23rd of 29 from Madhya Pradesh
Allocated limit
₹14.90 Cr
Median ₹14.70 Cr
Fund utilisation
38%
₹5.66 Cr recommended · 320 works
Below median (76%)
Paid to vendors
₹2.69 Cr
18% of allocation
Below median (37%)
Works completed
60
19% of recommended
Below median (28%)
From recommendation to completion
Every work this MP recommended, by stage
- Recommended by the MP320 works
₹5.66 Cr · 38% of the ₹14.90 Cr allocated
- Sanctioned by the district214 works
67% sanctioned · took 5.3 months on average (due within 45 days)
- Completed60 works
₹89.9 L final cost · 15.5 months from recommendation on average
106 works are still awaiting sanction, 97 of them for more than 45 days.
In plain words
What the numbers say
- Recommended 320 works worth ₹5.66 Cr, a fund utilisation of 38%, higher than 6.7% of 18th Lok Sabha MPs.
- The district has sanctioned 214 of them, taking 5.3 months on average.
- ₹2.69 Cr has been paid to vendors, 18% of the allocation.
- 60 works are complete, typically 15.5 months after recommendation. 59 works have geo-tagged photos on eSAKSHI.
- The largest share of funds went to Community buildings & public spaces.
- Payments went to 35 vendors. The largest received 22%.
- No citizen ratings have been reported for completed works.
How the score is made
MP score 44/100: finishing works counts most
- Works completed 30%19Completed ÷ recommended works.
- Spending efficiency 20%33Value of completed works ÷ money paid out. Money paid without works finished scores low.
- Fund utilisation 15%38Value of works recommended ÷ allocated limit (MoSPI’s measure).
- Proof of work 15%98Share of completed works with photos or documents uploaded on eSAKSHI.
- Funds spent 10%18Paid to vendors ÷ allocated limit.
- Vendor diversity 10%98How spread out payments are: full marks when no vendor gets over 20% of the money, none when one vendor gets everything.
i
Members of Parliament (MPs) do not have direct, operational control over the specific vendors selected for government public works. However, they exert significant indirect influence by shaping procurement frameworks, passing supplier diversity laws, and conducting oversight.
Largest vendor: CEO JANPAD PANCHAYAT MANDSAUR, 22% of payments across 35 vendors.
District sanction speed
66/100 · sanction is the district authority’s job, so this doesn’t change the MP’s rank
- Sanction speed 100%66Average days to sanction (full marks within the 45-day guideline, none at a year), and the share of works not overdue.
Activity over time
Recommendations, payments and completions by month
Sectors
Value of works by category
Who got paid
Top vendors by payments received
Implementing district authorities
The districts that sanction and execute this MP’s works
Works
320 works · the 60 most recent are listed here, all of them in the explorer · tap “Photos” to see geo-tagged photos from eSAKSHI
construction of cc road
Roads & bridgesConstruction of roads, link roads, pathways or any other road with or without drainage system· Neemuch· #284073
₹2.0 L Sanctioned · 30 Oct 2026Rec. 27 May 2026construction of tin shed
Community buildings & public spacesConstruction of common work sheds / common covered sitting area· Ratlam· #314576
₹2.0 L Sanctioned · 30 Oct 2026Rec. 12 Sep 2026CONSTRUCTION OF HALL
Community buildings & public spacesConstruction of community centers and community halls· Ratlam· #314726
₹3.0 L Sanctioned · 30 Oct 2026Rec. 13 Sep 2026for pewar block
Roads & bridgesConstruction of footpaths and pedestrian ways· Neemuch· #314559
₹2.0 L Time Estimation · 29 Oct 2026Rec. 12 Sep 2026CONSTRUCTION OF CC ROAD
Roads & bridgesConstruction of roads, link roads, pathways or any other road with or without drainage system· Neemuch· #314715
₹2.0 L Time Estimation · 28 Oct 2026Rec. 13 Sep 2026construction of cc road
Roads & bridgesConstruction of roads, link roads, pathways or any other road with or without drainage system· Neemuch· #314569
₹2.0 L Sanctioned · 21 Oct 2026Rec. 12 Sep 2026construction of cc road
Roads & bridgesConstruction of roads, link roads, pathways or any other road with or without drainage system· Mandsaur· #277517
₹1.3 L Vendor Identification · 14 Oct 2026Rec. 5 Apr 2026Paid ₹65,000CONSTRUCTION OF ROOM
Community buildings & public spacesConstruction of additional rooms and halls in the existing public and community building· Mandsaur· #322149
₹2.5 L Awaiting sanction · 19 daysRec. 13 Oct 2026CONSTRTUCTION OF ROOM
Community buildings & public spacesConstruction of additional rooms and halls in the existing public and community building· Mandsaur· #322176
₹3.0 L Awaiting sanction · 19 daysRec. 13 Oct 2026CONSTRUCTION OF HALL
Community buildings & public spacesConstruction of community centers and community halls· Neemuch· #322178
₹5.0 L Awaiting sanction · 19 daysRec. 13 Oct 2026CONSTRUCTION OF HALL
Community buildings & public spacesConstruction of additional rooms and halls in the existing public and community building· Neemuch· #322187
₹3.0 L Awaiting sanction · 19 daysRec. 13 Oct 2026CONSTUCTION OF ROOMS
Community buildings & public spacesConstruction of additional rooms and halls in the existing public and community building· Neemuch· #322192
₹3.0 L Awaiting sanction · 19 daysRec. 13 Oct 2026CONSTRUCTION OF CC RAD
Roads & bridgesConstruction of roads, link roads, pathways or any other road with or without drainage system· Mandsaur· #322196
₹4.0 L Awaiting sanction · 19 daysRec. 13 Oct 2026PURCHASE OF TRICYCLY
Community buildings & public spacesConstruction of cycle tracks, cycle stand and segregated non-motorized vehicle (NMV) lanes· Neemuch· #322212
₹42,000 Awaiting sanction · 19 daysRec. 13 Oct 2026CONSTRUCTION OF HALL
Community buildings & public spacesConstruction of buildings for community cultural activities· Mandsaur· #322222
₹2.5 L Awaiting sanction · 19 daysRec. 13 Oct 2026
18th Lok Sabha MPs from Madhya Pradesh
Ranked by MP score
| # | MP | Utilisation | Spent | Completed | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Durga Das Uikey · Betul | 99% | 57% | 288 | 75 |
| 2 | Gyaneshwar Patil · Khandwa | 87% | 58% | 233 | 73 |
| 3 | Dr. Lata Wankhede · Sagar | 97% | 75% | 113 | 73 |
| 4 | Jyotiraditya M. Scindia · Guna | 62% | 38% | 46 | 73 |
| 5 | Shri Anil Firojiya · Ujjain | 68% | 56% | 160 | 71 |
| 6 | Bharti Pardhi · Balaghat | 82% | 61% | 115 | 71 |
| 7 | Savitri Thakur · Dhar | 95% | 64% | 179 | 68 |
| 8 | Rahul Singh Lodhi · Damoh | 54% | 45% | 188 | 67 |
| 9 | Shankar Lalwani · Indore | 94% | 55% | 145 | 67 |
| 10 | Dr. Rajesh Mishra · Sidhi | 92% | 72% | 172 | 59 |
| 11 | Alok Sharma · Bhopal | 85% | 49% | 24 | 55 |
| 12 | Rodmal Nagar · Rajgarh | 100% | 65% | 54 | 54 |
Source: MoSPI eSAKSHI (eSAKSHI API (mplads.mospi.gov.in)). Fund utilisation = works recommended ÷ allocated limit (MoSPI’s definition); spent = vendor payments ÷ allocated limit; completion = completed ÷ recommended works. The MP score weighs completion, spending efficiency, utilisation, proof of work, spending and vendor diversity. How it’s calculated.