Allocated limit
₹19.61 Cr
Median ₹14.70 Cr
Fund utilisation
96%
₹18.75 Cr recommended · 649 works
Above median (70%)
Paid to vendors
₹13.71 Cr
70% of allocation
Above median (25%)
Works completed
437
67% of recommended
Above median (26%)
From recommendation to completion
Every work this MP recommended, by stage
- Recommended by the MP649 works
₹18.75 Cr · 96% of the ₹19.61 Cr allocated
- Sanctioned by the district564 works
87% sanctioned · took 5.1 months on average (due within 45 days)
- Completed437 works
₹11.35 Cr final cost · 9.5 months from recommendation on average
85 works are still awaiting sanction, 85 of them for more than 45 days.
In plain words
What the numbers say
- Recommended 649 works worth ₹18.75 Cr, a fund utilisation of 96%, higher than 84% of Rajya Sabha MPs.
- The district has sanctioned 564 of them, taking 5.1 months on average.
- ₹13.71 Cr has been paid to vendors, 70% of the allocation.
- 437 works are complete, typically 9.5 months after recommendation. 288 works have geo-tagged photos on eSAKSHI.
- The largest share of funds went to Electricity & lighting.
- Payments went to 17 vendors. The largest received 46%.
- No citizen ratings have been reported for completed works.
How the score is made
MP score 75/100: finishing works counts most
- Works completed 30%67Completed ÷ recommended works.
- Spending efficiency 20%83Value of completed works ÷ money paid out. Money paid without works finished scores low.
- Fund utilisation 15%96Value of works recommended ÷ allocated limit (MoSPI’s measure).
- Proof of work 15%66Share of completed works with photos or documents uploaded on eSAKSHI.
- Funds spent 10%70Paid to vendors ÷ allocated limit.
- Vendor diversity 10%68How spread out payments are: full marks when no vendor gets over 20% of the money, none when one vendor gets everything.
i
Members of Parliament (MPs) do not have direct, operational control over the specific vendors selected for government public works. However, they exert significant indirect influence by shaping procurement frameworks, passing supplier diversity laws, and conducting oversight.
Largest vendor: shyam swaroop manufacturere, 46% of payments across 17 vendors.
District sanction speed
76/100 · sanction is the district authority’s job, so this doesn’t change the MP’s rank
- Sanction speed 100%76Average days to sanction (full marks within the 45-day guideline, none at a year), and the share of works not overdue.
Activity over time
Recommendations, payments and completions by month
Sectors
Value of works by category
Who got paid
Top vendors by payments received
Implementing district authorities
The districts that sanction and execute this MP’s works
Works
649 works · the 60 most recent are listed here, all of them in the explorer · tap “Photos” to see geo-tagged photos from eSAKSHI
LED SEMI HIGH MAST LIGHT
Electricity & lightingLighting of public spaces· Mahoba· #160708
₹1.7 L Completed 12 Oct 2026Rec. 21 Dec 2024Paid ₹1.7 LLED High Mast Light (6 LED ) with 200 watt, 9 meter poll
Electricity & lightingLighting of public spaces· Hardoi· #289971
₹1.7 L Sanctioned · 8 Sept 2026Rec. 29 Jun 2026LED High Mast Light (6 LED ) with 200 watt, 9 meter poll
Electricity & lightingLighting of public spaces· Hardoi· #289972
₹1.7 L Sanctioned · 8 Sept 2026Rec. 29 Jun 2026LED High Mast Light (8 LED) with 200 Watt,10 meter poll
Electricity & lightingLighting of public spaces· Unnao· #282779
₹2.7 L Sanctioned · 7 Sept 2026Rec. 21 May 2026LED High Mast Light (8 LED) with 200 Watt,10 meter poll
Electricity & lightingLighting of public spaces· Unnao· #282780
₹2.7 L Sanctioned · 7 Sept 2026Rec. 21 May 2026LED High Mast Light (8 LED) with 200 Watt,10 meter poll
Electricity & lightingLighting of public spaces· Unnao· #282781
₹2.7 L Sanctioned · 7 Sept 2026Rec. 21 May 2026LED High Mast Light (8 LED) with 200 Watt,10 meter poll
Electricity & lightingLighting of public spaces· Unnao· #282782
₹2.7 L Sanctioned · 7 Sept 2026Rec. 21 May 2026LED High Mast Light (8 LED) with 200 Watt,10 meter poll
Electricity & lightingLighting of public spaces· Unnao· #282783
₹2.7 L Sanctioned · 7 Sept 2026Rec. 21 May 2026LED High Mast Light (8 LED) with 200 Watt,10 meter poll
Electricity & lightingLighting of public spaces· Unnao· #282784
₹2.7 L Sanctioned · 7 Sept 2026Rec. 21 May 2026LED High Mast Light (8 LED) with 200 Watt,10 meter poll
Electricity & lightingLighting of public spaces· Unnao· #282785
₹2.7 L Sanctioned · 7 Sept 2026Rec. 21 May 2026LED High Mast Light (8 LED) with 200 Watt,10 meter poll
Electricity & lightingLighting of public spaces· Unnao· #282786
₹2.7 L Sanctioned · 7 Sept 2026Rec. 21 May 2026LED High Mast Light (8 LED) with 200 Watt,10 meter poll
Electricity & lightingLighting of public spaces· Unnao· #282787
₹2.7 L Sanctioned · 7 Sept 2026Rec. 21 May 2026LED High Mast Light (8 LED) with 200 Watt,10 meter poll
Electricity & lightingLighting of public spaces· Unnao· #282792
₹2.7 L Sanctioned · 7 Sept 2026Rec. 21 May 2026LED High Mast Light (8 LED) with 200 Watt,10 meter poll
Electricity & lightingLighting of public spaces· Unnao· #282793
₹2.7 L Sanctioned · 7 Sept 2026Rec. 21 May 2026LED High Mast Light (8 LED) with 200 Watt,10 meter poll
Electricity & lightingLighting of public spaces· Unnao· #282794
₹2.7 L Sanctioned · 7 Sept 2026Rec. 21 May 2026
Rajya Sabha MPs from Uttar Pradesh
Ranked by MP score
| # | MP | Utilisation | Spent | Completed | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Shri Mithlesh Kumar | 99% | 93% | 197 | 88 |
| 2 | Smt. Geeta alias Chandraprabha | 100% | 94% | 211 | 88 |
| 3 | Shri B.L. Verma | 100% | 88% | 350 | 83 |
| 4 | Smt. Darshana Singh | 100% | 89% | 31 | 81 |
| 5 | Shri Javed Ali Khan | 99% | 84% | 126 | 79 |
| 6 | Smt. Seema Dwivedi | 100% | 81% | 231 | 79 |
| 7 | Shri Hardeep Singh Puri | 96% | 80% | 344 | 79 |
| 8 | Dr. K. Laxman | 79% | 63% | 275 | 77 |
| 9 | Shri Baburam Nishad | 96% | 70% | 437 | 75 |
| 10 | Smt. Sangeeta Yadav | 100% | 87% | 44 | 73 |
| 11 | Shri Ratanjit Pratap Narain Singh | 79% | 62% | 88 | 70 |
| 12 | Shri Ramji | 100% | 83% | 154 | 68 |
Source: MoSPI eSAKSHI (eSAKSHI API (mplads.mospi.gov.in)). Fund utilisation = works recommended ÷ allocated limit (MoSPI’s definition); spent = vendor payments ÷ allocated limit; completion = completed ÷ recommended works. The MP score weighs completion, spending efficiency, utilisation, proof of work, spending and vendor diversity. How it’s calculated.