67th of 80 from Uttar Pradesh
Allocated limit
₹14.70 Cr
Median ₹14.70 Cr
Fund utilisation
52%
₹7.69 Cr recommended · 94 works
Below median (76%)
Paid to vendors
₹4.45 Cr
30% of allocation
Below median (37%)
Works completed
33
35% of recommended
Above median (28%)
From recommendation to completion
Every work this MP recommended, by stage
- Recommended by the MP94 works
₹7.69 Cr · 52% of the ₹14.70 Cr allocated
- Sanctioned by the district83 works
88% sanctioned · took 3.0 months on average (due within 45 days)
- Completed33 works
₹2.62 Cr final cost · 5.0 months from recommendation on average
11 works are still awaiting sanction, 5 of them for more than 45 days.
In plain words
What the numbers say
- Recommended 94 works worth ₹7.69 Cr, a fund utilisation of 52%, higher than 15% of 18th Lok Sabha MPs.
- The district has sanctioned 83 of them, taking 3.0 months on average.
- ₹4.45 Cr has been paid to vendors, 30% of the allocation.
- 33 works are complete, typically 5.0 months after recommendation.
- The largest share of funds went to Roads & bridges.
- Payments went to 16 vendors. The largest received 33%.
- No citizen ratings have been reported for completed works.
How the score is made
MP score 41/100: finishing works counts most
- Works completed 30%35Completed ÷ recommended works.
- Spending efficiency 20%59Value of completed works ÷ money paid out. Money paid without works finished scores low.
- Fund utilisation 15%52Value of works recommended ÷ allocated limit (MoSPI’s measure).
- Proof of work 15%0Share of completed works with photos or documents uploaded on eSAKSHI.
- Funds spent 10%30Paid to vendors ÷ allocated limit.
- Vendor diversity 10%83How spread out payments are: full marks when no vendor gets over 20% of the money, none when one vendor gets everything.
i
Members of Parliament (MPs) do not have direct, operational control over the specific vendors selected for government public works. However, they exert significant indirect influence by shaping procurement frameworks, passing supplier diversity laws, and conducting oversight.
Largest vendor: JAY MAHAVEER INFRAVENTURE PRIVATE LIMITED, 33% of payments across 16 vendors.
District sanction speed
90/100 · sanction is the district authority’s job, so this doesn’t change the MP’s rank
- Sanction speed 100%90Average days to sanction (full marks within the 45-day guideline, none at a year), and the share of works not overdue.
Activity over time
Recommendations, payments and completions by month
Sectors
Value of works by category
Who got paid
Top vendors by payments received
Implementing district authorities
The districts that sanction and execute this MP’s works
Works
94 works · the 60 most recent are listed here, all of them in the explorer · tap “Photos” to see geo-tagged photos from eSAKSHI
Installation of CC TV Camera Police Station Baldev
Safety & securityProviding CCTV camera system for security of public areas· Mathura· #207136
₹7.3 L Work partially Completed · 23 Oct 2026Rec. 7 Jun 2025Paid ₹5.5 LShri Monu Kumar, son of Kishan, resident of 2355 Takhela Gali, Bharatpur Gate, Mathura 281001, for the work of getting both artificial legs attached
Divyang & social welfarePurchase of other aids / devices required for P/ M/ V/ H impaired for differently abled persons· Mathura· #284877
₹1.9 L Sanctioned · 23 Oct 2026Rec. 30 May 2026The work of fitting an artificial leg for Shri Rajababu, son of Shivcharan Goswami, resident near Panchayat House, Amar Colony, Girdharpur Road, Bakalpur, Mathura 281001.
Divyang & social welfarePurchase of other aids / devices required for P/ M/ V/ H impaired for differently abled persons· Mathura· #284878
₹96,000 Sanctioned · 23 Oct 2026Rec. 30 May 2026The task of fitting an artificial leg for Shri Nand Kishore, son of Mangala, resident of 130, Thana Baldev Sailkheda, Post Patloni, District Mathura 281301.
Divyang & social welfarePurchase of other aids / devices required for P/ M/ V/ H impaired for differently abled persons· Mathura· #284879
₹96,000 Sanctioned · 23 Oct 2026Rec. 30 May 2026The work of fitting an artificial leg for Mr. Pawan Kumar, resident of 168, Paitha, Govardhan, Mathura 281502.
Divyang & social welfarePurchase of other aids / devices required for P/ M/ V/ H impaired for differently abled persons· Mathura· #284881
₹96,000 Sanctioned · 23 Oct 2026Rec. 30 May 2026Mrs. Sunita, wife of Satish, resident of Khanpur, Chhata, Mathura 281401, is to get an artificial leg fitted.
Divyang & social welfarePurchase of other aids / devices required for P/ M/ V/ H impaired for differently abled persons· Mathura· #284882
₹2.3 L Sanctioned · 23 Oct 2026Rec. 30 May 2026The task of fitting an artificial leg for Mr. Sunil Kumar Sharma, resident of S A 1 804, Shri Radhe Valley, Govindpur Krishna Nagar, Mathura 281004.
Divyang & social welfarePurchase of other aids / devices required for P/ M/ V/ H impaired for differently abled persons· Mathura· #284884
₹2.1 L Sanctioned · 23 Oct 2026Rec. 30 May 2026The work of fitting an artificial leg for Mr. Sonu, son of Ompur, resident of Vesra Baikuth Rukmani, Bihar, Gol Chakkar, Vrindavan Bangar, Mathura 281121.
Divyang & social welfarePurchase of other aids / devices required for P/ M/ V/ H impaired for differently abled persons· Mathura· #284886
₹2.2 L Sanctioned · 23 Oct 2026Rec. 30 May 2026The work of fitting an artificial leg for Shri Dayaram, son of Babu, resident of Dautana, Chhata, Mathura 281401.
Divyang & social welfarePurchase of other aids / devices required for P/ M/ V/ H impaired for differently abled persons· Mathura· #284889
₹96,000 Sanctioned · 23 Oct 2026Rec. 30 May 2026The task of fitting an artificial leg for Shri Keshav Dev, son of Dulichand, resident of 3 G-4 Kashiram Colony, Rochi Banger, Mathura 281006.
Divyang & social welfarePurchase of other aids / devices required for P/ M/ V/ H impaired for differently abled persons· Mathura· #284891
₹96,000 Sanctioned · 23 Oct 2026Rec. 30 May 2026The work of fitting an artificial leg for Mr. Arun Sharma, son of Ram Kumar Sharma, resident of 209 197, Laxmi Nagar, Krishna Nagar, Mathura 281004.
Divyang & social welfarePurchase of other aids / devices required for P/ M/ V/ H impaired for differently abled persons· Mathura· #284893
₹96,000 Sanctioned · 23 Oct 2026Rec. 30 May 2026Pooja Sharma assigned Lokesh Kumar Sharma, resident of F 927, near Govind Nagar Police Station, Mathura 281001, the task of getting an artificial leg fitted.
Divyang & social welfarePurchase of other aids / devices required for P/ M/ V/ H impaired for differently abled persons· Mathura· #284894
₹96,000 Sanctioned · 23 Oct 2026Rec. 30 May 2026The task of fitting an artificial leg for Shri Bani Singh Badhw Dori Lal, resident of Preeti Bihar Kalauni, Lohavan, Mathura 281204.
Divyang & social welfarePurchase of other aids / devices required for P/ M/ V/ H impaired for differently abled persons· Mathura· #284896
₹96,000 Sanctioned · 23 Oct 2026Rec. 30 May 2026The work of fitting an artificial leg for Shri Tulsidas, son of Mandaram, resident of Tehra, District Mathura, Prem Nagar 281003.
Divyang & social welfarePurchase of other aids / devices required for P/ M/ V/ H impaired for differently abled persons· Mathura· #284897
₹96,000 Sanctioned · 23 Oct 2026Rec. 30 May 2026Shri Vasudev, son Ramesh Chand, resident of 3727 Sarayashi, Kosi Kalan, Mathura 281403, for the work of fitting both artificial legs.
Divyang & social welfarePurchase of other aids / devices required for P/ M/ V/ H impaired for differently abled persons· Mathura· #284899
₹3.1 L Sanctioned · 23 Oct 2026Rec. 30 May 2026
18th Lok Sabha MPs from Uttar Pradesh
Ranked by MP score
| # | MP | Utilisation | Spent | Completed | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Shri Narendra Modi · Varanasi | 62% | 60% | 207 | 89 |
| 2 | Rajkumar Chahar · Fatehpur Sikri | 90% | 71% | 45 | 84 |
| 3 | Awadhesh Prasad · Faizabad | 98% | 65% | 143 | 84 |
| 4 | Utkarsh Verma Madhur · Kheri | 85% | 53% | 349 | 83 |
| 5 | Shri Arun Kumar Sagar · Shahjahanpur | 100% | 94% | 5 | 83 |
| 6 | Vinod Kumar Bind · Bhadohi | 81% | 58% | 525 | 82 |
| 7 | Ramesh Awasthi · Kanpur | 84% | 57% | 104 | 79 |
| 8 | Babu Singh Kushwaha · Jaunpur | 79% | 39% | 622 | 78 |
| 9 | Daroga Prasad Saroj · Lalganj | 65% | 56% | 212 | 76 |
| 10 | Mohibbullah · Rampur | 75% | 51% | 318 | 76 |
| 11 | Neeraj Maurya · Aonla | 100% | 91% | 17 | 75 |
| 12 | Mukesh Rajput · Farrukhabad | 99% | 91% | 246 | 74 |
Source: MoSPI eSAKSHI (eSAKSHI API (mplads.mospi.gov.in)). Fund utilisation = works recommended ÷ allocated limit (MoSPI’s definition); spent = vendor payments ÷ allocated limit; completion = completed ÷ recommended works. The MP score weighs completion, spending efficiency, utilisation, proof of work, spending and vendor diversity. How it’s calculated.