Compare
Compare MPs side by side
Pick up to four MPs. The link updates as you go, so you can share the comparison.
Varun ChaudhryAmbala · HaryanaNaveen JindalKurukshetra · HaryanaDeepender Singh HoodaRohtak · Haryana
| Metric | Varun Chaudhry | Naveen Jindal | Deepender Singh Hooda |
|---|---|---|---|
| Who | |||
| House | Lok Sabha | Lok Sabha | Lok Sabha |
| Constituency / state | Ambala, Haryana | Kurukshetra, Haryana | Rohtak, Haryana |
| Money | |||
| Allocated limit | ₹25.55 Cr | ₹14.70 Cr | ₹14.70 Cr |
| Works recommended (₹) | ₹12.62 Cr | ₹11.76 Cr | ₹13.49 Cr(best) |
| Fund utilisationRecommended ₹ ÷ allocated ₹ (MoSPI’s measure) | 49% | 80% | 92%(best) |
| Paid to vendors (₹) | ₹3.47 Cr | ₹6.43 Cr(best) | ₹6.37 Cr |
| SpentPaid ₹ ÷ allocated ₹ | 14% | 44%(best) | 43% |
| Works | |||
| Works recommended | 158 | 300(best) | 195 |
| Sanctioned by districtSanctioned ÷ recommended works | 91%(best) | 66% | 79% |
| Avg time to sanctionGuideline: within 45 days | 2.6 months | 2.4 months(best) | 3.8 months |
| Awaiting sanction > 45 days | 15 | 7(best) | 31 |
| Works completed | 9 | 145(best) | 71 |
| Completion rateCompleted ÷ recommended works | 5.7% | 48%(best) | 36% |
| Works pending | 149 | 155 | 124 |
| Avg citizen rating | — | — | — |
| Avg time to complete | 12.0 months | 11.1 months | 8.8 months(best) |
| Top sector | Community buildings & public spaces | Community buildings & public spaces | Community buildings & public spaces |
| Vendors | |||
| Vendors paid | 51 | 119 | 90 |
| Largest vendor’s shareShare of this MP’s vendor payments going to the single largest vendor | 5.8% | 4.4%(best) | 12% |
| Overall | |||
| MP scoreCompletion, spending efficiency, utilisation, proof of work, spending and vendor diversity. See About | 35 | 70(best) | 67 |
| Rank in house | 468 of 542 | 92 of 542 | 127 of 542 |
| Rank in state | 8 of 10 | 1 of 10 | 2 of 10 |
● marks the best value in a row where higher (or, for time and vendor share, lower) is clearly better. Rajya Sabha and Lok Sabha MPs work under different rules; compare like with like where you can.