8th of 39 from Tamil Nadu
Allocated limit
₹14.93 Cr
Median ₹14.70 Cr
Fund utilisation
57%
₹8.57 Cr recommended · 96 works
Below median (76%)
Paid to vendors
₹5.08 Cr
34% of allocation
Below median (37%)
Works completed
67
70% of recommended
Above median (28%)
From recommendation to completion
Every work this MP recommended, by stage
- Recommended by the MP96 works
₹8.57 Cr · 57% of the ₹14.93 Cr allocated
- Sanctioned by the district93 works
97% sanctioned · took 3.7 months on average (due within 45 days)
- Completed67 works
₹5.08 Cr final cost · 9.6 months from recommendation on average
3 works are still awaiting sanction, 3 of them for more than 45 days.
In plain words
What the numbers say
- Recommended 96 works worth ₹8.57 Cr, a fund utilisation of 57%, higher than 19% of 18th Lok Sabha MPs.
- The district has sanctioned 93 of them, taking 3.7 months on average.
- ₹5.08 Cr has been paid to vendors, 34% of the allocation.
- 67 works are complete, typically 9.6 months after recommendation. 67 works have geo-tagged photos on eSAKSHI.
- The largest share of funds went to Drinking water.
- Payments went to 17 vendors. The largest received 35%.
- No citizen ratings have been reported for completed works.
How the score is made
MP score 76/100: finishing works counts most
- Works completed 30%70Completed ÷ recommended works.
- Spending efficiency 20%100Value of completed works ÷ money paid out. Money paid without works finished scores low.
- Fund utilisation 15%57Value of works recommended ÷ allocated limit (MoSPI’s measure).
- Proof of work 15%100Share of completed works with photos or documents uploaded on eSAKSHI.
- Funds spent 10%34Paid to vendors ÷ allocated limit.
- Vendor diversity 10%82How spread out payments are: full marks when no vendor gets over 20% of the money, none when one vendor gets everything.
i
Members of Parliament (MPs) do not have direct, operational control over the specific vendors selected for government public works. However, they exert significant indirect influence by shaping procurement frameworks, passing supplier diversity laws, and conducting oversight.
Largest vendor: Sri Vaari Total Gaz Distributors, 35% of payments across 17 vendors.
District sanction speed
88/100 · sanction is the district authority’s job, so this doesn’t change the MP’s rank
- Sanction speed 100%88Average days to sanction (full marks within the 45-day guideline, none at a year), and the share of works not overdue.
Activity over time
Recommendations, payments and completions by month
Sectors
Value of works by category
Who got paid
Top vendors by payments received
Implementing district authorities
The districts that sanction and execute this MP’s works
Works
96 works · the 60 most recent are listed here, all of them in the explorer · tap “Photos” to see geo-tagged photos from eSAKSHI
CC Pavement at Dinnur in Kuppatti Pt.
Roads & bridgesConstruction of roads, link roads, pathways or any other road with or without drainage system· Krishnagiri· #250876
₹2.5 L Completed 8 Oct 2026Rec. 14 Dec 2025Paid ₹2.5 LCC Pavement from Raja House to Veerappa House in Oddarpalayam in Choodasandiram Pt. in Thally
Roads & bridgesConstruction of roads, link roads, pathways or any other road with or without drainage system· Krishnagiri· #250878
₹3.0 L Completed 8 Oct 2026Rec. 14 Dec 2025Paid ₹3.0 LInstallation of 16 mts. Hi mast Light at 15th Ward in HCMC
Electricity & lightingStreet lights· Krishnagiri· #260589
₹6.1 L Completed 8 Oct 2026Rec. 21 Jan 2026Paid ₹6.1 LInstallation of 16 mts. Hi mast Light at MG Road X Road in HCMC
Electricity & lightingStreet lights· Krishnagiri· #260591
₹6.1 L Completed 8 Oct 2026Rec. 21 Jan 2026Paid ₹6.1 LInstallation of 16 mts. Hi mast Light at Mullai Nagar in 29th Ward in HCMC
Electricity & lightingStreet lights· Krishnagiri· #260592
₹6.1 L Completed 8 Oct 2026Rec. 21 Jan 2026Paid ₹6.1 LInstallation of 16 mts. Hi mast Light at Muneeswar Nagar Ring Road, 5th Cross in HCMC
Electricity & lightingStreet lights· Krishnagiri· #260593
₹6.1 L Completed 8 Oct 2026Rec. 21 Jan 2026Paid ₹6.1 LInstallation of 16 mts. Hi mast Light at Mynja Petrol Pump in HCMC
Electricity & lightingStreet lights· Krishnagiri· #260594
₹6.1 L Completed 8 Oct 2026Rec. 21 Jan 2026Paid ₹6.1 LInstallation of 16 mts. Hi mast Light at SBM Colony, Primary Health Centre in HCMC
Electricity & lightingStreet lights· Krishnagiri· #260595
₹6.1 L Completed 8 Oct 2026Rec. 21 Jan 2026Paid ₹6.1 LInstallation of 16 mts. Hi mast Light at Thally Road near Railway Gate in HCMC
Electricity & lightingStreet lights· Krishnagiri· #260596
₹6.1 L Completed 8 Oct 2026Rec. 21 Jan 2026Paid ₹6.1 LInstallation of 16 mts. Hi mast Light at Venkateswara Layout HM in 38th Ward
Electricity & lightingStreet lights· Krishnagiri· #260597
₹6.1 L Completed 8 Oct 2026Rec. 21 Jan 2026Paid ₹6.1 LInstallation of 20 mts. Hi mast Light at Shanthi Nagar RC Church Roundana in HCMC
Electricity & lightingStreet lights· Krishnagiri· #260599
₹9.9 L Completed 8 Oct 2026Rec. 21 Jan 2026Paid ₹9.9 LInstallation of RO Plant (1000 LPH) at Fathima School in Krishnagiri Municipality
Drinking waterInstalling community drinking water plants· Krishnagiri· #260601
₹9.8 L Completed 8 Oct 2026Rec. 21 Jan 2026Paid ₹9.8 LProviding Benches and Desks 40 Nos to Sokkarasanapalli GHSS in Sevaganapalli Pt.
Education & librariesPurchase of furniture and fixtures for educational purposes· Krishnagiri· #303817
₹5.9 L Completed 8 Oct 2026Rec. 14 Aug 2026Paid ₹5.9 LProviding Benches and Desks 40 Nos to GBHSS in Hosur
Education & librariesPurchase of furniture and fixtures for educational purposes· Krishnagiri· #303818
₹5.9 L Completed 8 Oct 2026Rec. 14 Aug 2026Paid ₹5.9 LProviding Benches and Desks 40 Nos to Bagalur GGHS.
Education & librariesPurchase of furniture and fixtures for educational purposes· Krishnagiri· #303822
₹5.9 L Completed 8 Oct 2026Rec. 14 Aug 2026Paid ₹5.9 L
18th Lok Sabha MPs from Tamil Nadu
Ranked by MP score
| # | MP | Utilisation | Spent | Completed | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dr Rani Sri Kumar · Tenkasi | 88% | 66% | 117 | 83 |
| 2 | V S Matheswaran · Namakkal | 79% | 62% | 150 | 82 |
| 3 | Tharaniventhan M S · Arani | 94% | 67% | 203 | 81 |
| 4 | Manickam Tagore B · Virudhunagar | 65% | 63% | 69 | 80 |
| 5 | Ganesan Selvam · Kancheepuram | 91% | 59% | 278 | 80 |
| 6 | CN Annadurai · Tiruvannamalai | 71% | 62% | 175 | 79 |
| 7 | K Subbarayan · Tiruppur | 94% | 57% | 65 | 76 |
| 8 | Gopinath K · Krishnagiri | 57% | 34% | 67 | 76 |
| 9 | Robert Bruce C · Tirunelveli | 95% | 49% | 76 | 76 |
| 10 | K E Prakash · Erode | 78% | 59% | 141 | 75 |
| 11 | M.K. Vishnuprasad · Cuddalore | 70% | 53% | 74 | 74 |
| 12 | Murasoli S · Thanjavur | 97% | 54% | 48 | 74 |
Source: MoSPI eSAKSHI (eSAKSHI API (mplads.mospi.gov.in)). Fund utilisation = works recommended ÷ allocated limit (MoSPI’s definition); spent = vendor payments ÷ allocated limit; completion = completed ÷ recommended works. The MP score weighs completion, spending efficiency, utilisation, proof of work, spending and vendor diversity. How it’s calculated.