24th of 29 from Madhya Pradesh
Allocated limit
₹7.36 Cr
Median ₹8.60 Cr
Fund utilisation
100%
₹7.35 Cr recommended · 283 works
About the median
Paid to vendors
₹6.46 Cr
88% of allocation
About the median
Works completed
37
13% of recommended
Below median (83%)
From recommendation to completion
Every work this MP recommended, by stage
- Recommended by the MP283 works
₹7.35 Cr · 100% of the ₹7.36 Cr allocated
- Sanctioned by the district272 works
96% sanctioned · took 3.5 months on average (due within 45 days)
- Completed37 works
₹1.95 Cr final cost · 9.0 months from recommendation on average
11 works are still awaiting sanction, 11 of them for more than 45 days.
In plain words
What the numbers say
- Recommended 283 works worth ₹7.35 Cr, a fund utilisation of 100%, higher than 78% of 17th Lok Sabha MPs.
- The district has sanctioned 272 of them, taking 3.5 months on average.
- ₹6.46 Cr has been paid to vendors, 88% of the allocation.
- 37 works are complete, typically 9.0 months after recommendation. 37 works have geo-tagged photos on eSAKSHI.
- The largest share of funds went to Electricity & lighting.
- Payments went to 62 vendors. The largest received 22%.
- No citizen ratings have been reported for completed works.
How the score is made
MP score 59/100: finishing works counts most
- Works completed 30%13Completed ÷ recommended works.
- Spending efficiency 20%30Value of completed works ÷ money paid out. Money paid without works finished scores low.
- Fund utilisation 15%100Value of works recommended ÷ allocated limit (MoSPI’s measure).
- Proof of work 15%100Share of completed works with photos or documents uploaded on eSAKSHI.
- Funds spent 10%88Paid to vendors ÷ allocated limit.
- Vendor diversity 10%98How spread out payments are: full marks when no vendor gets over 20% of the money, none when one vendor gets everything.
i
Members of Parliament (MPs) do not have direct, operational control over the specific vendors selected for government public works. However, they exert significant indirect influence by shaping procurement frameworks, passing supplier diversity laws, and conducting oversight.
Largest vendor: ABHISHEK PATEL, 22% of payments across 62 vendors.
District sanction speed
88/100 · sanction is the district authority’s job, so this doesn’t change the MP’s rank
- Sanction speed 100%88Average days to sanction (full marks within the 45-day guideline, none at a year), and the share of works not overdue.
Activity over time
Recommendations, payments and completions by month
Sectors
Value of works by category
Who got paid
Top vendors by payments received
Implementing district authorities
The districts that sanction and execute this MP’s works
Works
283 works · the 60 most recent are listed here, all of them in the explorer · tap “Photos” to see geo-tagged photos from eSAKSHI
Electric poles and cables will be installed near Smt Pooja Chaudhary's pump.
Electricity & lightingImprovement of electricity distribution infrastructure· Satna· #91214
₹46,000 Sanctioned · 10 Apr 2026Rec. 29 Jan 2024Shri Puranlal Vishwkarma ke pump ke pas Ati. transfarmar evm viddutikaran
Electricity & lightingImprovement of electricity distribution infrastructure· Satna· #130187
₹2.6 L Vendor Identification · 10 Apr 2026Rec. 15 Mar 2024Paid ₹2.2 LAti. transfarmar evm viddutikaran
Electricity & lightingImprovement of electricity distribution infrastructure· Satna· #130188
₹2.1 L Sanctioned · 10 Apr 2026Rec. 15 Mar 2024Govt. Midil School ke pas viddutikaran
Electricity & lightingImprovement of electricity distribution infrastructure· Satna· #130189
₹65,000 Sanctioned · 10 Apr 2026Rec. 15 Mar 2024Shri Abhay Singh ke pump ke pas Ati. transfarmar evm viddutikaran
Electricity & lightingImprovement of electricity distribution infrastructure· Satna· #130190
₹98,000 Sanctioned · 10 Apr 2026Rec. 15 Mar 2024Barapathar me line Septing
Electricity & lightingImprovement of electricity distribution infrastructure· Satna· #131547
₹16,000 Sanctioned · 10 Apr 2026Rec. 16 Mar 2024PCC Road Nirman
Community buildings & public spacesConstruction of public staircase/ stair ghat for public convenience· Satna· #78636
₹5.0 L Completed 7 Apr 2026Rec. 9 Jan 2024Paid ₹5.0 LDurga mandir ke pas shed nirman
Community buildings & public spacesConstruction of common work sheds / common covered sitting area· Satna· #100819
₹5.0 L Vendor Identification · 18 Mar 2026Rec. 8 Feb 2024Paid ₹4.8 LGangadeen patel ke pump ke pas Ati. transfarmar & viddutikaran
Electricity & lightingImprovement of electricity distribution infrastructure· Maihar· #95520
₹2.5 L Vendor Identification · 2 Mar 2026Rec. 3 Feb 2024Paid ₹2.4 LGirja Prasad Dwivedi ke ghar ke pas viddutikaran
Electricity & lightingImprovement of electricity distribution infrastructure· Maihar· #100260
₹1.8 L Sanctioned · 2 Mar 2026Rec. 8 Feb 2024Shankar singh ke pump ke pas Ati. transfarmar & viddutikaran
Electricity & lightingImprovement of electricity distribution infrastructure· Maihar· #100262
₹2.4 L Vendor Identification · 2 Mar 2026Rec. 8 Feb 2024Paid ₹2.3 LBabulal singh ke pump ke pas Ati. transfarmar & viddutikaran
Electricity & lightingImprovement of electricity distribution infrastructure· Maihar· #100263
₹2.3 L Vendor Identification · 2 Mar 2026Rec. 8 Feb 2024Paid ₹2.2 LVishnudev Dwivedi ke pump ke pas viddutikaran
Electricity & lightingImprovement of electricity distribution infrastructure· Maihar· #100264
₹60,000 Vendor Identification · 2 Mar 2026Rec. 8 Feb 2024Paid ₹57,858Reena singh ke pump ke pas viddutikaran
Electricity & lightingImprovement of electricity distribution infrastructure· Maihar· #100265
₹1.4 L Vendor Identification · 2 Mar 2026Rec. 8 Feb 2024Paid ₹1.4 LShatrughan Prasad Patel ke pump ke pas Ati. transfarmar & viddutikaran
Electricity & lightingImprovement of electricity distribution infrastructure· Maihar· #100266
₹1.6 L Vendor Identification · 2 Mar 2026Rec. 8 Feb 2024Paid ₹1.6 L
17th Lok Sabha MPs from Madhya Pradesh
Ranked by MP score
| # | MP | Utilisation | Spent | Completed | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Shankar Lalwani · Indore | 97% | 97% | 201 | 96 |
| 2 | Smt Riti Pathak · Sidhi | 100% | 100% | 30 | 94 |
| 3 | Chhatar Singh Darbar · Dhar | 97% | 97% | 398 | 94 |
| 4 | Dhal Singh Bisen · Balaghat | 100% | 100% | 303 | 90 |
| 5 | Vishnu Dutt Sharma · Khajuraho | 100% | 91% | 106 | 88 |
| 6 | Smt Himadri Singh · Shahdol | 100% | 99% | 315 | 88 |
| 7 | Shri Anil Firojiya · Ujjain | 97% | 95% | 218 | 88 |
| 8 | Rajbahadur Singh · Sagar | 100% | 96% | 154 | 85 |
| 9 | Gyaneshwar Patil · Khandwa | 99% | 94% | 140 | 84 |
| 10 | Smt Sandhya Ray · Bhind | 99% | 95% | 163 | 84 |
| 11 | Nakul K Nath · Chhindwara | 99% | 85% | 504 | 83 |
| 12 | Prahlad Singh Patel · Damoh | 99% | 86% | 152 | 83 |
Source: MoSPI eSAKSHI (eSAKSHI API (mplads.mospi.gov.in)). Fund utilisation = works recommended ÷ allocated limit (MoSPI’s definition); spent = vendor payments ÷ allocated limit; completion = completed ÷ recommended works. The MP score weighs completion, spending efficiency, utilisation, proof of work, spending and vendor diversity. How it’s calculated.