Compare
Compare MPs side by side
Pick up to four MPs. The link updates as you go, so you can share the comparison.
Anil BaluniGarhwal · UttarakhandAjay BhattNainital Udham Singh Nag. · UttarakhandMala Rajya Laxmi ShahTehri Garhwal · Uttarakhand
| Metric | Anil Baluni | Ajay Bhatt | Mala Rajya Laxmi Shah |
|---|---|---|---|
| Who | |||
| House | Lok Sabha | Lok Sabha | Lok Sabha |
| Constituency / state | Garhwal, Uttarakhand | Nainital Udham Singh Nag., Uttarakhand | Tehri Garhwal, Uttarakhand |
| Money | |||
| Allocated limit | ₹14.70 Cr | ₹14.70 Cr | ₹14.70 Cr |
| Works recommended (₹) | ₹2.02 Cr | ₹12.83 Cr(best) | ₹10.05 Cr |
| Fund utilisationRecommended ₹ ÷ allocated ₹ (MoSPI’s measure) | 14% | 87%(best) | 68% |
| Paid to vendors (₹) | ₹50.8 L | ₹5.66 Cr | ₹6.49 Cr(best) |
| SpentPaid ₹ ÷ allocated ₹ | 3.5% | 39% | 44%(best) |
| Works | |||
| Works recommended | 16 | 511(best) | 257 |
| Sanctioned by districtSanctioned ÷ recommended works | 63% | 79%(best) | 74% |
| Avg time to sanctionGuideline: within 45 days | 4.4 months | 4.4 months | 3.6 months(best) |
| Awaiting sanction > 45 days | 3(best) | 73 | 36 |
| Works completed | 1 | 117(best) | 84 |
| Completion rateCompleted ÷ recommended works | 6.3% | 23% | 33%(best) |
| Works pending | 15 | 394 | 173 |
| Avg citizen rating | — | — | — |
| Avg time to complete | 4.6 months(best) | 9.2 months | 6.8 months |
| Top sector | Health | Community buildings & public spaces | Roads & bridges |
| Vendors | |||
| Vendors paid | 7 | 588 | 160 |
| Largest vendor’s shareShare of this MP’s vendor payments going to the single largest vendor | 59% | 4.9%(best) | 31% |
| Overall | |||
| MP scoreCompletion, spending efficiency, utilisation, proof of work, spending and vendor diversity. See About | 14 | 55(best) | 45 |
| Rank in house | 527 of 542 | 281 of 542 | 406 of 542 |
| Rank in state | 5 of 5 | 1 of 5 | 2 of 5 |
● marks the best value in a row where higher (or, for time and vendor share, lower) is clearly better. Rajya Sabha and Lok Sabha MPs work under different rules; compare like with like where you can.