Compare
Compare MPs side by side
Pick up to four MPs. The link updates as you go, so you can share the comparison.
Kamlesh JangdeJanjgir Champa · ChhattisgarhJyotsna Charandas MahantKorba · ChhattisgarhRadhe Shyam RathiyaRaigarh · Chhattisgarh
| Metric | Kamlesh Jangde | Jyotsna Charandas Mahant | Radhe Shyam Rathiya |
|---|---|---|---|
| Who | |||
| House | Lok Sabha | Lok Sabha | Lok Sabha |
| Constituency / state | Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh | Korba, Chhattisgarh | Raigarh, Chhattisgarh |
| Money | |||
| Allocated limit | ₹15.04 Cr | ₹15.52 Cr | ₹15.97 Cr |
| Works recommended (₹) | ₹13.78 Cr | ₹13.06 Cr | ₹13.90 Cr(best) |
| Fund utilisationRecommended ₹ ÷ allocated ₹ (MoSPI’s measure) | 92%(best) | 84% | 87% |
| Paid to vendors (₹) | ₹10.22 Cr(best) | ₹7.97 Cr | ₹8.70 Cr |
| SpentPaid ₹ ÷ allocated ₹ | 68%(best) | 51% | 55% |
| Works | |||
| Works recommended | 434(best) | 348 | 179 |
| Sanctioned by districtSanctioned ÷ recommended works | 81% | 89%(best) | 83% |
| Avg time to sanctionGuideline: within 45 days | 2.4 months | 54 days(best) | 2.7 months |
| Awaiting sanction > 45 days | 0 | 13 | 0 |
| Works completed | 261(best) | 152 | 77 |
| Completion rateCompleted ÷ recommended works | 60%(best) | 44% | 43% |
| Works pending | 173 | 196 | 102 |
| Avg citizen rating | — | — | — |
| Avg time to complete | 5.8 months(best) | 10.1 months | 10.1 months |
| Top sector | Drinking water | Community buildings & public spaces | Roads & bridges |
| Vendors | |||
| Vendors paid | 78 | 218 | 106 |
| Largest vendor’s shareShare of this MP’s vendor payments going to the single largest vendor | 16% | 4.0%(best) | 4.2% |
| Overall | |||
| MP scoreCompletion, spending efficiency, utilisation, proof of work, spending and vendor diversity. See About | 79(best) | 68 | 67 |
| Rank in house | 25 of 542 | 121 of 542 | 129 of 542 |
| Rank in state | 1 of 11 | 2 of 11 | 3 of 11 |
● marks the best value in a row where higher (or, for time and vendor share, lower) is clearly better. Rajya Sabha and Lok Sabha MPs work under different rules; compare like with like where you can.