor diversity. How it’s calculated.