Allocated limit
₹14.70 Cr
Median ₹14.70 Cr
Fund utilisation
99%
₹14.55 Cr recommended · 115 works
Above median (76%)
Paid to vendors
₹8.84 Cr
60% of allocation
Above median (37%)
Works completed
1
0.9% of recommended
Below median (28%)
From recommendation to completion
Every work this MP recommended, by stage
- Recommended by the MP115 works
₹14.55 Cr · 99% of the ₹14.70 Cr allocated
- Sanctioned by the district95 works
83% sanctioned · took 2.8 months on average (due within 45 days)
- Completed1 works
₹11.3 L final cost · 5.6 months from recommendation on average
20 works are still awaiting sanction, 16 of them for more than 45 days.
In plain words
What the numbers say
- Recommended 115 works worth ₹14.55 Cr, a fund utilisation of 99%, higher than 92% of 18th Lok Sabha MPs.
- The district has sanctioned 95 of them, taking 2.8 months on average.
- ₹8.84 Cr has been paid to vendors, 60% of the allocation.
- 1 works are complete, typically 5.6 months after recommendation. 1 works have geo-tagged photos on eSAKSHI.
- The largest share of funds went to Electricity & lighting.
- Payments went to 38 vendors. The largest received 26%.
- No citizen ratings have been reported for completed works.
How the score is made
MP score 34/100: finishing works counts most
- Works completed 30%1Completed ÷ recommended works.
- Spending efficiency 20%1Value of completed works ÷ money paid out. Money paid without works finished scores low.
- Fund utilisation 15%99Value of works recommended ÷ allocated limit (MoSPI’s measure).
- Proof of work 15%20Share of completed works with photos or documents uploaded on eSAKSHI.
- Funds spent 10%60Paid to vendors ÷ allocated limit.
- Vendor diversity 10%92How spread out payments are: full marks when no vendor gets over 20% of the money, none when one vendor gets everything.
i
Members of Parliament (MPs) do not have direct, operational control over the specific vendors selected for government public works. However, they exert significant indirect influence by shaping procurement frameworks, passing supplier diversity laws, and conducting oversight.
Largest vendor: MP STATE AGRO INDUSTRIES DEVELOPMENT CORP REWA, 26% of payments across 38 vendors.
District sanction speed
87/100 · sanction is the district authority’s job, so this doesn’t change the MP’s rank
- Sanction speed 100%87Average days to sanction (full marks within the 45-day guideline, none at a year), and the share of works not overdue.
Activity over time
Recommendations, payments and completions by month
Sectors
Value of works by category
Who got paid
Top vendors by payments received
Implementing district authorities
The districts that sanction and execute this MP’s works
Works
115 works · the 60 most recent are listed here, all of them in the explorer · tap “Photos” to see geo-tagged photos from eSAKSHI
Construction of PCC Road
Roads & bridgesConstruction of roads, link roads, pathways or any other road with or without drainage system· Rewa· #286632
₹5.0 L Vendor Identification · 28 Oct 2026Rec. 18 Jun 2026Paid ₹3.8 LCoverd Naali nirmand
Sanitation & drainageProviding drains and gutters for public drainage· Rewa· #324571
₹20.0 L Awaiting sanction · 5 daysRec. 27 Oct 2026Public toilet
Community buildings & public spacesConstruction of community centers and community halls· Rewa· #324572
₹4.0 L Awaiting sanction · 5 daysRec. 27 Oct 2026Grewal Road
Roads & bridgesConstruction of roads, link roads, pathways or any other road with or without drainage system· Rewa· #324573
₹5.0 L Awaiting sanction · 5 daysRec. 27 Oct 2026Grewal Road
Roads & bridgesConstruction of roads, link roads, pathways or any other road with or without drainage system· Rewa· #324574
₹5.0 L Awaiting sanction · 5 daysRec. 27 Oct 2026Construction of community halls
Community buildings & public spacesConstruction of community centers and community halls· Mauganj· #298302
₹3.0 L Vendor Identification · 24 Oct 2026Rec. 23 Jul 2026Paid ₹2.5 LPCC Road Nirman
Roads & bridgesConstruction of roads, link roads, pathways or any other road with or without drainage system· Rewa· #298307
₹8.7 L Vendor Identification · 28 Sept 2026Rec. 23 Jul 2026Paid ₹8.7 LElectricity Word
Electricity & lightingImprovement of electricity distribution infrastructure· Rewa· #255933
₹4.9 L Sanctioned · 17 Sept 2026Rec. 29 Dec 2025Electricity Work
Electricity & lightingImprovement of electricity distribution infrastructure· Rewa· #255947
₹7.9 L Sanctioned · 17 Sept 2026Rec. 29 Dec 2025Transformer and Poll Cable
Electricity & lightingLighting of public spaces· Rewa· #289034
₹9.1 L Sanctioned · 17 Sept 2026Rec. 25 Jun 2026Poll and Cable
Electricity & lightingLighting of public spaces· Rewa· #289037
₹91,935 Sanctioned · 17 Sept 2026Rec. 25 Jun 2026NA
Electricity & lightingLighting of public spaces· Rewa· #291959
₹53,438 Sanctioned · 17 Sept 2026Rec. 4 Jul 2026Open Gym
Sports & fitnessInstallation of fixed garden gym equipment· Mauganj· #302818
₹50.0 L Sanctioned · 17 Sept 2026Rec. 11 Aug 2026High Mast 180 Watt with 16 Meter GI poll
Electricity & lightingLighting of public spaces· Mauganj· #302970
₹36.1 L Sanctioned · 17 Sept 2026Rec. 11 Aug 2026Open Gym
Sports & fitnessInstallation of multi-gym equipment· Rewa· #302957
₹75.0 L Sanctioned · 16 Sept 2026Rec. 11 Aug 2026
18th Lok Sabha MPs from Madhya Pradesh
Ranked by MP score
| # | MP | Utilisation | Spent | Completed | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Durga Das Uikey · Betul | 99% | 57% | 288 | 75 |
| 2 | Gyaneshwar Patil · Khandwa | 87% | 58% | 233 | 73 |
| 3 | Dr. Lata Wankhede · Sagar | 97% | 75% | 113 | 73 |
| 4 | Jyotiraditya M. Scindia · Guna | 62% | 38% | 46 | 73 |
| 5 | Shri Anil Firojiya · Ujjain | 68% | 56% | 160 | 71 |
| 6 | Bharti Pardhi · Balaghat | 82% | 61% | 115 | 71 |
| 7 | Savitri Thakur · Dhar | 95% | 64% | 179 | 68 |
| 8 | Rahul Singh Lodhi · Damoh | 54% | 45% | 188 | 67 |
| 9 | Shankar Lalwani · Indore | 94% | 55% | 145 | 67 |
| 10 | Dr. Rajesh Mishra · Sidhi | 92% | 72% | 172 | 59 |
| 11 | Alok Sharma · Bhopal | 85% | 49% | 24 | 55 |
| 12 | Rodmal Nagar · Rajgarh | 100% | 65% | 54 | 54 |
Source: MoSPI eSAKSHI (eSAKSHI API (mplads.mospi.gov.in)). Fund utilisation = works recommended ÷ allocated limit (MoSPI’s definition); spent = vendor payments ÷ allocated limit; completion = completed ÷ recommended works. The MP score weighs completion, spending efficiency, utilisation, proof of work, spending and vendor diversity. How it’s calculated.