Compare
Compare MPs side by side
Pick up to four MPs. The link updates as you go, so you can share the comparison.
Shri Mayankkumar NayakRajya Sabha · GujaratShri Babubhai Jesangbhai DesaiRajya Sabha · GujaratShri Govindbhai Laljibhai DholakiaRajya Sabha · Gujarat
| Metric | Shri Mayankkumar Nayak | Shri Babubhai Jesangbhai Desai | Shri Govindbhai Laljibhai Dholakia |
|---|---|---|---|
| Who | |||
| House | Rajya Sabha | Rajya Sabha | Rajya Sabha |
| Constituency / state | Gujarat | Gujarat | Gujarat |
| Money | |||
| Allocated limit | ₹14.91 Cr | ₹17.36 Cr | ₹14.91 Cr |
| Works recommended (₹) | ₹9.19 Cr | ₹15.81 Cr(best) | ₹14.65 Cr |
| Fund utilisationRecommended ₹ ÷ allocated ₹ (MoSPI’s measure) | 62% | 91% | 98%(best) |
| Paid to vendors (₹) | ₹2.43 Cr | ₹9.51 Cr(best) | ₹3.12 Cr |
| SpentPaid ₹ ÷ allocated ₹ | 16% | 55%(best) | 21% |
| Works | |||
| Works recommended | 180 | 296(best) | 124 |
| Sanctioned by districtSanctioned ÷ recommended works | 74% | 88% | 93%(best) |
| Avg time to sanctionGuideline: within 45 days | 4.3 months | 3.3 months(best) | 3.7 months |
| Awaiting sanction > 45 days | 30 | 22 | 9(best) |
| Works completed | 21 | 138(best) | 50 |
| Completion rateCompleted ÷ recommended works | 12% | 47%(best) | 40% |
| Works pending | 159 | 158 | 74 |
| Avg citizen rating | — | — | — |
| Avg time to complete | 7.7 months | 6.1 months(best) | 10.2 months |
| Top sector | Community buildings & public spaces | Roads & bridges | Education & libraries |
| Vendors | |||
| Vendors paid | 51 | 115 | 48 |
| Largest vendor’s shareShare of this MP’s vendor payments going to the single largest vendor | 6.7% | 5.2%(best) | 8.0% |
| Overall | |||
| MP scoreCompletion, spending efficiency, utilisation, proof of work, spending and vendor diversity. See About | 45 | 71(best) | 65 |
| Rank in house | 120 of 235 | 32 of 235 | 44 of 235 |
| Rank in state | 5 of 10 | 1 of 10 | 2 of 10 |
● marks the best value in a row where higher (or, for time and vendor share, lower) is clearly better. Rajya Sabha and Lok Sabha MPs work under different rules; compare like with like where you can.