Compare
Compare MPs side by side
Pick up to four MPs. The link updates as you go, so you can share the comparison.
Smt. Maya Chintaman IvnateRajya Sabha · MaharashtraDr. Ajeet Madhavrao GopchadeRajya Sabha · MaharashtraDr. Medha Vishram KulkarniRajya Sabha · Maharashtra
| Metric | Smt. Maya Chintaman Ivnate | Dr. Ajeet Madhavrao Gopchade | Dr. Medha Vishram Kulkarni |
|---|---|---|---|
| Who | |||
| House | Rajya Sabha | Rajya Sabha | Rajya Sabha |
| Constituency / state | Maharashtra | Maharashtra | Maharashtra |
| Money | |||
| Allocated limit | ₹4.90 Cr | ₹14.70 Cr | ₹14.70 Cr |
| Works recommended (₹) | ₹2.20 Cr | ₹10.98 Cr(best) | ₹10.19 Cr |
| Fund utilisationRecommended ₹ ÷ allocated ₹ (MoSPI’s measure) | 45% | 75%(best) | 69% |
| Paid to vendors (₹) | ₹95.0 L | ₹5.71 Cr(best) | ₹4.47 Cr |
| SpentPaid ₹ ÷ allocated ₹ | 19% | 39%(best) | 30% |
| Works | |||
| Works recommended | 32 | 91 | 105(best) |
| Sanctioned by districtSanctioned ÷ recommended works | 59%(best) | 58% | 44% |
| Avg time to sanctionGuideline: within 45 days | 2.6 months(best) | 10.0 months | 7.3 months |
| Awaiting sanction > 45 days | 3(best) | 38 | 59 |
| Works completed | 0 | 47(best) | 31 |
| Completion rateCompleted ÷ recommended works | 0% | 52%(best) | 30% |
| Works pending | 32 | 44 | 74 |
| Avg citizen rating | — | — | — |
| Avg time to complete | — | 10.1 months | 8.9 months(best) |
| Top sector | Education & libraries | Roads & bridges | Community buildings & public spaces |
| Vendors | |||
| Vendors paid | 1 | 41 | 21 |
| Largest vendor’s shareShare of this MP’s vendor payments going to the single largest vendor | 100% | 6.1%(best) | 16% |
| Overall | |||
| MP scoreCompletion, spending efficiency, utilisation, proof of work, spending and vendor diversity. See About | 9 | 73(best) | 61 |
| Rank in house | 184 of 235 | 28 of 235 | 70 of 235 |
| Rank in state | 12 of 19 | 1 of 19 | 2 of 19 |
● marks the best value in a row where higher (or, for time and vendor share, lower) is clearly better. Rajya Sabha and Lok Sabha MPs work under different rules; compare like with like where you can.