1st of 2 from Meghalaya
Allocated limit
₹14.70 Cr
Median ₹14.70 Cr
Fund utilisation
99%
₹14.57 Cr recommended · 352 works
Above median (76%)
Paid to vendors
₹10.77 Cr
73% of allocation
Above median (37%)
Works completed
145
41% of recommended
Above median (28%)
From recommendation to completion
Every work this MP recommended, by stage
- Recommended by the MP352 works
₹14.57 Cr · 99% of the ₹14.70 Cr allocated
- Sanctioned by the district282 works
80% sanctioned · took 2.7 months on average (due within 45 days)
- Completed145 works
₹5.67 Cr final cost · 11.6 months from recommendation on average
70 works are still awaiting sanction, 60 of them for more than 45 days.
In plain words
What the numbers say
- Recommended 352 works worth ₹14.57 Cr, a fund utilisation of 99%, higher than 93% of 18th Lok Sabha MPs.
- The district has sanctioned 282 of them, taking 2.7 months on average.
- ₹10.77 Cr has been paid to vendors, 73% of the allocation.
- 145 works are complete, typically 11.6 months after recommendation. 120 works have geo-tagged photos on eSAKSHI.
- The largest share of funds went to Roads & bridges.
- Payments went to 190 vendors. The largest received 25%.
- No citizen ratings have been reported for completed works.
How the score is made
MP score 67/100: finishing works counts most
- Works completed 30%41Completed ÷ recommended works.
- Spending efficiency 20%53Value of completed works ÷ money paid out. Money paid without works finished scores low.
- Fund utilisation 15%99Value of works recommended ÷ allocated limit (MoSPI’s measure).
- Proof of work 15%83Share of completed works with photos or documents uploaded on eSAKSHI.
- Funds spent 10%73Paid to vendors ÷ allocated limit.
- Vendor diversity 10%94How spread out payments are: full marks when no vendor gets over 20% of the money, none when one vendor gets everything.
i
Members of Parliament (MPs) do not have direct, operational control over the specific vendors selected for government public works. However, they exert significant indirect influence by shaping procurement frameworks, passing supplier diversity laws, and conducting oversight.
Largest vendor: Aiok M Sangma, 25% of payments across 190 vendors.
District sanction speed
86/100 · sanction is the district authority’s job, so this doesn’t change the MP’s rank
- Sanction speed 100%86Average days to sanction (full marks within the 45-day guideline, none at a year), and the share of works not overdue.
Activity over time
Recommendations, payments and completions by month
Sectors
Value of works by category
Who got paid
Top vendors by payments received
Implementing district authorities
The districts that sanction and execute this MP’s works
Works
352 works · the 60 most recent are listed here, all of them in the explorer · tap “Photos” to see geo-tagged photos from eSAKSHI
Supply of water pump for 20 different villages
Drinking waterProviding supply pipelines for drinking water· South West Garo Hills· #292583
₹2.5 L Sanctioned · 29 Oct 2026Rec. 6 Jul 2026Supply of water pump for 20 different villages
Drinking waterProviding supply pipelines for drinking water· South West Garo Hills· #292584
₹2.5 L Sanctioned · 29 Oct 2026Rec. 6 Jul 2026Supply of water pump for 20 different villages
Drinking waterProviding supply pipelines for drinking water· South West Garo Hills· #292585
₹2.5 L Sanctioned · 29 Oct 2026Rec. 6 Jul 2026Supply of water pump for 20 different villages
Drinking waterProviding supply pipelines for drinking water· South West Garo Hills· #292586
₹2.5 L Sanctioned · 29 Oct 2026Rec. 6 Jul 2026Supply of water pump for 20 different villages
Drinking waterProviding supply pipelines for drinking water· South West Garo Hills· #292587
₹2.5 L Sanctioned · 29 Oct 2026Rec. 6 Jul 2026Supply of water pump for 20 different villages
Drinking waterProviding supply pipelines for drinking water· South West Garo Hills· #292588
₹2.5 L Sanctioned · 29 Oct 2026Rec. 6 Jul 2026Supply of water pump for 20 different villages
Drinking waterProviding supply pipelines for drinking water· South West Garo Hills· #292589
₹2.5 L Sanctioned · 29 Oct 2026Rec. 6 Jul 2026Supply of water pump for 20 different villages
Drinking waterProviding supply pipelines for drinking water· South West Garo Hills· #292590
₹2.5 L Sanctioned · 29 Oct 2026Rec. 6 Jul 2026Supply of water pump for 20 different villages
Drinking waterProviding supply pipelines for drinking water· South West Garo Hills· #292591
₹2.5 L Sanctioned · 29 Oct 2026Rec. 6 Jul 2026Supply of water pump for 20 different villages
Drinking waterProviding supply pipelines for drinking water· South West Garo Hills· #292592
₹2.5 L Sanctioned · 29 Oct 2026Rec. 6 Jul 2026Supply of water pump for 20 different villages
Drinking waterProviding supply pipelines for drinking water· South West Garo Hills· #292593
₹2.5 L Sanctioned · 29 Oct 2026Rec. 6 Jul 2026Supply of water pump for 20 different villages
Drinking waterProviding supply pipelines for drinking water· South West Garo Hills· #292594
₹2.5 L Sanctioned · 29 Oct 2026Rec. 6 Jul 2026Supply of water pump for 20 different villages
Drinking waterProviding supply pipelines for drinking water· South West Garo Hills· #292595
₹2.5 L Sanctioned · 29 Oct 2026Rec. 6 Jul 2026Supply of water pump for 20 different villages
Drinking waterProviding supply pipelines for drinking water· South West Garo Hills· #292596
₹2.5 L Sanctioned · 29 Oct 2026Rec. 6 Jul 2026Supply of water pump for 20 different villages
Drinking waterProviding supply pipelines for drinking water· South West Garo Hills· #292597
₹2.5 L Sanctioned · 29 Oct 2026Rec. 6 Jul 2026
18th Lok Sabha MPs from Meghalaya
Ranked by MP score
| # | MP | Utilisation | Spent | Completed | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Saleng A Sangma · Tura | 99% | 73% | 145 | 67 |
| 2 | Andrew J. Syngkon · Shillong | 100% | 74% | 104 | 66 |
Source: MoSPI eSAKSHI (eSAKSHI API (mplads.mospi.gov.in)). Fund utilisation = works recommended ÷ allocated limit (MoSPI’s definition); spent = vendor payments ÷ allocated limit; completion = completed ÷ recommended works. The MP score weighs completion, spending efficiency, utilisation, proof of work, spending and vendor diversity. How it’s calculated.