Compare
Compare MPs side by side
Pick up to four MPs. The link updates as you go, so you can share the comparison.
Smt. Seema DwivediRajya Sabha · Uttar PradeshShri Mithlesh KumarRajya Sabha · Uttar PradeshSmt. Geeta alias ChandraprabhaRajya Sabha · Uttar Pradesh
| Metric | Smt. Seema Dwivedi | Shri Mithlesh Kumar | Smt. Geeta alias Chandraprabha |
|---|---|---|---|
| Who | |||
| House | Rajya Sabha | Rajya Sabha | Rajya Sabha |
| Constituency / state | Uttar Pradesh | Uttar Pradesh | Uttar Pradesh |
| Money | |||
| Allocated limit | ₹17.38 Cr | ₹19.61 Cr | ₹19.61 Cr |
| Works recommended (₹) | ₹17.38 Cr | ₹19.49 Cr | ₹19.61 Cr(best) |
| Fund utilisationRecommended ₹ ÷ allocated ₹ (MoSPI’s measure) | 100% | 99% | 100%(best) |
| Paid to vendors (₹) | ₹14.08 Cr | ₹18.27 Cr | ₹18.37 Cr(best) |
| SpentPaid ₹ ÷ allocated ₹ | 81% | 93% | 94%(best) |
| Works | |||
| Works recommended | 428(best) | 204 | 247 |
| Sanctioned by districtSanctioned ÷ recommended works | 92% | 99% | 100%(best) |
| Avg time to sanctionGuideline: within 45 days | 54 days | 52 days(best) | 2.0 months |
| Awaiting sanction > 45 days | 11 | 3 | 0(best) |
| Works completed | 231(best) | 197 | 211 |
| Completion rateCompleted ÷ recommended works | 54% | 97%(best) | 85% |
| Works pending | 197 | 7 | 36 |
| Avg citizen rating | — | — | — |
| Avg time to complete | 12.7 months | 7.0 months(best) | 20.0 months |
| Top sector | Electricity & lighting | Electricity & lighting | Electricity & lighting |
| Vendors | |||
| Vendors paid | 37 | 11 | 6 |
| Largest vendor’s shareShare of this MP’s vendor payments going to the single largest vendor | 33% | 31%(best) | 55% |
| Overall | |||
| MP scoreCompletion, spending efficiency, utilisation, proof of work, spending and vendor diversity. See About | 79 | 88(best) | 88 |
| Rank in house | 14 of 235 | 3 of 235 | 4 of 235 |
| Rank in state | 6 of 30 | 1 of 30 | 2 of 30 |
● marks the best value in a row where higher (or, for time and vendor share, lower) is clearly better. Rajya Sabha and Lok Sabha MPs work under different rules; compare like with like where you can.