12th of 12 from Punjab
Allocated limit
₹14.70 Cr
Median ₹14.70 Cr
Fund utilisation
85%
₹12.46 Cr recommended · 323 works
Above median (76%)
Paid to vendors
₹7.32 Cr
50% of allocation
Above median (37%)
Works completed
92
28% of recommended
About the median
From recommendation to completion
Every work this MP recommended, by stage
- Recommended by the MP323 works
₹12.46 Cr · 85% of the ₹14.70 Cr allocated
- Sanctioned by the district275 works
85% sanctioned · took 47 days on average (due within 45 days)
- Completed92 works
₹3.90 Cr final cost · 5.5 months from recommendation on average
48 works are still awaiting sanction, 15 of them for more than 45 days.
In plain words
What the numbers say
- Recommended 323 works worth ₹12.46 Cr, a fund utilisation of 85%, higher than 65% of 18th Lok Sabha MPs.
- The district has sanctioned 275 of them, taking 47 days on average.
- ₹7.32 Cr has been paid to vendors, 50% of the allocation.
- 92 works are complete, typically 5.5 months after recommendation. 10 works have geo-tagged photos on eSAKSHI.
- The largest share of funds went to Community buildings & public spaces.
- Payments went to 133 vendors. The largest received 26%.
- No citizen ratings have been reported for completed works.
How the score is made
MP score 48/100: finishing works counts most
- Works completed 30%28Completed ÷ recommended works.
- Spending efficiency 20%53Value of completed works ÷ money paid out. Money paid without works finished scores low.
- Fund utilisation 15%85Value of works recommended ÷ allocated limit (MoSPI’s measure).
- Proof of work 15%11Share of completed works with photos or documents uploaded on eSAKSHI.
- Funds spent 10%50Paid to vendors ÷ allocated limit.
- Vendor diversity 10%92How spread out payments are: full marks when no vendor gets over 20% of the money, none when one vendor gets everything.
i
Members of Parliament (MPs) do not have direct, operational control over the specific vendors selected for government public works. However, they exert significant indirect influence by shaping procurement frameworks, passing supplier diversity laws, and conducting oversight.
Largest vendor: THE CHAWINDA COOPRATIVE LABOUR AND CONSTRUCTION SOCIETY, 26% of payments across 133 vendors.
District sanction speed
97/100 · sanction is the district authority’s job, so this doesn’t change the MP’s rank
- Sanction speed 100%97Average days to sanction (full marks within the 45-day guideline, none at a year), and the share of works not overdue.
Activity over time
Recommendations, payments and completions by month
Sectors
Value of works by category
Who got paid
Top vendors by payments received
Implementing district authorities
The districts that sanction and execute this MP’s works
Works
323 works · the 60 most recent are listed here, all of them in the explorer · tap “Photos” to see geo-tagged photos from eSAKSHI
For Construction of Road With Interlocking Tiles
Roads & bridgesConstruction of roads, link roads, pathways or any other road with or without drainage system· Amritsar· #324330
₹3.0 L Awaiting sanction · 1 daysRec. 31 Oct 2026For Construction of Cremation Ground SC
Community buildings & public spacesCrematoriums / Energy efficient crematoriums or structures on burial / cremation ground· Amritsar· #324347
₹5.0 L Awaiting sanction · 1 daysRec. 31 Oct 2026For Construction of Drains Nikasi Naala Sewerage SC
Sanitation & drainageProviding drains and gutters for public drainage· Amritsar· #324348
₹5.0 L Awaiting sanction · 1 daysRec. 31 Oct 2026For Development of Public Park with Indoor Gym Machines
Community buildings & public spacesDevelopment of public parks· Amritsar· #324651
₹5.0 L Awaiting sanction · 1 daysRec. 31 Oct 2026For Upgradation and Renovation of Library
Education & librariesPurchase of books for public libraries / Digitization of library books· Amritsar· #324653
₹2.3 L Awaiting sanction · 1 daysRec. 31 Oct 2026For Construction of Dharamshala
Community buildings & public spacesConstruction of community centers and community halls· Amritsar· #296722
₹5.0 L Sanctioned · 22 Oct 2026Rec. 24 Jul 2026For Construction of Drains (Sewerage)
Sanitation & drainageProviding drains and gutters for public drainage· Amritsar· #296883
₹3.0 L Sanctioned · 22 Oct 2026Rec. 24 Jul 2026For Construction of Cremation Ground
Community buildings & public spacesCrematoriums / Energy efficient crematoriums or structures on burial / cremation ground· Amritsar· #296910
₹2.0 L Sanctioned · 22 Oct 2026Rec. 24 Jul 2026For Construction of Cremation Ground
Community buildings & public spacesCrematoriums / Energy efficient crematoriums or structures on burial / cremation ground· Amritsar· #296918
₹2.0 L Sanctioned · 22 Oct 2026Rec. 24 Jul 2026For Construction of Dharamshala
Community buildings & public spacesConstruction of community centers and community halls· Amritsar· #296941
₹5.0 L Sanctioned · 22 Oct 2026Rec. 24 Jul 2026For Construction of Bathroom and RO Water Purifier
Sanitation & drainageConstruction of toilet blocks· Amritsar· #296943
₹5.0 L Sanctioned · 22 Oct 2026Rec. 24 Jul 2026For Construction of Community Hall
Community buildings & public spacesConstruction of community centers and community halls· Amritsar· #298874
₹5.0 L Sanctioned · 22 Oct 2026Rec. 12 Aug 2026For Construction of Dharamshala
Community buildings & public spacesConstruction of community centers and community halls· Amritsar· #300740
₹5.0 L Sanctioned · 22 Oct 2026Rec. 12 Aug 2026For Construction of Road with Interlocking Tiles
Roads & bridgesConstruction of roads, link roads, pathways or any other road with or without drainage system· Amritsar· #300743
₹6.7 L Sanctioned · 22 Oct 2026Rec. 12 Aug 2026For Construction of Dharamshala (SC)
Community buildings & public spacesConstruction of community centers and community halls· Amritsar· #303320
₹5.0 L Sanctioned · 22 Oct 2026Rec. 12 Aug 2026
18th Lok Sabha MPs from Punjab
Ranked by MP score
| # | MP | Utilisation | Spent | Completed | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sher Singh Ghubaya · Firozpur | 96% | 66% | 379 | 73 |
| 2 | Smt Harsimrat Kaur Badal · Bhatinda | 100% | 61% | 180 | 67 |
| 3 | Gurmeet Singh Meet Hayer · Sangrur | 79% | 43% | 158 | 63 |
| 4 | Malvinder Singh Kang · Anandpur Sahib | 95% | 61% | 125 | 61 |
| 5 | Dr. Raj Kumar Chabbewal · Hoshiarpur | 97% | 57% | 123 | 60 |
| 6 | Sarabjeet Singh Khalsa · Faridkot | 92% | 71% | 238 | 56 |
| 7 | Dr Dharamvira Gandhi · Patiala | 87% | 42% | 81 | 55 |
| 8 | Shri Amar Singh · Fatehgarh Sahib | 85% | 33% | 79 | 53 |
| 9 | Charanjit Singh Channi · Jalandhar | 48% | 20% | 58 | 50 |
| 10 | Sukhjinder Singh Randhawa · Gurdaspur | 96% | 42% | 96 | 50 |
| 11 | Amrinder Singh Raja Warring · Ludhiana | 64% | 26% | 61 | 49 |
| 12 | Shri Gurjeet Singh Aujla · Amritsar | 85% | 50% | 92 | 48 |
Source: MoSPI eSAKSHI (eSAKSHI API (mplads.mospi.gov.in)). Fund utilisation = works recommended ÷ allocated limit (MoSPI’s definition); spent = vendor payments ÷ allocated limit; completion = completed ÷ recommended works. The MP score weighs completion, spending efficiency, utilisation, proof of work, spending and vendor diversity. How it’s calculated.