Skip to content
MPLADSTracker
This is a record from the 17th Lok Sabha (2019–24). eSAKSHI covers its final year only, from April 2023. Comparisons are with other 17th Lok Sabha MPs.

MPLADS report card · 17th Lok Sabha

Rattan Lal Kataria

Lok SabhaSC seatAmbala · Haryana

MP score—/100

Allocated limit

₹0

Median ₹8.60 Cr

Fund utilisation

—

₹0 recommended · 0 works

Paid to vendors

₹0

— of allocation

Works completed

0

— of recommended

From recommendation to completion

Every work this MP recommended, by stage

  1. Recommended by the MP0 works

    ₹0 · — of the ₹0 allocated

  2. Sanctioned by the district0 works

    — sanctioned

  3. Completed0 works

    ₹0 final cost

In plain words

What the numbers say

  • No works have been recommended yet against an allocated limit of ₹0.
  • ₹0 has been paid to vendors, — of the allocation.
  • 0 works are complete.
  • No citizen ratings have been reported for completed works.

How the score is made

MP score —/100: finishing works counts most

  1. Works completed 30%Not enough dataCompleted ÷ recommended works.
  2. Spending efficiency 20%Not enough dataValue of completed works ÷ money paid out. Money paid without works finished scores low.
  3. Fund utilisation 15%Not enough dataValue of works recommended ÷ allocated limit (MoSPI’s measure).
  4. Proof of work 15%Not enough dataShare of completed works with photos or documents uploaded on eSAKSHI.
  5. Funds spent 10%Not enough dataPaid to vendors ÷ allocated limit.
  6. Vendor diversity 10%
    i

    Members of Parliament (MPs) do not have direct, operational control over the specific vendors selected for government public works. However, they exert significant indirect influence by shaping procurement frameworks, passing supplier diversity laws, and conducting oversight.

    Not enough data
    How spread out payments are: full marks when no vendor gets over 20% of the money, none when one vendor gets everything.

District sanction speed

Not enough data yet · sanction is the district authority’s job, so this doesn’t change the MP’s rank

  1. Sanction speed 100%Not enough dataAverage days to sanction (full marks within the 45-day guideline, none at a year), and the share of works not overdue.

Activity over time

Recommendations, payments and completions by month

Value of works MPs recommended each month

No dated records.

Sectors

Value of works by category

No works recorded yet.

Who got paid

Top vendors by payments received

No vendor payments recorded yet.

Works

0 works · tap “Photos” to see geo-tagged photos from eSAKSHI

Open in explorer

No works recorded for this MP yet.

17th Lok Sabha MPs from Haryana

Ranked by MP score

#MPUtilisationSpentCompletedScore
1Arvind Kumar Sharma · Rohtak89%73%12985
2Nayab Singh · Kurukshetra84%75%9181
3Rao Inderjit Singh · Gurgaon92%72%8580
4Sanjay Bhatia · Karnal94%80%9879
5Shri Dharambir Singh · Bhiwani Mahendragarh90%82%10079
6Ramesh Chander Kaushik · Sonepat92%73%6971
7Sunita Duggal · Sirsa95%70%11271
8Krishan Pal Gurjar · Faridabad94%65%8466
9Brijendra Singh · Hisar93%81%18862
—Rattan Lal Kataria · Ambala——0n/a

Source: MoSPI eSAKSHI (eSAKSHI API (mplads.mospi.gov.in)). Fund utilisation = works recommended ÷ allocated limit (MoSPI’s definition); spent = vendor payments ÷ allocated limit; completion = completed ÷ recommended works. The MP score weighs completion, spending efficiency, utilisation, proof of work, spending and vendor diversity. How it’s calculated.