Compare
Compare MPs side by side
Pick up to four MPs. The link updates as you go, so you can share the comparison.
Mohite Patil Dhairyasheel RajsinhMadha · MaharashtraSmita Uday WaghJalgaon · MaharashtraAdv Gowaal Kagada PadaviNandurbar · Maharashtra
| Metric | Mohite Patil Dhairyasheel Rajsinh | Smita Uday Wagh | Adv Gowaal Kagada Padavi |
|---|---|---|---|
| Who | |||
| House | Lok Sabha | Lok Sabha | Lok Sabha |
| Constituency / state | Madha, Maharashtra | Jalgaon, Maharashtra | Nandurbar, Maharashtra |
| Money | |||
| Allocated limit | ₹19.56 Cr | ₹14.81 Cr | ₹14.78 Cr |
| Works recommended (₹) | ₹9.53 Cr(best) | ₹1.60 Cr | ₹8.81 Cr |
| Fund utilisationRecommended ₹ ÷ allocated ₹ (MoSPI’s measure) | 49% | 11% | 60%(best) |
| Paid to vendors (₹) | ₹1.07 Cr | ₹1.40 Cr | ₹3.30 Cr(best) |
| SpentPaid ₹ ÷ allocated ₹ | 5.5% | 9.5% | 22%(best) |
| Works | |||
| Works recommended | 259 | 10 | 279(best) |
| Sanctioned by districtSanctioned ÷ recommended works | 26% | 100%(best) | 87% |
| Avg time to sanctionGuideline: within 45 days | 8.7 months | 4.3 months(best) | 5.1 months |
| Awaiting sanction > 45 days | 192 | 0(best) | 36 |
| Works completed | 41 | 9 | 191(best) |
| Completion rateCompleted ÷ recommended works | 16% | 90%(best) | 68% |
| Works pending | 218 | 1 | 88 |
| Avg citizen rating | — | — | — |
| Avg time to complete | 11.2 months | 7.8 months(best) | 9.3 months |
| Top sector | Electricity & lighting | Roads & bridges | Electricity & lighting |
| Vendors | |||
| Vendors paid | 3 | 8 | 4 |
| Largest vendor’s shareShare of this MP’s vendor payments going to the single largest vendor | 77% | 28%(best) | 56% |
| Overall | |||
| MP scoreCompletion, spending efficiency, utilisation, proof of work, spending and vendor diversity. See About | 32 | 74(best) | 72 |
| Rank in house | 481 of 542 | 55 of 542 | 70 of 542 |
| Rank in state | 37 of 48 | 1 of 48 | 2 of 48 |
● marks the best value in a row where higher (or, for time and vendor share, lower) is clearly better. Rajya Sabha and Lok Sabha MPs work under different rules; compare like with like where you can.