24th of 30 from Uttar Pradesh
Works waiting for sanction
79 recommended works are still awaiting sanction more than 45 days later. Sanction is the district authority’s responsibility.
Allocated limit
₹14.70 Cr
Median ₹14.70 Cr
Fund utilisation
64%
₹9.38 Cr recommended · 136 works
Below median (70%)
Paid to vendors
₹3.15 Cr
21% of allocation
Below median (25%)
Works completed
24
18% of recommended
Below median (26%)
From recommendation to completion
Every work this MP recommended, by stage
- Recommended by the MP136 works
₹9.38 Cr · 64% of the ₹14.70 Cr allocated
- Sanctioned by the district57 works
42% sanctioned · took 3.1 months on average (due within 45 days)
- Completed24 works
₹2.29 Cr final cost · 8.0 months from recommendation on average
79 works are still awaiting sanction, 79 of them for more than 45 days.
In plain words
What the numbers say
- Recommended 136 works worth ₹9.38 Cr, a fund utilisation of 64%, higher than 42% of Rajya Sabha MPs.
- The district has sanctioned 57 of them, taking 3.1 months on average.
- ₹3.15 Cr has been paid to vendors, 21% of the allocation.
- 24 works are complete, typically 8.0 months after recommendation. 14 works have geo-tagged photos on eSAKSHI.
- The largest share of funds went to Electricity & lighting.
- Payments went to 14 vendors. The largest received 19%.
- No citizen ratings have been reported for completed works.
How the score is made
MP score 50/100: finishing works counts most
- Works completed 30%18Completed ÷ recommended works.
- Spending efficiency 20%73Value of completed works ÷ money paid out. Money paid without works finished scores low.
- Fund utilisation 15%64Value of works recommended ÷ allocated limit (MoSPI’s measure).
- Proof of work 15%54Share of completed works with photos or documents uploaded on eSAKSHI.
- Funds spent 10%21Paid to vendors ÷ allocated limit.
- Vendor diversity 10%100How spread out payments are: full marks when no vendor gets over 20% of the money, none when one vendor gets everything.
i
Members of Parliament (MPs) do not have direct, operational control over the specific vendors selected for government public works. However, they exert significant indirect influence by shaping procurement frameworks, passing supplier diversity laws, and conducting oversight.
Largest vendor: NARAYAN MARBLES, 19% of payments across 14 vendors.
District sanction speed
63/100 · sanction is the district authority’s job, so this doesn’t change the MP’s rank
- Sanction speed 100%63Average days to sanction (full marks within the 45-day guideline, none at a year), and the share of works not overdue.
Activity over time
Recommendations, payments and completions by month
Sectors
Value of works by category
Who got paid
Top vendors by payments received
Implementing district authorities
The districts that sanction and execute this MP’s works
Works
137 works · the 60 most recent are listed here, all of them in the explorer · tap “Photos” to see geo-tagged photos from eSAKSHI
In view of public interest, I hereby grant approval for the construction of a community marriage hall in Gram Panchayat Saray Dali, Block - Sadar, Tehsil - Sadar, District Pratapgarh, Uttar Pradesh.
Community buildings & public spacesConstruction of community centers and community halls· Pratapgarh· #225467
₹23.8 L Completed 15 Oct 2026Rec. 7 Aug 2025Paid ₹23.8 LFor carrying out tiling work
Education & librariesConstruction of rooms and halls in school and colleges· Pratapgarh· #231064
₹8.8 L Completed 15 Oct 2026Rec. 4 Sep 2025Paid ₹8.8 LFor the construction work of a 200-meter-long CC road.
Roads & bridgesConstruction of roads, link roads, pathways or any other road with or without drainage system· Pratapgarh· #256419
₹8.4 L Completed 15 Oct 2026Rec. 31 Dec 2025Paid ₹8.4 LFor the beautification of the school, construction of swings, an open gym, a track, etc.
Sports & fitnessDevelopment of playground· Pratapgarh· #271402
₹16.7 L Completed 15 Oct 2026Rec. 28 Feb 2026Paid ₹16.7 LAn RO Water ATM with a capacity of 250 LPH, along with a borewell, is proposed to be installed near Maa Nayar Devi Dham, Nagar Panchayat Heeraganj, Tehsil Kunda, Ward No. 7
Drinking waterInstalling community drinking water plants· Pratapgarh· #214669
₹14.1 L Completed 8 Oct 2026Rec. 4 Jul 2025Paid ₹14.1 LAn RO Water ATM with a capacity of 250 LPH, along with a borewell, is proposed to be installed near Maa Chandika Devi Dham, Gram Sabha Chandika, Vikas Khand Sandwa Chandika, Tehsil Sadar, District Pratapgarh, PIN Code 230304
Drinking waterInstalling community drinking water plants· Pratapgarh· #214686
₹14.1 L Completed 8 Oct 2026Rec. 4 Jul 2025Paid ₹14.1 LApproval for construction of a 250-meter CC Road from Patna Devi Dham Link Road via the old kiln of Shivram Bricks Field to the residence of Shri Lal Mani Dwivedi.
Roads & bridgesConstruction of roads, link roads, pathways or any other road with or without drainage system· Pratapgarh· #287761
₹23.2 L Vendor Identification · 21 Sept 2026Rec. 22 Jun 2026Approval is hereby accorded for the construction of a boundary wall, walking track, and installation of steel benches under the New Park Construction project.
Community buildings & public spacesDevelopment of public parks· Pratapgarh· #292952
₹24.9 L Sanctioned · 11 Sept 2026Rec. 8 Jul 2026Construction of Drain from the Main Road to the New Park
Roads & bridgesEstablishing public ground water recharging facilities· Pratapgarh· #292953
₹25.0 L Sanctioned · 11 Sept 2026Rec. 8 Jul 2026Construction of a Cement Concrete (CC) Road from the residence of Shri Algu Nirmal on the Kunda Link Road to the Sports Ground (Open Gym) at Rajapur Bindhan, Kunda Tehsil, Pratapgarh District, Uttar Pradesh.
Roads & bridgesConstruction of roads, link roads, pathways or any other road with or without drainage system· Pratapgarh· #292954
₹24.6 L Sanctioned · 11 Sept 2026Rec. 8 Jul 2026nstallation of 7 Semi High Mast Light Units from the Main Road to the Open Gym Complex and 4 Solar High Mast Light Units in the New Park for Lighting Arrangement
Electricity & lightingLighting of public spaces· Pratapgarh· #292956
₹23.5 L Sanctioned · 11 Sept 2026Rec. 8 Jul 2026Construction of a Room by Divine International Foundation, Haridwar, in Gram Khasmau, Hathgaon Tehsil, Khaga, District Fatehpur, Uttar Pradesh
Education & librariesConstruction of rooms and halls in school and colleges· Fatehpur· #2181
₹10.0 L Awaiting sanction · 80 daysRec. 13 Aug 2026Construction of One Classroom at Virendra Bahadur Mahila Mahavidyalaya, Beend, Mujahi Bazar, Patti, Pratapgarh, Uttar Pradesh.
Education & librariesConstruction of rooms and halls in school and colleges· Pratapgarh· #302235
₹10.0 L Awaiting sanction · 85 daysRec. 8 Aug 2026Construction of One Classroom at Gyan Bharti Intermediate College, Parshadepur, Raebareli, Uttar Pradesh.
Education & librariesConstruction of rooms and halls in school and colleges· Rae Bareli· #2172
₹10.0 L Awaiting sanction · 85 daysRec. 8 Aug 2026Supply and Installation of 1 No. LED High Mast Lighting System (comprising 8 and 200 W LED luminaires mounted on a 10meter GI pole
Electricity & lightingLighting of public spaces· Pratapgarh· #299015
₹2.9 L Awaiting sanction · 95 daysRec. 29 Jul 2026
Rajya Sabha MPs from Uttar Pradesh
Ranked by MP score
| # | MP | Utilisation | Spent | Completed | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Shri Mithlesh Kumar | 99% | 93% | 197 | 88 |
| 2 | Smt. Geeta alias Chandraprabha | 100% | 94% | 211 | 88 |
| 3 | Shri B.L. Verma | 100% | 88% | 350 | 83 |
| 4 | Smt. Darshana Singh | 100% | 89% | 31 | 81 |
| 5 | Shri Javed Ali Khan | 99% | 84% | 126 | 79 |
| 6 | Smt. Seema Dwivedi | 100% | 81% | 231 | 79 |
| 7 | Shri Hardeep Singh Puri | 96% | 80% | 344 | 79 |
| 8 | Dr. K. Laxman | 79% | 63% | 275 | 77 |
| 9 | Shri Baburam Nishad | 96% | 70% | 437 | 75 |
| 10 | Smt. Sangeeta Yadav | 100% | 87% | 44 | 73 |
| 11 | Shri Ratanjit Pratap Narain Singh | 79% | 62% | 88 | 70 |
| 12 | Shri Ramji | 100% | 83% | 154 | 68 |
Source: MoSPI eSAKSHI (eSAKSHI API (mplads.mospi.gov.in)). Fund utilisation = works recommended ÷ allocated limit (MoSPI’s definition); spent = vendor payments ÷ allocated limit; completion = completed ÷ recommended works. The MP score weighs completion, spending efficiency, utilisation, proof of work, spending and vendor diversity. How it’s calculated.