27th of 29 from Madhya Pradesh
Allocated limit
₹14.70 Cr
Median ₹14.70 Cr
Fund utilisation
65%
₹9.59 Cr recommended · 397 works
Below median (76%)
Paid to vendors
₹2.51 Cr
17% of allocation
Below median (37%)
Works completed
15
3.8% of recommended
Below median (28%)
From recommendation to completion
Every work this MP recommended, by stage
- Recommended by the MP397 works
₹9.59 Cr · 65% of the ₹14.70 Cr allocated
- Sanctioned by the district156 works
39% sanctioned · took 6.0 months on average (due within 45 days)
- Completed15 works
₹48.3 L final cost · 11.8 months from recommendation on average
241 works are still awaiting sanction, 106 of them for more than 45 days.
In plain words
What the numbers say
- Recommended 397 works worth ₹9.59 Cr, a fund utilisation of 65%, higher than 31% of 18th Lok Sabha MPs.
- The district has sanctioned 156 of them, taking 6.0 months on average.
- ₹2.51 Cr has been paid to vendors, 17% of the allocation.
- 15 works are complete, typically 11.8 months after recommendation. 17 works have geo-tagged photos on eSAKSHI.
- The largest share of funds went to Community buildings & public spaces.
- Payments went to 28 vendors. The largest received 34%.
- No citizen ratings have been reported for completed works.
How the score is made
MP score 40/100: finishing works counts most
- Works completed 30%4Completed ÷ recommended works.
- Spending efficiency 20%19Value of completed works ÷ money paid out. Money paid without works finished scores low.
- Fund utilisation 15%65Value of works recommended ÷ allocated limit (MoSPI’s measure).
- Proof of work 15%100Share of completed works with photos or documents uploaded on eSAKSHI.
- Funds spent 10%17Paid to vendors ÷ allocated limit.
- Vendor diversity 10%82How spread out payments are: full marks when no vendor gets over 20% of the money, none when one vendor gets everything.
i
Members of Parliament (MPs) do not have direct, operational control over the specific vendors selected for government public works. However, they exert significant indirect influence by shaping procurement frameworks, passing supplier diversity laws, and conducting oversight.
Largest vendor: MP AGRO JABALPUR, 34% of payments across 28 vendors.
District sanction speed
65/100 · sanction is the district authority’s job, so this doesn’t change the MP’s rank
- Sanction speed 100%65Average days to sanction (full marks within the 45-day guideline, none at a year), and the share of works not overdue.
Activity over time
Recommendations, payments and completions by month
Sectors
Value of works by category
Who got paid
Top vendors by payments received
Implementing district authorities
The districts that sanction and execute this MP’s works
Works
399 works · the 60 most recent are listed here, all of them in the explorer · tap “Photos” to see geo-tagged photos from eSAKSHI
Construction of rooms in Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya.
Education & librariesConstruction of rooms and halls in school and colleges· Jabalpur· #278799
₹3.5 L Vendor Identification · 9 Oct 2026Rec. 22 Apr 2026Paid ₹2.9 LConstruction of cc road.
Roads & bridgesConstruction of roads, link roads, pathways or any other road with or without drainage system· Jabalpur· #319590
₹3.0 L Awaiting sanction · 29 daysRec. 3 Oct 2026Construction of stage for cultural activities.
Community buildings & public spacesConstruction of buildings for community cultural activities· Jabalpur· #319591
₹2.5 L Awaiting sanction · 29 daysRec. 3 Oct 2026Construction of room.
Community buildings & public spacesConstruction of additional rooms and halls in the existing public and community building· Jabalpur· #319592
₹2.5 L Awaiting sanction · 29 daysRec. 3 Oct 2026Construction of stage for cultural activities.
Community buildings & public spacesConstruction of buildings for community cultural activities· Jabalpur· #319593
₹2.5 L Awaiting sanction · 29 daysRec. 3 Oct 2026Renovation of pond.
Irrigation, flood & environmentRenovation of ponds and lakes· Jabalpur· #319594
₹2.5 L Awaiting sanction · 29 daysRec. 3 Oct 2026Construction of stage for cultural activities.
Community buildings & public spacesConstruction of buildings for community cultural activities· Jabalpur· #319595
₹2.5 L Awaiting sanction · 29 daysRec. 3 Oct 2026Construction of stage for cultural activities.
Community buildings & public spacesConstruction of buildings for community cultural activities· Jabalpur· #319596
₹3.5 L Awaiting sanction · 29 daysRec. 3 Oct 2026Construction of cc road.
Roads & bridgesConstruction of roads, link roads, pathways or any other road with or without drainage system· Jabalpur· #319597
₹2.5 L Awaiting sanction · 29 daysRec. 3 Oct 2026Construction of cc road.
Roads & bridgesConstruction of roads, link roads, pathways or any other road with or without drainage system· Jabalpur· #319598
₹2.5 L Awaiting sanction · 29 daysRec. 3 Oct 2026Construction of bus shed.
Community buildings & public spacesConstruction of bus-sheds or bus-stops· Jabalpur· #319599
₹2.5 L Awaiting sanction · 29 daysRec. 3 Oct 2026Construction of cc road.
Roads & bridgesConstruction of roads, link roads, pathways or any other road with or without drainage system· Jabalpur· #319600
₹2.5 L Awaiting sanction · 29 daysRec. 3 Oct 2026Construction of stage for cultural activities.
Community buildings & public spacesConstruction of buildings for community cultural activities· Jabalpur· #319601
₹2.5 L Awaiting sanction · 29 daysRec. 3 Oct 2026Construction of stage for cultural activities.
Community buildings & public spacesConstruction of buildings for community cultural activities· Jabalpur· #319602
₹2.5 L Awaiting sanction · 29 daysRec. 3 Oct 2026Construction of stage for cultural activities.
Community buildings & public spacesConstruction of buildings for community cultural activities· Jabalpur· #319603
₹2.5 L Awaiting sanction · 29 daysRec. 3 Oct 2026
18th Lok Sabha MPs from Madhya Pradesh
Ranked by MP score
| # | MP | Utilisation | Spent | Completed | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Durga Das Uikey · Betul | 99% | 57% | 288 | 75 |
| 2 | Gyaneshwar Patil · Khandwa | 87% | 58% | 233 | 73 |
| 3 | Dr. Lata Wankhede · Sagar | 97% | 75% | 113 | 73 |
| 4 | Jyotiraditya M. Scindia · Guna | 62% | 38% | 46 | 73 |
| 5 | Shri Anil Firojiya · Ujjain | 68% | 56% | 160 | 71 |
| 6 | Bharti Pardhi · Balaghat | 82% | 61% | 115 | 71 |
| 7 | Savitri Thakur · Dhar | 95% | 64% | 179 | 68 |
| 8 | Rahul Singh Lodhi · Damoh | 54% | 45% | 188 | 67 |
| 9 | Shankar Lalwani · Indore | 94% | 55% | 145 | 67 |
| 10 | Dr. Rajesh Mishra · Sidhi | 92% | 72% | 172 | 59 |
| 11 | Alok Sharma · Bhopal | 85% | 49% | 24 | 55 |
| 12 | Rodmal Nagar · Rajgarh | 100% | 65% | 54 | 54 |
Source: MoSPI eSAKSHI (eSAKSHI API (mplads.mospi.gov.in)). Fund utilisation = works recommended ÷ allocated limit (MoSPI’s definition); spent = vendor payments ÷ allocated limit; completion = completed ÷ recommended works. The MP score weighs completion, spending efficiency, utilisation, proof of work, spending and vendor diversity. How it’s calculated.