10th of 15 from Bihar
Most funds not yet used
Works recommended for only 3.4% of the allocated limit.
Allocated limit
₹18.62 Cr
Median ₹14.70 Cr
Fund utilisation
3.4%
₹62.5 L recommended · 6 works
Below median (70%)
Paid to vendors
₹50.8 L
2.7% of allocation
Below median (25%)
Works completed
4
67% of recommended
Above median (26%)
From recommendation to completion
Every work this MP recommended, by stage
- Recommended by the MP6 works
₹62.5 L · 3.4% of the ₹18.62 Cr allocated
- Sanctioned by the district5 works
83% sanctioned · took 2.1 months on average (due within 45 days)
- Completed4 works
₹42.7 L final cost · 6.1 months from recommendation on average
1 works are still awaiting sanction, 1 of them for more than 45 days.
In plain words
What the numbers say
- Recommended 6 works worth ₹62.5 L, a fund utilisation of 3.4%, higher than 13% of Rajya Sabha MPs.
- The district has sanctioned 5 of them, taking 2.1 months on average.
- ₹50.8 L has been paid to vendors, 2.7% of the allocation.
- 4 works are complete, typically 6.1 months after recommendation. 3 works have geo-tagged photos on eSAKSHI.
- The largest share of funds went to Irrigation, flood & environment.
- Payments went to 3 vendors. The largest received 53%.
- No citizen ratings have been reported for completed works.
How the score is made
MP score 52/100: finishing works counts most
- Works completed 30%67Completed ÷ recommended works.
- Spending efficiency 20%84Value of completed works ÷ money paid out. Money paid without works finished scores low.
- Fund utilisation 15%3Value of works recommended ÷ allocated limit (MoSPI’s measure).
- Proof of work 15%60Share of completed works with photos or documents uploaded on eSAKSHI.
- Funds spent 10%3Paid to vendors ÷ allocated limit.
- Vendor diversity 10%58How spread out payments are: full marks when no vendor gets over 20% of the money, none when one vendor gets everything.
i
Members of Parliament (MPs) do not have direct, operational control over the specific vendors selected for government public works. However, they exert significant indirect influence by shaping procurement frameworks, passing supplier diversity laws, and conducting oversight.
Largest vendor: ASSISTANT ENGINEER JHANJHARPUR, 53% of payments across 3 vendors.
District sanction speed
89/100 · sanction is the district authority’s job, so this doesn’t change the MP’s rank
- Sanction speed 100%89Average days to sanction (full marks within the 45-day guideline, none at a year), and the share of works not overdue.
Activity over time
Recommendations, payments and completions by month
Sectors
Value of works by category
Who got paid
Top vendors by payments received
Implementing district authorities
The districts that sanction and execute this MP’s works
Works
6 works · tap “Photos” to see geo-tagged photos from eSAKSHI
Constrution work of new library building in ward no. 13 of Deep Paschim Panchayat.
Education & librariesConstruction of public libraries and reading rooms· Madhubani· #217018
₹9.3 L Completed 24 Mar 2026Rec. 10 Jul 2025Paid ₹9.3 LConstruction of about 400 feet drain on government land beside to the cemetry of ward no.-03 in vill-Sangram of panchayat Sangram under Jhanjharpur block.
Sanitation & drainageProviding drains and gutters for public drainage· Madhubani· #217019
₹9.8 L Completed 24 Mar 2026Rec. 10 Jul 2025Paid ₹9.8 LConstruction of ghat in Vishhari pond of Vill-Ratauli, Panchayat- Sudai Ratauli, ward no-01, block-Ghoghardiha, under Madhubani District.
Irrigation, flood & environmentRenovation of ponds and lakes· Madhubani· #217399
₹9.0 L Completed 16 Dec 2025Rec. 12 Jul 2025Paid ₹9.0 LConstruction work of community building in ward no.-11 of Vill-Arariya under Arariya Sangram Panchayat.
Community buildings & public spacesConstruction of community centers and community halls· Madhubani· #217197
₹9.9 L Vendor Identification · 27 Sept 2025Rec. 11 Jul 2025Paid ₹8.1 LConstruction of ghat in the Agrawal Pokhar of east tola Khojpur block-Babubarhi under Madhubani District.
Irrigation, flood & environmentRenovation of ponds and lakes· Madhubani· #217198
₹14.7 L Completed 24 Sept 2025Rec. 11 Jul 2025Paid ₹14.7 LConstruction of ghat in th pond located next to the Utkramit School, Parsa, Vill.and Panchayat-Parsa, Ward no.-05, block-Jhanjharpur, under Madhubani District.
Irrigation, flood & environmentRenovation of ponds and lakes· Madhubani· #217398
₹9.0 L Awaiting sanction · 477 daysRec. 12 Jul 2025
Rajya Sabha MPs from Bihar
Ranked by MP score
| # | MP | Utilisation | Spent | Completed | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Shri Khiru Mahto | 79% | 78% | 171 | 91 |
| 2 | Dr. Bhim Singh | 98% | 89% | 252 | 80 |
| 3 | Dr. Dharmshila Gupta | 100% | 82% | 96 | 79 |
| 4 | Shri Satish Chandra Dubey | 98% | 77% | 193 | 75 |
| 5 | Shri Shambhu Sharan Patel | 96% | 78% | 203 | 75 |
| 6 | Shri Akhilesh Prasad Singh | 43% | 34% | 47 | 73 |
| 7 | Dr. Faiyaz Ahmad | 100% | 86% | 138 | 72 |
| 8 | Prof. Manoj Kumar Jha | 97% | 49% | 110 | 63 |
| 9 | Shri Manan Kumar Mishra | 37% | 18% | 31 | 56 |
| 10 | Shri Sanjay Kumar Jha | 3.4% | 2.7% | 4 | 52 |
| 11 | Shri Ram Nath Thakur | 82% | 6.5% | 1 | 26 |
| 12 | Shri Sanjay Yadav | 43% | 0% | 0 | 9 |
Source: MoSPI eSAKSHI (eSAKSHI API (mplads.mospi.gov.in)). Fund utilisation = works recommended ÷ allocated limit (MoSPI’s definition); spent = vendor payments ÷ allocated limit; completion = completed ÷ recommended works. The MP score weighs completion, spending efficiency, utilisation, proof of work, spending and vendor diversity. How it’s calculated.