26th of 29 from Madhya Pradesh
Allocated limit
₹14.70 Cr
Median ₹14.70 Cr
Fund utilisation
45%
₹6.60 Cr recommended · 120 works
Below median (76%)
Paid to vendors
₹4.08 Cr
28% of allocation
Below median (37%)
Works completed
10
8.3% of recommended
Below median (28%)
From recommendation to completion
Every work this MP recommended, by stage
- Recommended by the MP120 works
₹6.60 Cr · 45% of the ₹14.70 Cr allocated
- Sanctioned by the district81 works
68% sanctioned · took 3.6 months on average (due within 45 days)
- Completed10 works
₹64.4 L final cost · 9.3 months from recommendation on average
39 works are still awaiting sanction, 26 of them for more than 45 days.
In plain words
What the numbers say
- Recommended 120 works worth ₹6.60 Cr, a fund utilisation of 45%, higher than 9.4% of 18th Lok Sabha MPs.
- The district has sanctioned 81 of them, taking 3.6 months on average.
- ₹4.08 Cr has been paid to vendors, 28% of the allocation.
- 10 works are complete, typically 9.3 months after recommendation. 10 works have geo-tagged photos on eSAKSHI.
- The largest share of funds went to Community buildings & public spaces.
- Payments went to 71 vendors. The largest received 7.6%.
- No citizen ratings have been reported for completed works.
How the score is made
MP score 40/100: finishing works counts most
- Works completed 30%8Completed ÷ recommended works.
- Spending efficiency 20%16Value of completed works ÷ money paid out. Money paid without works finished scores low.
- Fund utilisation 15%45Value of works recommended ÷ allocated limit (MoSPI’s measure).
- Proof of work 15%100Share of completed works with photos or documents uploaded on eSAKSHI.
- Funds spent 10%28Paid to vendors ÷ allocated limit.
- Vendor diversity 10%100How spread out payments are: full marks when no vendor gets over 20% of the money, none when one vendor gets everything.
i
Members of Parliament (MPs) do not have direct, operational control over the specific vendors selected for government public works. However, they exert significant indirect influence by shaping procurement frameworks, passing supplier diversity laws, and conducting oversight.
Largest vendor: CEO JANPAD KHATEGAON, 7.6% of payments across 71 vendors.
District sanction speed
79/100 · sanction is the district authority’s job, so this doesn’t change the MP’s rank
- Sanction speed 100%79Average days to sanction (full marks within the 45-day guideline, none at a year), and the share of works not overdue.
Activity over time
Recommendations, payments and completions by month
Sectors
Value of works by category
Who got paid
Top vendors by payments received
Implementing district authorities
The districts that sanction and execute this MP’s works
Works
120 works · the 60 most recent are listed here, all of them in the explorer · tap “Photos” to see geo-tagged photos from eSAKSHI
gram jait me toilet nirmaan tin shed and boundrywall work
Sanitation & drainageConstruction of public toilets and bathrooms· Sehore· #293926
₹10.0 L Vendor Identification · 28 Oct 2026Rec. 10 Jul 2026Paid ₹5.0 Lkushwaha mahasabha samiti raisen kush manglik bhawan
Community buildings & public spacesConstruction of community centers and community halls· Raisen· #320145
₹5.0 L Awaiting sanction · 27 daysRec. 5 Oct 2026govt. adarsh kanya uchtar madhyamik vidhyalay
Community buildings & public spacesConstruction of additional rooms and halls in the existing public and community building· Raisen· #320149
₹2.0 L Awaiting sanction · 27 daysRec. 5 Oct 2026govt girls college raisen shed nirman
Sports & fitnessDevelopment of playground· Raisen· #320150
₹2.0 L Awaiting sanction · 27 daysRec. 5 Oct 2026LN/MP18375/2024-2025/10 addition amount to this work
OtherInstallation/ Construction of Anti-Pollution structure· Sehore· #320153
₹1.3 L Awaiting sanction · 27 daysRec. 5 Oct 2026narmada tat par chabutra and shed nirman
Community buildings & public spacesConstruction of common work sheds / common covered sitting area· Sehore· #320156
₹2.0 L Awaiting sanction · 27 daysRec. 5 Oct 2026teen shed and chabutra nirman
Community buildings & public spacesConstruction of common work sheds / common covered sitting area· Sehore· #320157
₹2.0 L Awaiting sanction · 27 daysRec. 5 Oct 2026maa narmada nemawar gehlot mewad rajput samaj dharmshala nirman
Community buildings & public spacesConstruction of community centers and community halls· Dewas· #320166
₹5.0 L Awaiting sanction · 27 daysRec. 5 Oct 2026ward no 9 gurjar gond brahman samaj dharmshala nirman
Community buildings & public spacesConstruction of community centers and community halls· Dewas· #320167
₹5.0 L Awaiting sanction · 27 daysRec. 5 Oct 2026teen shed and chabutra nirman
Community buildings & public spacesConstruction of common work sheds / common covered sitting area· Sehore· #320169
₹2.0 L Awaiting sanction · 27 daysRec. 5 Oct 2026sakharam ke ghar ke pas teen shed chabutra nirman
Community buildings & public spacesConstruction of common work sheds / common covered sitting area· Sehore· #320170
₹2.0 L Awaiting sanction · 27 daysRec. 5 Oct 2026bai bodi bus stand par teen shed chabutra
Community buildings & public spacesConstruction of common work sheds / common covered sitting area· Sehore· #320172
₹2.0 L Awaiting sanction · 27 daysRec. 5 Oct 2026bhairu baba ke pas teen shed chabutra
Community buildings & public spacesConstruction of common work sheds / common covered sitting area· Sehore· #320173
₹2.0 L Awaiting sanction · 27 daysRec. 5 Oct 2026mangrol me 345m CC road
Roads & bridgesConstruction of roads, link roads, pathways or any other road with or without drainage system· Sehore· #320174
₹3.0 L Awaiting sanction · 27 daysRec. 5 Oct 2026gram panchayat tijalpur me suresh ke ghar se jagdish yadav ke ghar tak CC road
Roads & bridgesConstruction of roads, link roads, pathways or any other road with or without drainage system· Raisen· #286818
₹2.0 L Vendor Identification · 15 Sept 2026Rec. 18 Jun 2026Paid ₹1.0 L
18th Lok Sabha MPs from Madhya Pradesh
Ranked by MP score
| # | MP | Utilisation | Spent | Completed | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Durga Das Uikey · Betul | 99% | 57% | 288 | 75 |
| 2 | Gyaneshwar Patil · Khandwa | 87% | 58% | 233 | 73 |
| 3 | Dr. Lata Wankhede · Sagar | 97% | 75% | 113 | 73 |
| 4 | Jyotiraditya M. Scindia · Guna | 62% | 38% | 46 | 73 |
| 5 | Shri Anil Firojiya · Ujjain | 68% | 56% | 160 | 71 |
| 6 | Bharti Pardhi · Balaghat | 82% | 61% | 115 | 71 |
| 7 | Savitri Thakur · Dhar | 95% | 64% | 179 | 68 |
| 8 | Rahul Singh Lodhi · Damoh | 54% | 45% | 188 | 67 |
| 9 | Shankar Lalwani · Indore | 94% | 55% | 145 | 67 |
| 10 | Dr. Rajesh Mishra · Sidhi | 92% | 72% | 172 | 59 |
| 11 | Alok Sharma · Bhopal | 85% | 49% | 24 | 55 |
| 12 | Rodmal Nagar · Rajgarh | 100% | 65% | 54 | 54 |
Source: MoSPI eSAKSHI (eSAKSHI API (mplads.mospi.gov.in)). Fund utilisation = works recommended ÷ allocated limit (MoSPI’s definition); spent = vendor payments ÷ allocated limit; completion = completed ÷ recommended works. The MP score weighs completion, spending efficiency, utilisation, proof of work, spending and vendor diversity. How it’s calculated.