Skip to content
MPLADSTracker

MPLADS report card · Rajya Sabha

Shri Bhashyam Rama Krishna

Rajya SabhaTDPTerm 2026–2032Andhra Pradesh

MP score4/100196th of 235 in the Rajya Sabha
11th of 12 from Andhra Pradesh
  • Most funds not yet used

    Works recommended for only 16% of the allocated limit.

Allocated limit

₹4.90 Cr

Median ₹14.70 Cr

Fund utilisation

16%

₹80.0 L recommended · 2 works
Below median (70%)

Paid to vendors

₹0

0% of allocation
Below median (25%)

Works completed

0

0% of recommended
Below median (26%)

From recommendation to completion

Every work this MP recommended, by stage

  1. Recommended by the MP2 works

    ₹80.0 L · 16% of the ₹4.90 Cr allocated

  2. Sanctioned by the district1 works

    50% sanctioned · took 23 days on average (due within 45 days)

  3. Completed0 works

    ₹0 final cost

1 works are still awaiting sanction.

In plain words

What the numbers say

  • Recommended 2 works worth ₹80.0 L, a fund utilisation of 16%, higher than 18% of Rajya Sabha MPs.
  • The district has sanctioned 1 of them, taking 23 days on average.
  • ₹0 has been paid to vendors, 0% of the allocation.
  • 0 works are complete.
  • The largest share of funds went to Education & libraries.
  • No citizen ratings have been reported for completed works.

How the score is made

MP score 4/100: finishing works counts most

  1. Works completed 30%0Completed ÷ recommended works.
  2. Spending efficiency 20%Not enough dataValue of completed works ÷ money paid out. Money paid without works finished scores low.
  3. Fund utilisation 15%16Value of works recommended ÷ allocated limit (MoSPI’s measure).
  4. Proof of work 15%Not enough dataShare of completed works with photos or documents uploaded on eSAKSHI.
  5. Funds spent 10%0Paid to vendors ÷ allocated limit.
  6. Vendor diversity 10%
    i

    Members of Parliament (MPs) do not have direct, operational control over the specific vendors selected for government public works. However, they exert significant indirect influence by shaping procurement frameworks, passing supplier diversity laws, and conducting oversight.

    Not enough data
    How spread out payments are: full marks when no vendor gets over 20% of the money, none when one vendor gets everything.

District sanction speed

Not enough data yet · sanction is the district authority’s job, so this doesn’t change the MP’s rank

  1. Sanction speed 100%Not enough dataAverage days to sanction (full marks within the 45-day guideline, none at a year), and the share of works not overdue.

Activity over time

Recommendations, payments and completions by month

Value of works MPs recommended each month

Who got paid

Top vendors by payments received

No vendor payments recorded yet.

Implementing district authorities

The districts that sanction and execute this MP’s works

Works

2 works · tap “Photos” to see geo-tagged photos from eSAKSHI

Open in explorer
  • Construction of Additional Class Rooms and providing other infrastructure developments at MPPS (HE), Chinakakani (V), Mangalagiri (Mandal), Guntur District

    Education & librariesConstruction of rooms and halls in school and colleges· Guntur· #321677

    ₹50.0 L Awaiting sanction · 20 daysRec. 12 Oct 2026
  • Providing additional accommodation to Community Hall Building in Annavaram Village of Rompicharla Mandal

    Community buildings & public spacesConstruction of community centers and community halls· Palnadu· #308726

    ₹30.0 L Sanctioned · 19 Sept 2026Rec. 27 Aug 2026

Rajya Sabha MPs from Andhra Pradesh

Ranked by MP score

Compare

Source: MoSPI eSAKSHI (eSAKSHI API (mplads.mospi.gov.in)). Fund utilisation = works recommended ÷ allocated limit (MoSPI’s definition); spent = vendor payments ÷ allocated limit; completion = completed ÷ recommended works. The MP score weighs completion, spending efficiency, utilisation, proof of work, spending and vendor diversity. How it’s calculated.