16th of 19 from Tamil Nadu
Most funds not yet used
Works recommended for only 23% of the allocated limit.
Allocated limit
₹9.28 Cr
Median ₹14.70 Cr
Fund utilisation
23%
₹2.12 Cr recommended · 4 works
Below median (70%)
Paid to vendors
₹76.1 L
8.2% of allocation
Below median (25%)
Works completed
0
0% of recommended
Below median (26%)
From recommendation to completion
Every work this MP recommended, by stage
- Recommended by the MP4 works
₹2.12 Cr · 23% of the ₹9.28 Cr allocated
- Sanctioned by the district1 works
25% sanctioned · took 7.6 months on average (due within 45 days)
- Completed0 works
₹0 final cost
3 works are still awaiting sanction, 3 of them for more than 45 days.
In plain words
What the numbers say
- Recommended 4 works worth ₹2.12 Cr, a fund utilisation of 23%, higher than 20% of Rajya Sabha MPs.
- The district has sanctioned 1 of them, taking 7.6 months on average.
- ₹76.1 L has been paid to vendors, 8.2% of the allocation.
- 0 works are complete.
- The largest share of funds went to Sports & fitness.
- Payments went to 1 vendors. The largest received 100%.
- No citizen ratings have been reported for completed works.
How the score is made
MP score 6/100: finishing works counts most
- Works completed 30%0Completed ÷ recommended works.
- Spending efficiency 20%0Value of completed works ÷ money paid out. Money paid without works finished scores low.
- Fund utilisation 15%23Value of works recommended ÷ allocated limit (MoSPI’s measure).
- Proof of work 15%Not enough dataShare of completed works with photos or documents uploaded on eSAKSHI.
- Funds spent 10%8Paid to vendors ÷ allocated limit.
- Vendor diversity 10%Not enough dataHow spread out payments are: full marks when no vendor gets over 20% of the money, none when one vendor gets everything.
i
Members of Parliament (MPs) do not have direct, operational control over the specific vendors selected for government public works. However, they exert significant indirect influence by shaping procurement frameworks, passing supplier diversity laws, and conducting oversight.
Largest vendor: JS Associates Development India Pvt ltd, 100% of payments across 1 vendors.
District sanction speed
Not enough data yet · sanction is the district authority’s job, so this doesn’t change the MP’s rank
- Sanction speed 100%Not enough dataAverage days to sanction (full marks within the 45-day guideline, none at a year), and the share of works not overdue.
Activity over time
Recommendations, payments and completions by month
Sectors
Value of works by category
Who got paid
Top vendors by payments received
Implementing district authorities
The districts that sanction and execute this MP’s works
Works
4 works · tap “Photos” to see geo-tagged photos from eSAKSHI
Construction of Public Swimming Pool at VOC Park Ward 83 Central Zone Coimbatore Tamil Nadu
Sports & fitnessConstruction of buildings for sports facilities· Coimbatore· #267626
₹1.12 Cr Work partially Completed · 29 Sept 2026Rec. 11 Feb 2026Paid ₹76.1 LConstruction of Community Hall at Kotthiparai
Community buildings & public spacesConstruction of community centers and community halls· Virudhunagar· #273618
₹35.0 L Awaiting sanction · 235 daysRec. 11 Mar 2026Construction of library at Emaneswaram Ward 7 Parmakudi Ramanathapuram
Education & librariesConstruction of public libraries and reading rooms· Ramanathapuram· #273498
₹30.0 L Awaiting sanction · 236 daysRec. 10 Mar 2026Construction of Community Hall at Village Pappakudi, Sub District Sattur, District Virudhanagar, Tamil Nadu
Community buildings & public spacesConstruction of community centers and community halls· Virudhunagar· #267669
₹35.0 L Awaiting sanction · 263 daysRec. 11 Feb 2026
Rajya Sabha MPs from Tamil Nadu
Ranked by MP score
| # | MP | Utilisation | Spent | Completed | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Shri S. Kalyanasundaram | 99% | 86% | 166 | 87 |
| 2 | Shri R. Dharmar | 83% | 79% | 193 | 86 |
| 3 | Shri K.R.N. Rajeshkumar | 77% | 64% | 85 | 82 |
| 4 | Dr. M. Dhanapal | 58% | 27% | 27 | 64 |
| 5 | Shri R. Girirajan | 96% | 71% | 155 | 64 |
| 6 | Shri Ilaiyaraaja | 24% | 21% | 17 | 61 |
| 7 | Shri I.S. Inbadurai | 80% | 24% | 25 | 60 |
| 8 | Shri P. Chidambaram | 86% | 58% | 76 | 60 |
| 9 | Shri S.R. Sivalingam | 67% | 35% | 24 | 55 |
| 10 | Smt. Rajathi | 69% | 26% | 16 | 53 |
| 11 | Dr. M. Thambi Durai | 9.2% | 2.6% | 2 | 42 |
| 12 | Shri P. Wilson | 86% | 11% | 1 | 31 |
Source: MoSPI eSAKSHI (eSAKSHI API (mplads.mospi.gov.in)). Fund utilisation = works recommended ÷ allocated limit (MoSPI’s definition); spent = vendor payments ÷ allocated limit; completion = completed ÷ recommended works. The MP score weighs completion, spending efficiency, utilisation, proof of work, spending and vendor diversity. How it’s calculated.