33rd of 39 from Tamil Nadu
Allocated limit
₹17.15 Cr
Median ₹14.70 Cr
Fund utilisation
81%
₹13.90 Cr recommended · 118 works
Above median (76%)
Paid to vendors
₹8.31 Cr
48% of allocation
Above median (37%)
Works completed
43
36% of recommended
Above median (28%)
From recommendation to completion
Every work this MP recommended, by stage
- Recommended by the MP118 works
₹13.90 Cr · 81% of the ₹17.15 Cr allocated
- Sanctioned by the district84 works
71% sanctioned · took 7.2 months on average (due within 45 days)
- Completed43 works
₹3.91 Cr final cost · 9.9 months from recommendation on average
34 works are still awaiting sanction, 18 of them for more than 45 days.
In plain words
What the numbers say
- Recommended 118 works worth ₹13.90 Cr, a fund utilisation of 81%, higher than 58% of 18th Lok Sabha MPs.
- The district has sanctioned 84 of them, taking 7.2 months on average.
- ₹8.31 Cr has been paid to vendors, 48% of the allocation.
- 43 works are complete, typically 9.9 months after recommendation. 28 works have geo-tagged photos on eSAKSHI.
- The largest share of funds went to Education & libraries.
- Payments went to 38 vendors. The largest received 33%.
- No citizen ratings have been reported for completed works.
How the score is made
MP score 55/100: finishing works counts most
- Works completed 30%36Completed ÷ recommended works.
- Spending efficiency 20%47Value of completed works ÷ money paid out. Money paid without works finished scores low.
- Fund utilisation 15%81Value of works recommended ÷ allocated limit (MoSPI’s measure).
- Proof of work 15%65Share of completed works with photos or documents uploaded on eSAKSHI.
- Funds spent 10%48Paid to vendors ÷ allocated limit.
- Vendor diversity 10%83How spread out payments are: full marks when no vendor gets over 20% of the money, none when one vendor gets everything.
i
Members of Parliament (MPs) do not have direct, operational control over the specific vendors selected for government public works. However, they exert significant indirect influence by shaping procurement frameworks, passing supplier diversity laws, and conducting oversight.
Largest vendor: R CHANDRASEKARAN, 33% of payments across 38 vendors.
District sanction speed
65/100 · sanction is the district authority’s job, so this doesn’t change the MP’s rank
- Sanction speed 100%65Average days to sanction (full marks within the 45-day guideline, none at a year), and the share of works not overdue.
Activity over time
Recommendations, payments and completions by month
Sectors
Value of works by category
Who got paid
Top vendors by payments received
Implementing district authorities
The districts that sanction and execute this MP’s works
Works
118 works · the 60 most recent are listed here, all of them in the explorer · tap “Photos” to see geo-tagged photos from eSAKSHI
kurumpanai OHD tank
Drinking waterConstruction of water tanks· Kanniyakumari· #325043
₹25.0 L Awaiting sanction · 2 daysRec. 30 Oct 2026Surulucode solar hymas light
Electricity & lightingLighting of public spaces· Kanniyakumari· #325044
₹7.5 L Awaiting sanction · 2 daysRec. 30 Oct 2026Erachakulam Solar hymas light
Electricity & lightingLighting of public spaces· Kanniyakumari· #325045
₹7.5 L Awaiting sanction · 2 daysRec. 30 Oct 2026Thovalai vilakku Solar hymas light
Electricity & lightingLighting of public spaces· Kanniyakumari· #325046
₹7.5 L Awaiting sanction · 2 daysRec. 30 Oct 2026Mekkamandapam santhai Solar hymas light
Electricity & lightingLighting of public spaces· Kanniyakumari· #325047
₹7.5 L Awaiting sanction · 2 daysRec. 30 Oct 2026Thovalai kamarajar saalai santhippu solar hymas light
Electricity & lightingLighting of public spaces· Kanniyakumari· #325048
₹7.5 L Awaiting sanction · 2 daysRec. 30 Oct 2026Madhusoodanapuram solar hymas light
Electricity & lightingLighting of public spaces· Kanniyakumari· #325049
₹7.5 L Awaiting sanction · 2 daysRec. 30 Oct 2026Agastheeswaram mutharaman kovil Arugil Solar hymas light
Electricity & lightingLighting of public spaces· Kanniyakumari· #325050
₹7.5 L Awaiting sanction · 2 daysRec. 30 Oct 2026Muttom Ooratchi Anthoniyaar kurusady paguthiyil meenavar oyivu arai
Community buildings & public spacesConstruction of common work sheds / common covered sitting area· Kanniyakumari· #325051
₹10.0 L Awaiting sanction · 2 daysRec. 30 Oct 2026Arasu palli pinpuram vialyattu thalam amithal
Sports & fitnessDevelopment of playfields and sports grounds· Kanniyakumari· #325052
₹20.0 L Awaiting sanction · 2 daysRec. 30 Oct 2026keralapuram bus shed
Community buildings & public spacesConstruction of bus-sheds or bus-stops· Kanniyakumari· #325053
₹5.0 L Awaiting sanction · 2 daysRec. 30 Oct 2026Kuruthancode paguthiyil podhu kalipeedam paguthiyil kottagai amaithal
Community buildings & public spacesConstruction of common work sheds / common covered sitting area· Kanniyakumari· #325054
₹23.5 L Awaiting sanction · 2 daysRec. 30 Oct 2026vadakku konam alangara tharai karkal
Roads & bridgesConstruction of roads, link roads, pathways or any other road with or without drainage system· Kanniyakumari· #325055
₹5.0 L Awaiting sanction · 2 daysRec. 30 Oct 2026Kristhu nagaril ration shop
Safety & securityConstruction of Government office buildings (Post office, Police station, Police chauki, etc.)· Kanniyakumari· #325056
₹15.0 L Awaiting sanction · 2 daysRec. 30 Oct 2026construction of Bus Sheds near EB office.
Community buildings & public spacesConstruction of bus-sheds or bus-stops· Kanniyakumari· #325057
₹5.0 L Awaiting sanction · 2 daysRec. 30 Oct 2026
18th Lok Sabha MPs from Tamil Nadu
Ranked by MP score
| # | MP | Utilisation | Spent | Completed | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dr Rani Sri Kumar · Tenkasi | 88% | 66% | 117 | 83 |
| 2 | V S Matheswaran · Namakkal | 79% | 62% | 150 | 82 |
| 3 | Tharaniventhan M S · Arani | 94% | 67% | 203 | 81 |
| 4 | Manickam Tagore B · Virudhunagar | 65% | 63% | 69 | 80 |
| 5 | Ganesan Selvam · Kancheepuram | 91% | 59% | 278 | 80 |
| 6 | CN Annadurai · Tiruvannamalai | 71% | 62% | 175 | 79 |
| 7 | K Subbarayan · Tiruppur | 94% | 57% | 65 | 76 |
| 8 | Gopinath K · Krishnagiri | 57% | 34% | 67 | 76 |
| 9 | Robert Bruce C · Tirunelveli | 95% | 49% | 76 | 76 |
| 10 | K E Prakash · Erode | 78% | 59% | 141 | 75 |
| 11 | M.K. Vishnuprasad · Cuddalore | 70% | 53% | 74 | 74 |
| 12 | Murasoli S · Thanjavur | 97% | 54% | 48 | 74 |
Source: MoSPI eSAKSHI (eSAKSHI API (mplads.mospi.gov.in)). Fund utilisation = works recommended ÷ allocated limit (MoSPI’s definition); spent = vendor payments ÷ allocated limit; completion = completed ÷ recommended works. The MP score weighs completion, spending efficiency, utilisation, proof of work, spending and vendor diversity. How it’s calculated.