Compare
Compare MPs side by side
Pick up to four MPs. The link updates as you go, so you can share the comparison.
Shri Brij LalRajya Sabha · Uttar PradeshShri Mithlesh KumarRajya Sabha · Uttar PradeshSmt. Geeta alias ChandraprabhaRajya Sabha · Uttar Pradesh
| Metric | Shri Brij Lal | Shri Mithlesh Kumar | Smt. Geeta alias Chandraprabha |
|---|---|---|---|
| Who | |||
| House | Rajya Sabha | Rajya Sabha | Rajya Sabha |
| Constituency / state | Uttar Pradesh | Uttar Pradesh | Uttar Pradesh |
| Money | |||
| Allocated limit | ₹19.61 Cr | ₹19.61 Cr | ₹19.61 Cr |
| Works recommended (₹) | ₹19.61 Cr | ₹19.49 Cr | ₹19.61 Cr(best) |
| Fund utilisationRecommended ₹ ÷ allocated ₹ (MoSPI’s measure) | 100% | 99% | 100%(best) |
| Paid to vendors (₹) | ₹9.38 Cr | ₹18.27 Cr | ₹18.37 Cr(best) |
| SpentPaid ₹ ÷ allocated ₹ | 48% | 93% | 94%(best) |
| Works | |||
| Works recommended | 151 | 204 | 247(best) |
| Sanctioned by districtSanctioned ÷ recommended works | 97% | 99% | 100%(best) |
| Avg time to sanctionGuideline: within 45 days | 3.1 months | 52 days(best) | 2.0 months |
| Awaiting sanction > 45 days | 3 | 3 | 0(best) |
| Works completed | 114 | 197 | 211(best) |
| Completion rateCompleted ÷ recommended works | 75% | 97%(best) | 85% |
| Works pending | 37 | 7 | 36 |
| Avg citizen rating | — | — | — |
| Avg time to complete | 5.1 months(best) | 7.0 months | 20.0 months |
| Top sector | Education & libraries | Electricity & lighting | Electricity & lighting |
| Vendors | |||
| Vendors paid | 23 | 11 | 6 |
| Largest vendor’s shareShare of this MP’s vendor payments going to the single largest vendor | 18%(best) | 31% | 55% |
| Overall | |||
| MP scoreCompletion, spending efficiency, utilisation, proof of work, spending and vendor diversity. See About | 57 | 88(best) | 88 |
| Rank in house | 84 of 235 | 3 of 235 | 4 of 235 |
| Rank in state | 20 of 30 | 1 of 30 | 2 of 30 |
● marks the best value in a row where higher (or, for time and vendor share, lower) is clearly better. Rajya Sabha and Lok Sabha MPs work under different rules; compare like with like where you can.