Nishikant Dubey

1. Recommended by the MP2 works

   ₹42.9 L · 2.9% of the ₹14.70 Cr allocated

2. Sanctioned by the district1 works

   50% sanctioned · took 9.1 months on average (due within 45 days)

3. Completed0 works

   ₹0 final cost

1 works are still awaiting sanction, 1 of them for more than 45 days.

• Recommended 2 works worth ₹42.9 L, a fund utilisation of 2.9%, higher than 1.1% of 18th Lok Sabha MPs.
• The district has sanctioned 1 of them, taking 9.1 months on average.
• ₹41.0 L has been paid to vendors, 2.8% of the allocation.
• 0 works are complete.
• The largest share of funds went to Education & libraries.
• Payments went to 1 vendors. The largest received 100%.
• No citizen ratings have been reported for completed works.

1. Works completed 30%0Completed ÷ recommended works.
2. Spending efficiency 20%0Value of completed works ÷ money paid out. Money paid without works finished scores low.
3. Fund utilisation 15%3Value of works recommended ÷ allocated limit (MoSPI’s measure).
4. Proof of work 15%Not enough dataShare of completed works with photos or documents uploaded on eSAKSHI.
5. Funds spent 10%3Paid to vendors ÷ allocated limit.
6. Vendor diversity 10%
   i

   Members of Parliament (MPs) do not have direct, operational control over the specific vendors selected for government public works. However, they exert significant indirect influence by shaping procurement frameworks, passing supplier diversity laws, and conducting oversight.

   Not enough dataHow spread out payments are: full marks when no vendor gets over 20% of the money, none when one vendor gets everything.

Largest vendor: PRAKHAND SHIKSHA PRASAR PADADHIKARI, 100% of payments across 1 vendors.

1. Sanction speed 100%Not enough dataAverage days to sanction (full marks within the 45-day guideline, none at a year), and the share of works not overdue.

1. Education & libraries2₹42.9 L

1. PRAKHAND SHIKSHA PRASAR PADADHIKARI2 payments₹41.0 L · 100%