Shri Shivesh Kumar

1. Recommended by the MP0 works

   ₹0 · 0% of the ₹4.90 Cr allocated

2. Sanctioned by the district0 works

   — sanctioned

3. Completed0 works

   ₹0 final cost

• No works have been recommended yet against an allocated limit of ₹4.90 Cr.
• ₹0 has been paid to vendors, 0% of the allocation.
• 0 works are complete.
• No citizen ratings have been reported for completed works.

1. Works completed 30%Not enough dataCompleted ÷ recommended works.
2. Spending efficiency 20%Not enough dataValue of completed works ÷ money paid out. Money paid without works finished scores low.
3. Fund utilisation 15%0Value of works recommended ÷ allocated limit (MoSPI’s measure).
4. Proof of work 15%Not enough dataShare of completed works with photos or documents uploaded on eSAKSHI.
5. Funds spent 10%0Paid to vendors ÷ allocated limit.
6. Vendor diversity 10%
   i

   Members of Parliament (MPs) do not have direct, operational control over the specific vendors selected for government public works. However, they exert significant indirect influence by shaping procurement frameworks, passing supplier diversity laws, and conducting oversight.

   Not enough dataHow spread out payments are: full marks when no vendor gets over 20% of the money, none when one vendor gets everything.

1. Sanction speed 100%Not enough dataAverage days to sanction (full marks within the 45-day guideline, none at a year), and the share of works not overdue.

No works recorded yet.

No vendor payments recorded yet.