Compare
Compare MPs side by side
Pick up to four MPs. The link updates as you go, so you can share the comparison.
Tokhan SahuBilaspur · ChhattisgarhKamlesh JangdeJanjgir Champa · ChhattisgarhJyotsna Charandas MahantKorba · Chhattisgarh
| Metric | Tokhan Sahu | Kamlesh Jangde | Jyotsna Charandas Mahant |
|---|---|---|---|
| Who | |||
| House | Lok Sabha | Lok Sabha | Lok Sabha |
| Constituency / state | Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh | Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh | Korba, Chhattisgarh |
| Money | |||
| Allocated limit | ₹14.70 Cr | ₹15.04 Cr | ₹15.52 Cr |
| Works recommended (₹) | ₹10.54 Cr | ₹13.78 Cr(best) | ₹13.06 Cr |
| Fund utilisationRecommended ₹ ÷ allocated ₹ (MoSPI’s measure) | 72% | 92%(best) | 84% |
| Paid to vendors (₹) | ₹5.83 Cr | ₹10.22 Cr(best) | ₹7.97 Cr |
| SpentPaid ₹ ÷ allocated ₹ | 40% | 68%(best) | 51% |
| Works | |||
| Works recommended | 134 | 434(best) | 348 |
| Sanctioned by districtSanctioned ÷ recommended works | 93%(best) | 81% | 89% |
| Avg time to sanctionGuideline: within 45 days | 2.8 months | 2.4 months | 54 days(best) |
| Awaiting sanction > 45 days | 9 | 0(best) | 13 |
| Works completed | 46 | 261(best) | 152 |
| Completion rateCompleted ÷ recommended works | 34% | 60%(best) | 44% |
| Works pending | 88 | 173 | 196 |
| Avg citizen rating | — | — | — |
| Avg time to complete | 9.8 months | 5.8 months(best) | 10.1 months |
| Top sector | Community buildings & public spaces | Drinking water | Community buildings & public spaces |
| Vendors | |||
| Vendors paid | 95 | 78 | 218 |
| Largest vendor’s shareShare of this MP’s vendor payments going to the single largest vendor | 5.4% | 16% | 4.0%(best) |
| Overall | |||
| MP scoreCompletion, spending efficiency, utilisation, proof of work, spending and vendor diversity. See About | 55 | 79(best) | 68 |
| Rank in house | 278 of 542 | 25 of 542 | 121 of 542 |
| Rank in state | 9 of 11 | 1 of 11 | 2 of 11 |
● marks the best value in a row where higher (or, for time and vendor share, lower) is clearly better. Rajya Sabha and Lok Sabha MPs work under different rules; compare like with like where you can.