34th of 40 from Bihar
Works waiting for sanction
75 recommended works are still awaiting sanction more than 45 days later. Sanction is the district authority’s responsibility.
Allocated limit
₹14.70 Cr
Median ₹14.70 Cr
Fund utilisation
99%
₹14.52 Cr recommended · 171 works
Above median (76%)
Paid to vendors
₹8.90 Cr
61% of allocation
Above median (37%)
Works completed
46
27% of recommended
About the median
From recommendation to completion
Every work this MP recommended, by stage
- Recommended by the MP171 works
₹14.52 Cr · 99% of the ₹14.70 Cr allocated
- Sanctioned by the district96 works
56% sanctioned · took 3.8 months on average (due within 45 days)
- Completed46 works
₹4.78 Cr final cost · 6.8 months from recommendation on average
75 works are still awaiting sanction, 75 of them for more than 45 days.
In plain words
What the numbers say
- Recommended 171 works worth ₹14.52 Cr, a fund utilisation of 99%, higher than 92% of 18th Lok Sabha MPs.
- The district has sanctioned 96 of them, taking 3.8 months on average.
- ₹8.90 Cr has been paid to vendors, 61% of the allocation.
- 46 works are complete, typically 6.8 months after recommendation. 4 works have geo-tagged photos on eSAKSHI.
- The largest share of funds went to Electricity & lighting.
- Payments went to 7 vendors. The largest received 41%.
- No citizen ratings have been reported for completed works.
How the score is made
MP score 48/100: finishing works counts most
- Works completed 30%27Completed ÷ recommended works.
- Spending efficiency 20%54Value of completed works ÷ money paid out. Money paid without works finished scores low.
- Fund utilisation 15%99Value of works recommended ÷ allocated limit (MoSPI’s measure).
- Proof of work 15%9Share of completed works with photos or documents uploaded on eSAKSHI.
- Funds spent 10%61Paid to vendors ÷ allocated limit.
- Vendor diversity 10%74How spread out payments are: full marks when no vendor gets over 20% of the money, none when one vendor gets everything.
i
Members of Parliament (MPs) do not have direct, operational control over the specific vendors selected for government public works. However, they exert significant indirect influence by shaping procurement frameworks, passing supplier diversity laws, and conducting oversight.
Largest vendor: R K Construction, 41% of payments across 7 vendors.
District sanction speed
67/100 · sanction is the district authority’s job, so this doesn’t change the MP’s rank
- Sanction speed 100%67Average days to sanction (full marks within the 45-day guideline, none at a year), and the share of works not overdue.
Activity over time
Recommendations, payments and completions by month
Sectors
Value of works by category
Who got paid
Top vendors by payments received
Implementing district authorities
The districts that sanction and execute this MP’s works
Works
171 works · the 60 most recent are listed here, all of them in the explorer · tap “Photos” to see geo-tagged photos from eSAKSHI
15 METRE 150 WATT X 8 NOS HIGH MAST LIGHT
Electricity & lightingLighting of public spaces· Purnia· #287034
₹8.2 L Physical Inspection · 3 Aug 2026Rec. 2 Jul 2026Paid ₹8.2 L15 METRE 150 WATT X 8 NOS HIGH MAST LIGHT
Electricity & lightingLighting of public spaces· Purnia· #287035
₹8.2 L Physical Inspection · 3 Aug 2026Rec. 2 Jul 2026Paid ₹8.2 L15 METRE 150 WATT X 8 NOS HIGH MAST LIGHT
Electricity & lightingLighting of public spaces· Purnia· #287036
₹8.2 L Physical Inspection · 3 Aug 2026Rec. 2 Jul 2026Paid ₹8.2 L15 METRE 150 WATT X 8 NOS HIGH MAST LIGHT
Electricity & lightingLighting of public spaces· Purnia· #287037
₹8.2 L Physical Inspection · 3 Aug 2026Rec. 2 Jul 2026Paid ₹8.2 L15 METRE 150 WATT X 8 NOS HIGH MAST LIGHT
Electricity & lightingLighting of public spaces· Purnia· #287038
₹8.2 L Physical Inspection · 3 Aug 2026Rec. 2 Jul 2026Paid ₹8.2 L15 METER 150 WATT X 8 NOS HIGH MAST LIGHT
Electricity & lightingLighting of public spaces· Purnia· #296821
₹8.2 L Awaiting sanction · 103 daysRec. 21 Jul 202615 METER 150 WATT X 8 NOS HIGH MAST LIGHT
Electricity & lightingLighting of public spaces· Purnia· #296822
₹8.2 L Awaiting sanction · 103 daysRec. 21 Jul 202615 METER 150 WATT X 8 NOS HIGH MAST LIGHT
Electricity & lightingLighting of public spaces· Purnia· #296824
₹8.2 L Awaiting sanction · 103 daysRec. 21 Jul 202615 METER 150 WATT X 8 NOS HIGH MAST LIGHT
Electricity & lightingLighting of public spaces· Purnia· #296839
₹8.2 L Awaiting sanction · 103 daysRec. 21 Jul 2026KODHA PRAKHAND ANTARGAT MADARSA ASHARFIYA ISLAMIYA NO-609/407 SONAPUR DIGHRI ME 25 ADAD BENCH DESK APURTI KIYA JAYE
Education & librariesPurchase of furniture and fixtures for educational purposes· Katihar· #285717
₹2.2 L Awaiting sanction · 122 daysRec. 2 Jul 202625 ADAD BENCH DESK AAPURTI KIYA JAYE
Education & librariesPurchase of furniture and fixtures for educational purposes· Katihar· #285789
₹2.2 L Awaiting sanction · 122 daysRec. 2 Jul 202625 ADAD BENCH DESK
Education & librariesPurchase of furniture and fixtures for educational purposes· Katihar· #285875
₹2.2 L Awaiting sanction · 122 daysRec. 2 Jul 202625 ADAD BENCH DESK KI APURTI KI JAYE
Education & librariesPurchase of furniture and fixtures for educational purposes· Katihar· #285876
₹2.2 L Awaiting sanction · 122 daysRec. 2 Jul 202625 ADAD BENCH DESK KI APURTI KI JAYE
Education & librariesPurchase of furniture and fixtures for educational purposes· Katihar· #285879
₹2.2 L Awaiting sanction · 122 daysRec. 2 Jul 202625 ADAD BENCH DESK KI APURTI KI JAYE
Education & librariesPurchase of furniture and fixtures for educational purposes· Katihar· #285881
₹2.2 L Awaiting sanction · 122 daysRec. 2 Jul 2026
18th Lok Sabha MPs from Bihar
Ranked by MP score
| # | MP | Utilisation | Spent | Completed | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Raj Bhushan Choudhary · Muzaffarpur | 97% | 81% | 80 | 81 |
| 2 | Giridhari Yadav · Banka | 98% | 79% | 94 | 81 |
| 3 | Rajesh Verma · Khagaria | 56% | 52% | 67 | 79 |
| 4 | Jitan Ram Manjhi · Gaya | 77% | 46% | 194 | 78 |
| 5 | Arun Bharti · Jamui | 92% | 74% | 270 | 77 |
| 6 | Kaushalendra Kumar · Nalanda | 57% | 37% | 118 | 76 |
| 7 | Smt Veena Devi · Vaishali | 100% | 89% | 30 | 76 |
| 8 | Radha Mohan Singh · Purvi Champaran | 89% | 47% | 68 | 74 |
| 9 | Vijaylakshmi Devi · Siwan | 97% | 95% | 95 | 74 |
| 10 | Ravi Shankar Prasad · Patna Sahib | 48% | 40% | 60 | 72 |
| 11 | Dr Mohammad Jawed · Kishanganj | 89% | 65% | 130 | 72 |
| 12 | Ajay Kumar Mandal · Bhagalpur | 58% | 54% | 59 | 71 |
Source: MoSPI eSAKSHI (eSAKSHI API (mplads.mospi.gov.in)). Fund utilisation = works recommended ÷ allocated limit (MoSPI’s definition); spent = vendor payments ÷ allocated limit; completion = completed ÷ recommended works. The MP score weighs completion, spending efficiency, utilisation, proof of work, spending and vendor diversity. How it’s calculated.