11th of 40 from Bihar
Payments concentrated with one vendor
63% of vendor payments went to RANJIT SALES CORPORATION.
Allocated limit
₹14.87 Cr
Median ₹14.70 Cr
Fund utilisation
89%
₹13.17 Cr recommended · 203 works
Above median (76%)
Paid to vendors
₹9.69 Cr
65% of allocation
Above median (37%)
Works completed
130
64% of recommended
Above median (28%)
From recommendation to completion
Every work this MP recommended, by stage
- Recommended by the MP203 works
₹13.17 Cr · 89% of the ₹14.87 Cr allocated
- Sanctioned by the district183 works
90% sanctioned · took 2.2 months on average (due within 45 days)
- Completed130 works
₹8.39 Cr final cost · 6.2 months from recommendation on average
20 works are still awaiting sanction.
In plain words
What the numbers say
- Recommended 203 works worth ₹13.17 Cr, a fund utilisation of 89%, higher than 71% of 18th Lok Sabha MPs.
- The district has sanctioned 183 of them, taking 2.2 months on average.
- ₹9.69 Cr has been paid to vendors, 65% of the allocation.
- 130 works are complete, typically 6.2 months after recommendation. 94 works have geo-tagged photos on eSAKSHI.
- The largest share of funds went to Electricity & lighting.
- Payments went to 3 vendors. The largest received 63%.
- No citizen ratings have been reported for completed works.
How the score is made
MP score 72/100: finishing works counts most
- Works completed 30%64Completed ÷ recommended works.
- Spending efficiency 20%87Value of completed works ÷ money paid out. Money paid without works finished scores low.
- Fund utilisation 15%89Value of works recommended ÷ allocated limit (MoSPI’s measure).
- Proof of work 15%72Share of completed works with photos or documents uploaded on eSAKSHI.
- Funds spent 10%65Paid to vendors ÷ allocated limit.
- Vendor diversity 10%46How spread out payments are: full marks when no vendor gets over 20% of the money, none when one vendor gets everything.
i
Members of Parliament (MPs) do not have direct, operational control over the specific vendors selected for government public works. However, they exert significant indirect influence by shaping procurement frameworks, passing supplier diversity laws, and conducting oversight.
Largest vendor: RANJIT SALES CORPORATION, 63% of payments across 3 vendors.
District sanction speed
96/100 · sanction is the district authority’s job, so this doesn’t change the MP’s rank
- Sanction speed 100%96Average days to sanction (full marks within the 45-day guideline, none at a year), and the share of works not overdue.
Activity over time
Recommendations, payments and completions by month
Sectors
Value of works by category
Who got paid
Top vendors by payments received
Implementing district authorities
The districts that sanction and execute this MP’s works
Works
203 works · the 60 most recent are listed here, all of them in the explorer · tap “Photos” to see geo-tagged photos from eSAKSHI
DAGARUA PRAKAND ANTARGART RAMPUR PANCHAYAT KE MADARSA ISLAHUL MUSALIMIN TELNIYA RAHIKA PARISAR ME. (14M) HIGH MAST LIGHT
Electricity & lightingLighting of public spaces· Purnia· #317126
₹6.7 L Awaiting sanction · 39 daysRec. 23 Sep 2026DAGARUA PRAKAND ANTARGART DAGARUA PANCHAYT KE DAGARUA PRAKHAND PARISAR ME. (14M) HIGH MAST LIGHT
Electricity & lightingLighting of public spaces· Purnia· #317127
₹6.7 L Awaiting sanction · 39 daysRec. 23 Sep 2026DAGARUA PRAKAND ANTARGART CHANPI PANCHAYAT KE SIYARKHAM SCHOOL KE PASS. (14M) HIGH MAST LIGHT
Electricity & lightingLighting of public spaces· Purnia· #317128
₹6.7 L Awaiting sanction · 39 daysRec. 23 Sep 2026DAGARUA PRAKAND ANTARGART DAGARUA PANCHAYAT KE GAUSIYA WARD KE CHORAH KE PASS. (14M) HIGH MAST LIGHT
Electricity & lightingLighting of public spaces· Purnia· #317129
₹6.7 L Awaiting sanction · 39 daysRec. 23 Sep 2026AMOUR PRAKHAND ANTARGAR BAKAUNIA PANCHAYAT KE DUBELI CHOWK ME. (14M) HIGH MAST LIGHT
Electricity & lightingLighting of public spaces· Purnia· #317130
₹6.7 L Awaiting sanction · 39 daysRec. 23 Sep 2026AMOUR PRAKHAND ANTARGART BANGARA MAHDIPUR PANCHAYAT KE MAHDIPUR CHOWK ME. (14M) HIGH MAST LIGHT
Electricity & lightingLighting of public spaces· Purnia· #317131
₹6.7 L Awaiting sanction · 39 daysRec. 23 Sep 2026AMOUR PRAKHAND ANTARGART BANGARA MAHDIPUR PANCHAYAT KE KARMANI HAAT ME. (14M) HIGH MAST LIGHT
Electricity & lightingLighting of public spaces· Purnia· #317133
₹6.7 L Awaiting sanction · 39 daysRec. 23 Sep 2026AMOUR PRAKHAND ANTARGAT NITANDAR PANCHAYAT KE BALUGANJ CHOWK ME. (14M) HIGH MAST LIGHT
Electricity & lightingLighting of public spaces· Purnia· #317134
₹6.7 L Awaiting sanction · 39 daysRec. 23 Sep 2026AMOUR PRAKHAND ANTARGAT DHURPAILI PANCHAYAT KE DHURPAILI DURGA MANDIR KE SAMNE. (14M) HIGH MAST LIGHT
Electricity & lightingLighting of public spaces· Purnia· #317135
₹6.7 L Awaiting sanction · 39 daysRec. 23 Sep 2026BAISA PRAKHAND ANTARGART KHAPRA PANCHAYAT KE KHAPRA HAAT ME. (14M) HIGH MAST LIGHT
Electricity & lightingLighting of public spaces· Purnia· #317136
₹6.7 L Awaiting sanction · 39 daysRec. 23 Sep 2026BAISA PRAKHAND ANTARGAR KANPHULIA PANCHAYAT KE FUTANI HAAT ME. (14M) HIGH MAST LIGHT
Electricity & lightingLighting of public spaces· Purnia· #317137
₹6.7 L Awaiting sanction · 39 daysRec. 23 Sep 2026BAISA PRAKHAND ANTARGAT MAJHOK PANCHAYAT KE MAJHOK HAAT ME. (14M) HIGH MAST LIGHT
Electricity & lightingLighting of public spaces· Purnia· #317139
₹6.7 L Awaiting sanction · 39 daysRec. 23 Sep 2026BAISA PRAKHAND ANTARGAT MANGARA PIAJI PANCHAYAT KE PIAJI CHOWK ME. (14M) HIGH MAST LIGHT
Electricity & lightingLighting of public spaces· Purnia· #317141
₹6.7 L Awaiting sanction · 39 daysRec. 23 Sep 2026BAISA PRAKHAND ANTARGAT MAJHOK PANCHAYAT KE CARAKPARA HAAT ME. (14M) HIGH MAST LIGHT
Electricity & lightingLighting of public spaces· Purnia· #317142
₹6.7 L Awaiting sanction · 39 daysRec. 23 Sep 2026BAISA PRAKHAND ANTARGAT MAJHOK PANCHAYAT KE MANGALPUR PURANI HAAT ME. (14M) HIGH MAST LIGHT
Electricity & lightingLighting of public spaces· Purnia· #317143
₹6.7 L Awaiting sanction · 39 daysRec. 23 Sep 2026
18th Lok Sabha MPs from Bihar
Ranked by MP score
| # | MP | Utilisation | Spent | Completed | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Raj Bhushan Choudhary · Muzaffarpur | 97% | 81% | 80 | 81 |
| 2 | Giridhari Yadav · Banka | 98% | 79% | 94 | 81 |
| 3 | Rajesh Verma · Khagaria | 56% | 52% | 67 | 79 |
| 4 | Jitan Ram Manjhi · Gaya | 77% | 46% | 194 | 78 |
| 5 | Arun Bharti · Jamui | 92% | 74% | 270 | 77 |
| 6 | Kaushalendra Kumar · Nalanda | 57% | 37% | 118 | 76 |
| 7 | Smt Veena Devi · Vaishali | 100% | 89% | 30 | 76 |
| 8 | Radha Mohan Singh · Purvi Champaran | 89% | 47% | 68 | 74 |
| 9 | Vijaylakshmi Devi · Siwan | 97% | 95% | 95 | 74 |
| 10 | Ravi Shankar Prasad · Patna Sahib | 48% | 40% | 60 | 72 |
| 11 | Dr Mohammad Jawed · Kishanganj | 89% | 65% | 130 | 72 |
| 12 | Ajay Kumar Mandal · Bhagalpur | 58% | 54% | 59 | 71 |
Source: MoSPI eSAKSHI (eSAKSHI API (mplads.mospi.gov.in)). Fund utilisation = works recommended ÷ allocated limit (MoSPI’s definition); spent = vendor payments ÷ allocated limit; completion = completed ÷ recommended works. The MP score weighs completion, spending efficiency, utilisation, proof of work, spending and vendor diversity. How it’s calculated.