10th of 12 from Punjab
Allocated limit
₹14.70 Cr
Median ₹14.70 Cr
Fund utilisation
96%
₹14.04 Cr recommended · 372 works
Above median (76%)
Paid to vendors
₹6.21 Cr
42% of allocation
Above median (37%)
Works completed
96
26% of recommended
Below median (28%)
From recommendation to completion
Every work this MP recommended, by stage
- Recommended by the MP372 works
₹14.04 Cr · 96% of the ₹14.70 Cr allocated
- Sanctioned by the district338 works
91% sanctioned · took 2.1 months on average (due within 45 days)
- Completed96 works
₹2.35 Cr final cost · 12.0 months from recommendation on average
34 works are still awaiting sanction, 9 of them for more than 45 days.
In plain words
What the numbers say
- Recommended 372 works worth ₹14.04 Cr, a fund utilisation of 96%, higher than 83% of 18th Lok Sabha MPs.
- The district has sanctioned 338 of them, taking 2.1 months on average.
- ₹6.21 Cr has been paid to vendors, 42% of the allocation.
- 96 works are complete, typically 12.0 months after recommendation. 41 works have geo-tagged photos on eSAKSHI.
- The largest share of funds went to Roads & bridges.
- Payments went to 187 vendors. The largest received 6.7%.
- No citizen ratings have been reported for completed works.
How the score is made
MP score 50/100: finishing works counts most
- Works completed 30%26Completed ÷ recommended works.
- Spending efficiency 20%38Value of completed works ÷ money paid out. Money paid without works finished scores low.
- Fund utilisation 15%96Value of works recommended ÷ allocated limit (MoSPI’s measure).
- Proof of work 15%43Share of completed works with photos or documents uploaded on eSAKSHI.
- Funds spent 10%42Paid to vendors ÷ allocated limit.
- Vendor diversity 10%100How spread out payments are: full marks when no vendor gets over 20% of the money, none when one vendor gets everything.
i
Members of Parliament (MPs) do not have direct, operational control over the specific vendors selected for government public works. However, they exert significant indirect influence by shaping procurement frameworks, passing supplier diversity laws, and conducting oversight.
Largest vendor: MS SRV INTERNATIONAL, 6.7% of payments across 187 vendors.
District sanction speed
96/100 · sanction is the district authority’s job, so this doesn’t change the MP’s rank
- Sanction speed 100%96Average days to sanction (full marks within the 45-day guideline, none at a year), and the share of works not overdue.
Activity over time
Recommendations, payments and completions by month
Sectors
Value of works by category
Who got paid
Top vendors by payments received
Implementing district authorities
The districts that sanction and execute this MP’s works
Works
372 works · the 60 most recent are listed here, all of them in the explorer · tap “Photos” to see geo-tagged photos from eSAKSHI
Solar Street light. The working agency will be Gram Panchayat
Electricity & lightingStreet lights· Pathankot· #310173
₹2.5 L Sanctioned · 30 Oct 2026Rec. 1 Sep 2026Construction of Panchayat Ghar. The working agency will be Gram Panchayat
Community buildings & public spacesConstruction of community centers and community halls· Pathankot· #310174
₹5.0 L Sanctioned · 30 Oct 2026Rec. 1 Sep 2026Construction at Community hall. work for borewell etc. The working agency will be Gram Panchayat
Community buildings & public spacesConstruction of community centers and community halls· Pathankot· #310175
₹5.0 L Sanctioned · 30 Oct 2026Rec. 1 Sep 2026Deep bore. The working agency will be Gram Panchayat
Drinking waterInstalling tube-wells and borewells· Pathankot· #310966
₹5.0 L Sanctioned · 30 Oct 2026Rec. 1 Sep 2026Construction of street. The working agency will be Mandi Board
Roads & bridgesConstruction of roads, link roads, pathways or any other road with or without drainage system· Gurdaspur· #317882
₹2.5 L Sanctioned · 23 Oct 2026Rec. 26 Sep 2026Solar light. The working agency will be Mandi board
Electricity & lightingStreet lights· Gurdaspur· #320608
₹2.5 L Sanctioned · 23 Oct 2026Rec. 7 Oct 2026Solar light. The working agency will be Mandi board
Electricity & lightingStreet lights· Gurdaspur· #320609
₹2.5 L Sanctioned · 23 Oct 2026Rec. 7 Oct 2026Solar light. The working agency will be Mandi board
Electricity & lightingStreet lights· Gurdaspur· #320610
₹2.5 L Sanctioned · 23 Oct 2026Rec. 7 Oct 2026Solar light. The working agency will be Mandi Board
Electricity & lightingStreet lights· Gurdaspur· #323611
₹2.5 L Awaiting sanction · 12 daysRec. 20 Oct 2026Solar light. The working agency will be Mandi Board
Electricity & lightingStreet lights· Gurdaspur· #323612
₹2.5 L Awaiting sanction · 12 daysRec. 20 Oct 2026Solar light. The working agency will be Mandi Board
Electricity & lightingStreet lights· Gurdaspur· #323613
₹2.5 L Awaiting sanction · 12 daysRec. 20 Oct 2026Solar light. The working agency will be Mandi Board
Electricity & lightingStreet lights· Gurdaspur· #323614
₹2.5 L Awaiting sanction · 12 daysRec. 20 Oct 2026Solar light. The working agency will be Mandi Board
Electricity & lightingStreet lights· Gurdaspur· #323615
₹2.5 L Awaiting sanction · 12 daysRec. 20 Oct 2026Interlock tiles. The working agency will be Gram Panchayat
Roads & bridgesConstruction of roads, link roads, pathways or any other road with or without drainage system· Gurdaspur· #323616
₹5.0 L Awaiting sanction · 12 daysRec. 20 Oct 2026Construction of Drainage. The working agency will be Gram Panchayat
Roads & bridgesConstruction of roads, link roads, pathways or any other road with or without drainage system· Gurdaspur· #323617
₹5.0 L Awaiting sanction · 12 daysRec. 20 Oct 2026
18th Lok Sabha MPs from Punjab
Ranked by MP score
| # | MP | Utilisation | Spent | Completed | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sher Singh Ghubaya · Firozpur | 96% | 66% | 379 | 73 |
| 2 | Smt Harsimrat Kaur Badal · Bhatinda | 100% | 61% | 180 | 67 |
| 3 | Gurmeet Singh Meet Hayer · Sangrur | 79% | 43% | 158 | 63 |
| 4 | Malvinder Singh Kang · Anandpur Sahib | 95% | 61% | 125 | 61 |
| 5 | Dr. Raj Kumar Chabbewal · Hoshiarpur | 97% | 57% | 123 | 60 |
| 6 | Sarabjeet Singh Khalsa · Faridkot | 92% | 71% | 238 | 56 |
| 7 | Dr Dharamvira Gandhi · Patiala | 87% | 42% | 81 | 55 |
| 8 | Shri Amar Singh · Fatehgarh Sahib | 85% | 33% | 79 | 53 |
| 9 | Charanjit Singh Channi · Jalandhar | 48% | 20% | 58 | 50 |
| 10 | Sukhjinder Singh Randhawa · Gurdaspur | 96% | 42% | 96 | 50 |
| 11 | Amrinder Singh Raja Warring · Ludhiana | 64% | 26% | 61 | 49 |
| 12 | Shri Gurjeet Singh Aujla · Amritsar | 85% | 50% | 92 | 48 |
Source: MoSPI eSAKSHI (eSAKSHI API (mplads.mospi.gov.in)). Fund utilisation = works recommended ÷ allocated limit (MoSPI’s definition); spent = vendor payments ÷ allocated limit; completion = completed ÷ recommended works. The MP score weighs completion, spending efficiency, utilisation, proof of work, spending and vendor diversity. How it’s calculated.