6th of 7 from Punjab
Most funds not yet used
Works recommended for only 19% of the allocated limit.
Payments concentrated with one vendor
59% of vendor payments went to Brightway Contractor and Developers.
Allocated limit
₹23.72 Cr
Median ₹14.70 Cr
Fund utilisation
19%
₹4.46 Cr recommended · 6 works
Below median (70%)
Paid to vendors
₹3.56 Cr
15% of allocation
Below median (25%)
Works completed
4
67% of recommended
Above median (26%)
From recommendation to completion
Every work this MP recommended, by stage
- Recommended by the MP6 works
₹4.46 Cr · 19% of the ₹23.72 Cr allocated
- Sanctioned by the district6 works
100% sanctioned · took 2.1 months on average (due within 45 days)
- Completed4 works
₹70.9 L final cost · 6.4 months from recommendation on average
In plain words
What the numbers say
- Recommended 6 works worth ₹4.46 Cr, a fund utilisation of 19%, higher than 19% of Rajya Sabha MPs.
- The district has sanctioned 6 of them, taking 2.1 months on average.
- ₹3.56 Cr has been paid to vendors, 15% of the allocation.
- 4 works are complete, typically 6.4 months after recommendation. 3 works have geo-tagged photos on eSAKSHI.
- The largest share of funds went to Irrigation, flood & environment.
- Payments went to 19 vendors. The largest received 59%.
- No citizen ratings have been reported for completed works.
How the score is made
MP score 42/100: finishing works counts most
- Works completed 30%67Completed ÷ recommended works.
- Spending efficiency 20%20Value of completed works ÷ money paid out. Money paid without works finished scores low.
- Fund utilisation 15%19Value of works recommended ÷ allocated limit (MoSPI’s measure).
- Proof of work 15%60Share of completed works with photos or documents uploaded on eSAKSHI.
- Funds spent 10%15Paid to vendors ÷ allocated limit.
- Vendor diversity 10%51How spread out payments are: full marks when no vendor gets over 20% of the money, none when one vendor gets everything.
i
Members of Parliament (MPs) do not have direct, operational control over the specific vendors selected for government public works. However, they exert significant indirect influence by shaping procurement frameworks, passing supplier diversity laws, and conducting oversight.
Largest vendor: Brightway Contractor and Developers, 59% of payments across 19 vendors.
District sanction speed
97/100 · sanction is the district authority’s job, so this doesn’t change the MP’s rank
- Sanction speed 100%97Average days to sanction (full marks within the 45-day guideline, none at a year), and the share of works not overdue.
Activity over time
Recommendations, payments and completions by month
Sectors
Value of works by category
Who got paid
Top vendors by payments received
Implementing district authorities
The districts that sanction and execute this MP’s works
Works
6 works · tap “Photos” to see geo-tagged photos from eSAKSHI
construction of indoor stadium
Sports & fitnessConstruction of stadiums· Rupnagar· #269867
₹1.00 Cr Vendor Identification · 16 Mar 2026Rec. 20 Feb 2026Paid ₹37.6 Lstrengthening of flood protection bandh embankment in gurdaspur District.
Irrigation, flood & environmentConstruction of flood control embankments/protection walls along riverbanks, hilltops, roadsides· Gurdaspur· #231145
₹2.75 Cr Vendor Identification · 17 Nov 2025Rec. 3 Sep 2025Paid ₹2.47 CrProcurement of jcb machine,tractor trolly, mud loader for desilting sand depositeon agricultural land and other affected areas in flood hit villages.
Sanitation & drainagePurchase of mobile sanitation equipment· Amritsar· #231139
₹49.5 L Completed 7 Nov 2025Rec. 3 Sep 2025Paid ₹49.5 LFencing and Benches
Sports & fitnessDevelopment of playfields and sports grounds· S.A.S Nagar· #134594
₹7.6 L Completed 9 Oct 2025Rec. 5 Aug 2024Paid ₹7.6 LConstruction of Volleyball Court
Sports & fitnessDevelopment of playfields and sports grounds· S.A.S Nagar· #134199
₹6.9 L Completed 25 Dec 2024Rec. 5 Aug 2024Paid ₹6.9 LFencing and Benches
Sports & fitnessDevelopment of playfields and sports grounds· S.A.S Nagar· #134200
₹6.8 L Completed 25 Dec 2024Rec. 5 Aug 2024Paid ₹6.8 L
Rajya Sabha MPs from Punjab
Ranked by MP score
| # | MP | Utilisation | Spent | Completed | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dr. Sandeep Kumar Pathak | 91% | 79% | 186 | 75 |
| 2 | Shri Sant Balbir Singh | 97% | 73% | 207 | 73 |
| 3 | Dr. Vikramjit Singh Sahney | 94% | 63% | 28 | 64 |
| 4 | Shri Harbhajan Singh | 81% | 50% | 78 | 57 |
| 5 | Dr. Ashok Kumar Mittal | 41% | 20% | 15 | 51 |
| 6 | Shri Raghav Chadha | 19% | 15% | 4 | 42 |
| 7 | Shri Rajinder Gupta | 0% | 0% | 0 | 0 |
Source: MoSPI eSAKSHI (eSAKSHI API (mplads.mospi.gov.in)). Fund utilisation = works recommended ÷ allocated limit (MoSPI’s definition); spent = vendor payments ÷ allocated limit; completion = completed ÷ recommended works. The MP score weighs completion, spending efficiency, utilisation, proof of work, spending and vendor diversity. How it’s calculated.