Compare
Compare MPs side by side
Pick up to four MPs. The link updates as you go, so you can share the comparison.
Dr. Rajesh MishraSidhi · Madhya PradeshDurga Das UikeyBetul · Madhya PradeshGyaneshwar PatilKhandwa · Madhya Pradesh
| Metric | Dr. Rajesh Mishra | Durga Das Uikey | Gyaneshwar Patil |
|---|---|---|---|
| Who | |||
| House | Lok Sabha | Lok Sabha | Lok Sabha |
| Constituency / state | Sidhi, Madhya Pradesh | Betul, Madhya Pradesh | Khandwa, Madhya Pradesh |
| Money | |||
| Allocated limit | ₹26.27 Cr | ₹15.16 Cr | ₹15.57 Cr |
| Works recommended (₹) | ₹24.21 Cr(best) | ₹15.05 Cr | ₹13.49 Cr |
| Fund utilisationRecommended ₹ ÷ allocated ₹ (MoSPI’s measure) | 92% | 99%(best) | 87% |
| Paid to vendors (₹) | ₹18.88 Cr(best) | ₹8.59 Cr | ₹9.07 Cr |
| SpentPaid ₹ ÷ allocated ₹ | 72%(best) | 57% | 58% |
| Works | |||
| Works recommended | 350 | 499(best) | 417 |
| Sanctioned by districtSanctioned ÷ recommended works | 90%(best) | 82% | 86% |
| Avg time to sanctionGuideline: within 45 days | 3.0 months | 2.4 months(best) | 2.5 months |
| Awaiting sanction > 45 days | 31 | 87 | 14(best) |
| Works completed | 172 | 288(best) | 233 |
| Completion rateCompleted ÷ recommended works | 49% | 58%(best) | 56% |
| Works pending | 178 | 211 | 184 |
| Avg citizen rating | — | — | — |
| Avg time to complete | 9.7 months(best) | 11.6 months | 11.5 months |
| Top sector | Electricity & lighting | Community buildings & public spaces | Electricity & lighting |
| Vendors | |||
| Vendors paid | 84 | 76 | 91 |
| Largest vendor’s shareShare of this MP’s vendor payments going to the single largest vendor | 32%(best) | 49% | 38% |
| Overall | |||
| MP scoreCompletion, spending efficiency, utilisation, proof of work, spending and vendor diversity. See About | 59 | 75(best) | 73 |
| Rank in house | 219 of 542 | 45 of 542 | 56 of 542 |
| Rank in state | 10 of 29 | 1 of 29 | 2 of 29 |
● marks the best value in a row where higher (or, for time and vendor share, lower) is clearly better. Rajya Sabha and Lok Sabha MPs work under different rules; compare like with like where you can.