Compare
Compare MPs side by side
Pick up to four MPs. The link updates as you go, so you can share the comparison.
Dr. Ajeet Madhavrao GopchadeRajya Sabha · MaharashtraDr. Medha Vishram KulkarniRajya Sabha · MaharashtraShri Imran PratapgarhiRajya Sabha · Maharashtra
| Metric | Dr. Ajeet Madhavrao Gopchade | Dr. Medha Vishram Kulkarni | Shri Imran Pratapgarhi |
|---|---|---|---|
| Who | |||
| House | Rajya Sabha | Rajya Sabha | Rajya Sabha |
| Constituency / state | Maharashtra | Maharashtra | Maharashtra |
| Money | |||
| Allocated limit | ₹14.70 Cr | ₹14.70 Cr | ₹19.60 Cr |
| Works recommended (₹) | ₹10.98 Cr | ₹10.19 Cr | ₹17.60 Cr(best) |
| Fund utilisationRecommended ₹ ÷ allocated ₹ (MoSPI’s measure) | 75% | 69% | 90%(best) |
| Paid to vendors (₹) | ₹5.71 Cr | ₹4.47 Cr | ₹10.57 Cr(best) |
| SpentPaid ₹ ÷ allocated ₹ | 39% | 30% | 54%(best) |
| Works | |||
| Works recommended | 91 | 105 | 134(best) |
| Sanctioned by districtSanctioned ÷ recommended works | 58% | 44% | 69%(best) |
| Avg time to sanctionGuideline: within 45 days | 10.0 months | 7.3 months | 5.6 months(best) |
| Awaiting sanction > 45 days | 38 | 59 | 30(best) |
| Works completed | 47 | 31 | 54(best) |
| Completion rateCompleted ÷ recommended works | 52%(best) | 30% | 40% |
| Works pending | 44 | 74 | 80 |
| Avg citizen rating | — | — | — |
| Avg time to complete | 10.1 months | 8.9 months | 5.9 months(best) |
| Top sector | Roads & bridges | Community buildings & public spaces | Roads & bridges |
| Vendors | |||
| Vendors paid | 41 | 21 | 24 |
| Largest vendor’s shareShare of this MP’s vendor payments going to the single largest vendor | 6.1%(best) | 16% | 26% |
| Overall | |||
| MP scoreCompletion, spending efficiency, utilisation, proof of work, spending and vendor diversity. See About | 73(best) | 61 | 59 |
| Rank in house | 28 of 235 | 70 of 235 | 75 of 235 |
| Rank in state | 1 of 19 | 2 of 19 | 3 of 19 |
● marks the best value in a row where higher (or, for time and vendor share, lower) is clearly better. Rajya Sabha and Lok Sabha MPs work under different rules; compare like with like where you can.