11th of 19 from Tamil Nadu
Most funds not yet used
Works recommended for only 9.2% of the allocated limit.
Allocated limit
₹5.30 Cr
Median ₹14.70 Cr
Fund utilisation
9.2%
₹48.9 L recommended · 6 works
Below median (70%)
Paid to vendors
₹13.9 L
2.6% of allocation
Below median (25%)
Works completed
2
33% of recommended
Above median (26%)
From recommendation to completion
Every work this MP recommended, by stage
- Recommended by the MP6 works
₹48.9 L · 9.2% of the ₹5.30 Cr allocated
- Sanctioned by the district2 works
33% sanctioned · took 1 days on average (due within 45 days)
- Completed2 works
₹13.9 L final cost · 14 days from recommendation on average
4 works are still awaiting sanction.
In plain words
What the numbers say
- Recommended 6 works worth ₹48.9 L, a fund utilisation of 9.2%, higher than 15% of Rajya Sabha MPs.
- The district has sanctioned 2 of them, taking 1 days on average.
- ₹13.9 L has been paid to vendors, 2.6% of the allocation.
- 2 works are complete, typically 14 days after recommendation. 2 works have geo-tagged photos on eSAKSHI.
- The largest share of funds went to Community buildings & public spaces.
- Payments went to 2 vendors. The largest received 64%.
- No citizen ratings have been reported for completed works.
How the score is made
MP score 42/100: finishing works counts most
- Works completed 30%33Completed ÷ recommended works.
- Spending efficiency 20%100Value of completed works ÷ money paid out. Money paid without works finished scores low.
- Fund utilisation 15%9Value of works recommended ÷ allocated limit (MoSPI’s measure).
- Proof of work 15%40Share of completed works with photos or documents uploaded on eSAKSHI.
- Funds spent 10%3Paid to vendors ÷ allocated limit.
- Vendor diversity 10%Not enough dataHow spread out payments are: full marks when no vendor gets over 20% of the money, none when one vendor gets everything.
i
Members of Parliament (MPs) do not have direct, operational control over the specific vendors selected for government public works. However, they exert significant indirect influence by shaping procurement frameworks, passing supplier diversity laws, and conducting oversight.
Largest vendor: SK Foundation, 64% of payments across 2 vendors.
District sanction speed
100/100 · sanction is the district authority’s job, so this doesn’t change the MP’s rank
- Sanction speed 100%100Average days to sanction (full marks within the 45-day guideline, none at a year), and the share of works not overdue.
Activity over time
Recommendations, payments and completions by month
Sectors
Value of works by category
Who got paid
Top vendors by payments received
Implementing district authorities
The districts that sanction and execute this MP’s works
Works
6 works · tap “Photos” to see geo-tagged photos from eSAKSHI
Multipurpose Building at Veeramalai Village and Pt in Kaveripattinam
Community buildings & public spacesConstruction of buildings for community cultural activities· Krishnagiri· #315864
₹9.0 L Completed 5 Oct 2026Rec. 21 Sep 2026Paid ₹9.0 LCompound Wall at PHC in Pannandur Village and Pt in Kaveripattinam
Community buildings & public spacesConstruction of boundary walls of existing public and community buildings· Krishnagiri· #315865
₹5.0 L Completed 5 Oct 2026Rec. 21 Sep 2026Paid ₹5.0 LBus Shelter at Mottupatti Noruppukuttai in Vilangamudi Pt.
Community buildings & public spacesConstruction of bus-sheds or bus-stops· Krishnagiri· #308722
₹5.0 L Awaiting sanction · 41 daysRec. 21 Sep 2026Compound Wall for Bridge leading to Uchankollai via Chinthagampalli in Chinnamattarapalli in Bargur
Community buildings & public spacesConstruction of boundary walls of existing public and community buildings· Krishnagiri· #315873
₹16.0 L Awaiting sanction · 41 daysRec. 21 Sep 2026Multipurpose Building at Jinjampatti in Guttur in Bargur
Community buildings & public spacesConstruction of buildings for community cultural activities· Krishnagiri· #315876
₹9.0 L Awaiting sanction · 41 daysRec. 21 Sep 2026Bus Shelter at Devarajgoundar Vattam in Ampalli in Guttur in Bargur
Community buildings & public spacesConstruction of bus-sheds or bus-stops· Krishnagiri· #315879
₹5.0 L Awaiting sanction · 41 daysRec. 21 Sep 2026
Rajya Sabha MPs from Tamil Nadu
Ranked by MP score
| # | MP | Utilisation | Spent | Completed | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Shri S. Kalyanasundaram | 99% | 86% | 166 | 87 |
| 2 | Shri R. Dharmar | 83% | 79% | 193 | 86 |
| 3 | Shri K.R.N. Rajeshkumar | 77% | 64% | 85 | 82 |
| 4 | Dr. M. Dhanapal | 58% | 27% | 27 | 64 |
| 5 | Shri R. Girirajan | 96% | 71% | 155 | 64 |
| 6 | Shri Ilaiyaraaja | 24% | 21% | 17 | 61 |
| 7 | Shri I.S. Inbadurai | 80% | 24% | 25 | 60 |
| 8 | Shri P. Chidambaram | 86% | 58% | 76 | 60 |
| 9 | Shri S.R. Sivalingam | 67% | 35% | 24 | 55 |
| 10 | Smt. Rajathi | 69% | 26% | 16 | 53 |
| 11 | Dr. M. Thambi Durai | 9.2% | 2.6% | 2 | 42 |
| 12 | Shri P. Wilson | 86% | 11% | 1 | 31 |
Source: MoSPI eSAKSHI (eSAKSHI API (mplads.mospi.gov.in)). Fund utilisation = works recommended ÷ allocated limit (MoSPI’s definition); spent = vendor payments ÷ allocated limit; completion = completed ÷ recommended works. The MP score weighs completion, spending efficiency, utilisation, proof of work, spending and vendor diversity. How it’s calculated.