11th of 20 from Kerala
Works waiting for sanction
79 recommended works are still awaiting sanction more than 45 days later. Sanction is the district authority’s responsibility.
Allocated limit
₹16.47 Cr
Median ₹14.70 Cr
Fund utilisation
80%
₹13.13 Cr recommended · 170 works
Above median (76%)
Paid to vendors
₹3.30 Cr
20% of allocation
Below median (37%)
Works completed
36
21% of recommended
Below median (28%)
From recommendation to completion
Every work this MP recommended, by stage
- Recommended by the MP170 works
₹13.13 Cr · 80% of the ₹16.47 Cr allocated
- Sanctioned by the district90 works
53% sanctioned · took 10.8 months on average (due within 45 days)
- Completed36 works
₹2.08 Cr final cost · 17.2 months from recommendation on average
80 works are still awaiting sanction, 79 of them for more than 45 days.
In plain words
What the numbers say
- Recommended 170 works worth ₹13.13 Cr, a fund utilisation of 80%, higher than 55% of 18th Lok Sabha MPs.
- The district has sanctioned 90 of them, taking 10.8 months on average.
- ₹3.30 Cr has been paid to vendors, 20% of the allocation.
- 36 works are complete, typically 17.2 months after recommendation. 35 works have geo-tagged photos on eSAKSHI.
- The largest share of funds went to Education & libraries.
- Payments went to 23 vendors. The largest received 15%.
- No citizen ratings have been reported for completed works.
How the score is made
MP score 58/100: finishing works counts most
- Works completed 30%21Completed ÷ recommended works.
- Spending efficiency 20%63Value of completed works ÷ money paid out. Money paid without works finished scores low.
- Fund utilisation 15%80Value of works recommended ÷ allocated limit (MoSPI’s measure).
- Proof of work 15%97Share of completed works with photos or documents uploaded on eSAKSHI.
- Funds spent 10%20Paid to vendors ÷ allocated limit.
- Vendor diversity 10%100How spread out payments are: full marks when no vendor gets over 20% of the money, none when one vendor gets everything.
i
Members of Parliament (MPs) do not have direct, operational control over the specific vendors selected for government public works. However, they exert significant indirect influence by shaping procurement frameworks, passing supplier diversity laws, and conducting oversight.
Largest vendor: TATA MOTORS, 15% of payments across 23 vendors.
District sanction speed
33/100 · sanction is the district authority’s job, so this doesn’t change the MP’s rank
- Sanction speed 100%33Average days to sanction (full marks within the 45-day guideline, none at a year), and the share of works not overdue.
Activity over time
Recommendations, payments and completions by month
Sectors
Value of works by category
Who got paid
Top vendors by payments received
Implementing district authorities
The districts that sanction and execute this MP’s works
Works
170 works · the 60 most recent are listed here, all of them in the explorer · tap “Photos” to see geo-tagged photos from eSAKSHI
MINIMAST LED LIGHT IN FRONT OF AZHAKAM DURGADEVI TEMPLE
Electricity & lightingStreet lights· Thrissur· #168973
₹1.9 L Completed 31 Oct 2026Rec. 25 Jan 2025Paid ₹1.9 LTILE PAVING OF ATHANI MASJID ROAD-HARIJAN UNNATHI ROAD(RENOVATION) IN WARD 6 OF ERIYAD GP
Roads & bridgesConstruction of roads, link roads, pathways or any other road with or without drainage system· Thrissur· #294321
₹20.5 L Sanctioned · 30 Oct 2026Rec. 11 Jul 2026LAYING OF INTERLOCK PAVER BLOCKS IN THOTTUVA HEALTH SUBCENTRE PAKALVEED ROAD IN OKKAL GP
Roads & bridgesConstruction of roads, link roads, pathways or any other road with or without drainage system· Ernakulam· #211409
₹3.5 L Completed 29 Oct 2026Rec. 23 Jun 2025Paid ₹3.5 LLAYING OF INTERLOCK PAVER BLOCKS IN GURUDARSHANA ROAD IN OKKAL GP
Roads & bridgesConstruction of roads, link roads, pathways or any other road with or without drainage system· Ernakulam· #211411
₹4.6 L Completed 29 Oct 2026Rec. 23 Jun 2025Paid ₹4.6 LRENOVATION OF HOMEO HOSPITAL ROAD TILE PAVING IN OKKAL GP
Roads & bridgesConstruction of roads, link roads, pathways or any other road with or without drainage system· Ernakulam· #211420
₹1.1 L Completed 29 Oct 2026Rec. 23 Jun 2025Paid ₹1.1 LCONSTRUCTION OF MANGALAPPILLY ROAD IN WARD 5 IN PUTHENCHIRA GP
Roads & bridgesConstruction of roads, link roads, pathways or any other road with or without drainage system· Thrissur· #212202
₹9.1 L Completed 15 Oct 2026Rec. 25 Jun 2025Paid ₹9.1 LCONSTRUCTION OF ANGANWADY BUILDING(COMPLETION WORK) IN WARD 10 VAZHAKKULAM GP
Education & librariesConstruction of buildings for crèches and anganwadies· Ernakulam· #177953
₹9.7 L Completed 9 Oct 2026Rec. 27 Feb 2025Paid ₹9.7 LMINIMAST LIGHT AT PANDIYAM JN, VAZHAKULAM
Electricity & lightingStreet lights· Ernakulam· #162733
₹2.1 L Completed 5 Oct 2026Rec. 31 Dec 2024Paid ₹2.1 LMINIMAST LIGHT NEAR KAIPOORIKKARA MUSLIM JAMA ATH
Electricity & lightingStreet lights· Ernakulam· #162712
₹2.1 L Completed 1 Oct 2026Rec. 31 Dec 2024Paid ₹2.1 LMINIMAST LIGHT IN BH NAGAR JUNCTION, IN RAJAJI ROAD
Electricity & lightingStreet lights· Ernakulam· #162725
₹2.1 L Completed 1 Oct 2026Rec. 31 Dec 2024Paid ₹2.1 LMINIMAST LIGHT IN BLOCK JN, VAZHAKULAM
Electricity & lightingStreet lights· Ernakulam· #162727
₹2.1 L Completed 1 Oct 2026Rec. 31 Dec 2024Paid ₹2.1 LMINIMAST LIGHT AT ST ANDREWS CHURCH SURROUNDINGS PERIYARMUGHAM
Electricity & lightingStreet lights· Ernakulam· #165411
₹2.2 L Completed 1 Oct 2026Rec. 14 Jan 2025Paid ₹2.2 LMINIMAST LIGHT AT KAINADANMALA JUNCTION
Electricity & lightingStreet lights· Ernakulam· #165417
₹2.1 L Completed 1 Oct 2026Rec. 14 Jan 2025Paid ₹2.1 LSIDE PROTECTION AND SECOND REACH CONCRETING OF LAPLIMOOPAN COLONY ROAD IN WARD 7 OF KODASSERY GP(SC WORK)
Roads & bridgesConstruction of roads, link roads, pathways or any other road with or without drainage system· Thrissur· #317892
₹8.7 L Awaiting sanction · 38 daysRec. 24 Sep 2026MINIMAST LED LIGHT AT PALUPPUZHA MATTATHIKKADAVU ROAD WARD12 IN ANNAMANADA GP
Electricity & lightingLighting of public spaces· Thrissur· #165383
₹2.3 L Sanctioned · 23 Sept 2026Rec. 14 Jan 2025
18th Lok Sabha MPs from Kerala
Ranked by MP score
| # | MP | Utilisation | Spent | Completed | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Adv Dean Kuriakose · Idukki | 95% | 42% | 102 | 73 |
| 2 | Vellalath Kochukrishnan Nair Sreekandan · Palakkad | 92% | 32% | 123 | 71 |
| 3 | Dr Shashi Tharoor · Thiruvananthapuram | 68% | 30% | 54 | 67 |
| 4 | Adv K Francis George · Kottayam | 98% | 23% | 89 | 65 |
| 5 | K Radhakrishnan · Alathur | 98% | 21% | 30 | 62 |
| 6 | Shri NK Premachandran · Kollam | 77% | 42% | 78 | 62 |
| 7 | Shri Hibi Eden · Ernakulam | 92% | 19% | 29 | 61 |
| 8 | Shri Kumbakudi Sudhakaran · Kannur | 80% | 19% | 81 | 61 |
| 9 | Shri Suresh Kodikunnil · Mavelikkara | 78% | 26% | 70 | 60 |
| 10 | K. C Venugopal · Alappuzha | 64% | 37% | 45 | 58 |
| 11 | Shri Benny Behanan · Chalakudy | 80% | 20% | 36 | 58 |
| 12 | Dr. M.P Abdussamad Samadani · Ponnani | 97% | 16% | 62 | 57 |
Source: MoSPI eSAKSHI (eSAKSHI API (mplads.mospi.gov.in)). Fund utilisation = works recommended ÷ allocated limit (MoSPI’s definition); spent = vendor payments ÷ allocated limit; completion = completed ÷ recommended works. The MP score weighs completion, spending efficiency, utilisation, proof of work, spending and vendor diversity. How it’s calculated.