Compare
Compare MPs side by side
Pick up to four MPs. The link updates as you go, so you can share the comparison.
Shri Imran PratapgarhiRajya Sabha · MaharashtraDr. Ajeet Madhavrao GopchadeRajya Sabha · MaharashtraDr. Medha Vishram KulkarniRajya Sabha · Maharashtra
| Metric | Shri Imran Pratapgarhi | Dr. Ajeet Madhavrao Gopchade | Dr. Medha Vishram Kulkarni |
|---|---|---|---|
| Who | |||
| House | Rajya Sabha | Rajya Sabha | Rajya Sabha |
| Constituency / state | Maharashtra | Maharashtra | Maharashtra |
| Money | |||
| Allocated limit | ₹19.60 Cr | ₹14.70 Cr | ₹14.70 Cr |
| Works recommended (₹) | ₹17.60 Cr(best) | ₹10.98 Cr | ₹10.19 Cr |
| Fund utilisationRecommended ₹ ÷ allocated ₹ (MoSPI’s measure) | 90%(best) | 75% | 69% |
| Paid to vendors (₹) | ₹10.57 Cr(best) | ₹5.71 Cr | ₹4.47 Cr |
| SpentPaid ₹ ÷ allocated ₹ | 54%(best) | 39% | 30% |
| Works | |||
| Works recommended | 134(best) | 91 | 105 |
| Sanctioned by districtSanctioned ÷ recommended works | 69%(best) | 58% | 44% |
| Avg time to sanctionGuideline: within 45 days | 5.6 months(best) | 10.0 months | 7.3 months |
| Awaiting sanction > 45 days | 30(best) | 38 | 59 |
| Works completed | 54(best) | 47 | 31 |
| Completion rateCompleted ÷ recommended works | 40% | 52%(best) | 30% |
| Works pending | 80 | 44 | 74 |
| Avg citizen rating | — | — | — |
| Avg time to complete | 5.9 months(best) | 10.1 months | 8.9 months |
| Top sector | Roads & bridges | Roads & bridges | Community buildings & public spaces |
| Vendors | |||
| Vendors paid | 24 | 41 | 21 |
| Largest vendor’s shareShare of this MP’s vendor payments going to the single largest vendor | 26% | 6.1%(best) | 16% |
| Overall | |||
| MP scoreCompletion, spending efficiency, utilisation, proof of work, spending and vendor diversity. See About | 59 | 73(best) | 61 |
| Rank in house | 75 of 235 | 28 of 235 | 70 of 235 |
| Rank in state | 3 of 19 | 1 of 19 | 2 of 19 |
● marks the best value in a row where higher (or, for time and vendor share, lower) is clearly better. Rajya Sabha and Lok Sabha MPs work under different rules; compare like with like where you can.