6th of 12 from Punjab
Allocated limit
₹15.09 Cr
Median ₹14.70 Cr
Fund utilisation
92%
₹13.83 Cr recommended · 606 works
Above median (76%)
Paid to vendors
₹10.72 Cr
71% of allocation
Above median (37%)
Works completed
238
39% of recommended
Above median (28%)
From recommendation to completion
Every work this MP recommended, by stage
- Recommended by the MP606 works
₹13.83 Cr · 92% of the ₹15.09 Cr allocated
- Sanctioned by the district584 works
96% sanctioned · took 44 days on average (due within 45 days)
- Completed238 works
₹5.21 Cr final cost · 7.6 months from recommendation on average
22 works are still awaiting sanction, 21 of them for more than 45 days.
In plain words
What the numbers say
- Recommended 606 works worth ₹13.83 Cr, a fund utilisation of 92%, higher than 76% of 18th Lok Sabha MPs.
- The district has sanctioned 584 of them, taking 44 days on average.
- ₹10.72 Cr has been paid to vendors, 71% of the allocation.
- 238 works are complete, typically 7.6 months after recommendation. 70 works have geo-tagged photos on eSAKSHI.
- The largest share of funds went to Community buildings & public spaces.
- Payments went to 185 vendors. The largest received 23%.
- No citizen ratings have been reported for completed works.
How the score is made
MP score 56/100: finishing works counts most
- Works completed 30%39Completed ÷ recommended works.
- Spending efficiency 20%49Value of completed works ÷ money paid out. Money paid without works finished scores low.
- Fund utilisation 15%92Value of works recommended ÷ allocated limit (MoSPI’s measure).
- Proof of work 15%29Share of completed works with photos or documents uploaded on eSAKSHI.
- Funds spent 10%71Paid to vendors ÷ allocated limit.
- Vendor diversity 10%97How spread out payments are: full marks when no vendor gets over 20% of the money, none when one vendor gets everything.
i
Members of Parliament (MPs) do not have direct, operational control over the specific vendors selected for government public works. However, they exert significant indirect influence by shaping procurement frameworks, passing supplier diversity laws, and conducting oversight.
Largest vendor: GILL TRADING COMPANY, 23% of payments across 185 vendors.
District sanction speed
98/100 · sanction is the district authority’s job, so this doesn’t change the MP’s rank
- Sanction speed 100%98Average days to sanction (full marks within the 45-day guideline, none at a year), and the share of works not overdue.
Activity over time
Recommendations, payments and completions by month
Sectors
Value of works by category
Who got paid
Top vendors by payments received
Implementing district authorities
The districts that sanction and execute this MP’s works
Works
608 works · the 60 most recent are listed here, all of them in the explorer · tap “Photos” to see geo-tagged photos from eSAKSHI
Purchase of mobile water tanker with fire extinguisher
Drinking waterPurchase of mobile water tankers· Faridkot· #310940
₹3.5 L Sanctioned · 29 Oct 2026Rec. 8 Sep 2026Fitting of Sitting RCC Benches in Public Places
Community buildings & public spacesFitting of sitting RCC Benches in public places· Faridkot· #310942
₹1.5 L Sanctioned · 29 Oct 2026Rec. 8 Sep 2026Construction of Shed in Sc Dharmshala
Community buildings & public spacesConstruction of common work sheds / common covered sitting area· Faridkot· #310946
₹2.0 L Sanctioned · 29 Oct 2026Rec. 8 Sep 2026Construction of Shed near of Dera baba kala mehir ji
Community buildings & public spacesConstruction of common work sheds / common covered sitting area· Faridkot· #310949
₹2.0 L Sanctioned · 29 Oct 2026Rec. 8 Sep 2026Installation of fixed garden gym equipment
Sports & fitness· Faridkot· #310951
₹3.0 L Sanctioned · 29 Oct 2026Rec. 8 Sep 2026Construction of Shed in Govt Middle School
Community buildings & public spacesConstruction of common work sheds / common covered sitting area· Faridkot· #311925
₹3.0 L Sanctioned · 29 Oct 2026Rec. 8 Sep 2026Installation of Iron Fencing of Boundary wall of Vollyball Gorund
Sports & fitnessDevelopment of playfields and sports grounds· Faridkot· #311930
₹6.0 L Sanctioned · 29 Oct 2026Rec. 8 Sep 2026Laying of interlocking tiles at Sab singh home to Nihal singh Home
Roads & bridgesConstruction of roads, link roads, pathways or any other road with or without drainage system· Faridkot· #313465
₹2.5 L Sanctioned · 29 Oct 2026Rec. 8 Sep 2026Construction of two bus-sheds
Community buildings & public spacesConstruction of bus-sheds or bus-stops· Faridkot· #313466
₹3.0 L Sanctioned · 29 Oct 2026Rec. 8 Sep 2026Purchase of Dead body Freezer
Community buildings & public spacesCrematoriums / Energy efficient crematoriums or structures on burial / cremation ground· Faridkot· #313469
₹1.5 L Sanctioned · 29 Oct 2026Rec. 8 Sep 2026Purchase of mobile water tanker
Drinking waterPurchase of mobile water tankers· Faridkot· #313475
₹2.3 L Vendor Identification · 29 Oct 2026Rec. 8 Sep 2026Paid ₹2.3 LFitting of Sitting RCC Benches in Public Places
Community buildings & public spacesFitting of sitting RCC Benches in public places· Faridkot· #313478
₹1.5 L Sanctioned · 29 Oct 2026Rec. 8 Sep 2026Installation of RO With Water Coller in Adarsh School Midduman
Drinking waterInstalling community drinking water plants· Faridkot· #313483
₹1.0 L Sanctioned · 29 Oct 2026Rec. 8 Sep 2026Purchase of Dead Body Freezer
Community buildings & public spacesCrematoriums / Energy efficient crematoriums or structures on burial / cremation ground· Faridkot· #313484
₹1.5 L Sanctioned · 29 Oct 2026Rec. 8 Sep 2026Installation of RO System with Water Coller in Govt High School
Drinking waterInstalling community drinking water plants· Faridkot· #313485
₹2.0 L Sanctioned · 29 Oct 2026Rec. 8 Sep 2026
18th Lok Sabha MPs from Punjab
Ranked by MP score
| # | MP | Utilisation | Spent | Completed | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sher Singh Ghubaya · Firozpur | 96% | 66% | 379 | 73 |
| 2 | Smt Harsimrat Kaur Badal · Bhatinda | 100% | 61% | 180 | 67 |
| 3 | Gurmeet Singh Meet Hayer · Sangrur | 79% | 43% | 158 | 63 |
| 4 | Malvinder Singh Kang · Anandpur Sahib | 95% | 61% | 125 | 61 |
| 5 | Dr. Raj Kumar Chabbewal · Hoshiarpur | 97% | 57% | 123 | 60 |
| 6 | Sarabjeet Singh Khalsa · Faridkot | 92% | 71% | 238 | 56 |
| 7 | Dr Dharamvira Gandhi · Patiala | 87% | 42% | 81 | 55 |
| 8 | Shri Amar Singh · Fatehgarh Sahib | 85% | 33% | 79 | 53 |
| 9 | Charanjit Singh Channi · Jalandhar | 48% | 20% | 58 | 50 |
| 10 | Sukhjinder Singh Randhawa · Gurdaspur | 96% | 42% | 96 | 50 |
| 11 | Amrinder Singh Raja Warring · Ludhiana | 64% | 26% | 61 | 49 |
| 12 | Shri Gurjeet Singh Aujla · Amritsar | 85% | 50% | 92 | 48 |
Source: MoSPI eSAKSHI (eSAKSHI API (mplads.mospi.gov.in)). Fund utilisation = works recommended ÷ allocated limit (MoSPI’s definition); spent = vendor payments ÷ allocated limit; completion = completed ÷ recommended works. The MP score weighs completion, spending efficiency, utilisation, proof of work, spending and vendor diversity. How it’s calculated.