Compare
Compare MPs side by side
Pick up to four MPs. The link updates as you go, so you can share the comparison.
Shri Rajneesh Kumar AgrawalRajya Sabha · Madhya PradeshDr. Kavita PatidarRajya Sabha · Madhya PradeshSmt. Sumitra BalmikRajya Sabha · Madhya Pradesh
| Metric | Shri Rajneesh Kumar Agrawal | Dr. Kavita Patidar | Smt. Sumitra Balmik |
|---|---|---|---|
| Who | |||
| House | Rajya Sabha | Rajya Sabha | Rajya Sabha |
| Constituency / state | Madhya Pradesh | Madhya Pradesh | Madhya Pradesh |
| Money | |||
| Allocated limit | ₹4.90 Cr | ₹19.71 Cr | ₹19.61 Cr |
| Works recommended (₹) | ₹87.9 L | ₹16.97 Cr | ₹18.66 Cr(best) |
| Fund utilisationRecommended ₹ ÷ allocated ₹ (MoSPI’s measure) | 18% | 86% | 95%(best) |
| Paid to vendors (₹) | ₹0 | ₹13.49 Cr | ₹16.99 Cr(best) |
| SpentPaid ₹ ÷ allocated ₹ | 0% | 68% | 87%(best) |
| Works | |||
| Works recommended | 4 | 252(best) | 178 |
| Sanctioned by districtSanctioned ÷ recommended works | 0% | 85%(best) | 81% |
| Avg time to sanctionGuideline: within 45 days | — | 2.7 months(best) | 3.3 months |
| Awaiting sanction > 45 days | 2(best) | 3 | 33 |
| Works completed | 0 | 145(best) | 62 |
| Completion rateCompleted ÷ recommended works | 0% | 58%(best) | 35% |
| Works pending | 4 | 107 | 116 |
| Avg citizen rating | — | — | — |
| Avg time to complete | — | 8.5 months(best) | 16.3 months |
| Top sector | Community buildings & public spaces | Community buildings & public spaces | Roads & bridges |
| Vendors | |||
| Vendors paid | 0 | 69 | 131 |
| Largest vendor’s shareShare of this MP’s vendor payments going to the single largest vendor | — | 18% | 5.9%(best) |
| Overall | |||
| MP scoreCompletion, spending efficiency, utilisation, proof of work, spending and vendor diversity. See About | 5 | 73(best) | 65 |
| Rank in house | 195 of 235 | 25 of 235 | 47 of 235 |
| Rank in state | 8 of 10 | 1 of 10 | 2 of 10 |
● marks the best value in a row where higher (or, for time and vendor share, lower) is clearly better. Rajya Sabha and Lok Sabha MPs work under different rules; compare like with like where you can.